Re: CCL:G:SUMMARY OF RATE/ACTIVATION ENERGY
- From: chan()at()curl.gkcl.yorku.ca (Wai-To-Chan)
- Subject: Re: CCL:G:SUMMARY OF RATE/ACTIVATION ENERGY
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:56:33 -0500 (EST)
Having read Dr Topper's information about POLYRATE
I realize I should take back my remarks about the program
being inappropriate for isomerisation reaction rate calculation.
In writing my previous message I had in mind that
it is not always neccessary to apply unimolecular rate theory
rigorously using a package as sophiscated as POLYRATE.
One can estimate rate constants using a calculator merely by
substitution of thermodynamic quantities readily obtained from
ab initio MO calculations into the Arrhenius rate
equation, K = A * exp(-E/RT). Evaluation of the rate constant
this way is not strictly valid as E is the high-pressure-
-activation-energy which is not equivalent to the barrier height
obtained from ab initio calculation. Nonetheless the ab initio
barrier height should approximate E reasonably well and I would
not recommend one going through the trouble of calculating it
using RRKM method. My opinion is that applying RRKM method
safely requires a better than casual understanding
of the background theory which happened to be a difficult
learning experience to me. However I should have presented
my thoughts on using POLYRATE, which I never used, more carefully.
Finally I should point out I mistakenly referred to
Q the "partition function" from the Arrhenius rate equation as
the "entropy" in my early comments. My apology for the blunder.
Wai-To Chan
Research Associate
Department of Chemistry
York University
Toronto, Canada