CCL:G: Gaussian 03 - optimization (linear, non linear) - negative
frequency
- From: "Shobe, David"
<David.Shobe++sud-chemie.com>
- Subject: CCL:G: Gaussian 03 - optimization (linear, non linear) -
negative frequency
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:23:57 +0100
Jim,
You've received several answers by now. The practical
consequences of the theory you have learned are as
follows:
1. You *do* have to guess whether the molecule / ion is
linear or bent.
2. However, if the molecule is bent, you don't have to know
the angle.
3. If you guess the molecule is linear and
it's actually bent, you will get those imaginary (negative) frequencies. If you
animate the frequencies in a program such as Gaussview, you will see the
molecule "trying" to bend.
(It's *always* a good
idea to calculate frequencies and check that there are no
negative/imaginary frequencies!)
4. If you guess the molecule is bent and
it's actually linear, Gaussian will optimize the angle to ~179.9 degrees, and
then will (usually) crash with an error
message.
Regards,
--David Shobe
Süd-Chemie,
Inc.
Attention to detial is
essentail.
Dear all
I have a problem concerning
optimization of molecules of more than 2 atoms.
I am using Gaussian 03 to
optimize and perform a frequency calculation of molecules such as for example
NaCN. NaCN is a T shape molecule and has a non-linear geometry.
If
I input a linear initial geometry and perform an optimization, will the molecule
(which is actually non-linear) converge to a non-linear geometry
I have
perform an optimization of linear NaCN and the stationary point was found.The
optimized geometry remains linear. But when I perform optimization of
non-linear NaCN with initial angle 120, the required geometry (T shaped) was
obtained.
My question is that must one have a knowledge of the geometry
of a molecule under study in its ground state to perform optimization. If so
what is the purpose of optimizing. Can an initial linear structure input
converged to an optimized structure which is actually non-linear
Can Gaussian
03 predict the structure of a molecule for which the geometry is unknown.
If so how?
I know that Gaussian 03 required an approximate initial
geometry. Is there a way
from theory to determine whether the molecule in
question is linear, bent or even a T shape.
For example OCS
molecule is linear. If one is going to calculate the adiabatic electron
affinity, one has to optimise the anion OCS- which I did with a linear
geometry just like with OCS. The optimize anion OCS- remains linear. But I
have found from many publications that anion OCS- is actually a bent shape
molecules.Again I perform an optimization of OCS- but this time with a bent
shape, angle 120. This optimized geometry with angle 136.7 coincide with the
publications. The angle has change significantly from angle 120 to 136.7.
Why the initial linear geometry of anion OCS- did not converge to the
optimised geometry with angle 136.7
note that the electron affinity
computed with linear anion OCS- and the bent shaped anion OCS- are totally
different. The one which coincide with the experimental value is the bent shaped
as required.
I perform a frequency calculation with the optimized
geometry of the linear anion
OCS- and obtain negative frequency
(saddle point which specifies a transition state). Does a negative
frequency mean the optimized geometry has not actually
been optimized. Does
in general a negative frequency is an indication that the initial geometry input
is not correct and hence must alter the initial geometry just like I did with
the bent shape.
Thanking you all
Best
regards
Jim
Check out the
all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done
faster.
This e-mail message may contain confidential and / or privileged information. If
you are not an addressee or otherwise authorized to receive this message, you
should not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this e-mail or any
information contained in the message. If you have received this material in
error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
message.
Thank you.