Re: CCL:G:Model Builders for LINUX

 > they say that the reason they don't want to support Linux is becuase they
 would
 > have to put together their own distribution of Linux in order to provide
 any
 > type of support.  Further, they conveyed the general attitude that Linux
 > development moves too quickly for them to take a chance and port to Linux
 (I
 >  volunteered to type 'xmkmf' for them).
 Actually, their (second) argument does point to a problem with
 Linux. If you want to provide support for a program running under
 a certain system, you must have a machine running it and support people
 knowing it reasonably well. Linux is not really a well-defined
 system; strictly speaking, "Linux" is just the kernel. There are
 endless combinations of system libraries, utility programs, file system
 layouts etc. out there, all of which under the generic name "Linux".
 A possible solution would be to offer support only for a well-defined
 distribution (or a few of them) without any modifications. Whether
 this works in practice is of course an open question - I am not aware
 of anyone using such an approach.
 --
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Konrad Hinsen                          | E-Mail: hinsen-0at0-ibs.ibs.fr
 Laboratoire de Dynamique Moleculaire   | Tel.: +33-4.76.88.99.28
 Institut de Biologie Structurale       | Fax:  +33-4.76.88.54.94
 41, av. des Martyrs                    | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/
 38027 Grenoble Cedex 1, France         | Nederlands/Francais
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------