Summary: criteria for agostic interactions
Dear netters;
Recently I posted the following question:
>Are there criteria which define/verify the presence of an agostic H---metal
>interaction?
>
>I am mainly interested in organometallics where the H is not on C-alpha.
I have enclosed the replies to this question at the end of this note. My
thanks to all who responded! I was mainly interested in looking at this
issue for structures generated in modeling studies, where experimental data
are not available.
Well-defined agostic interactions appear to be easily recognized from a
simple examination of the geometry of the structure in most cases.
Unfortunately, I suspect that I am dealing with systems where this effect
is very marginal, yet may be important. There's the rub. How do you
quantify these weak interactions?
I also came across a method which is based on second-order perturbation energy
estimates (Kaufmann et al, Organometallics, v7, 1597, 1988). This method
seems to allow one to obtain quantitative estimates of these non-bonded
interactions. Any comments on this technique? More importantly, can this
method be invoked using Spartan software, for example? (forgive my novice
state of ignorance)
REPLIES =====================================
>
>there are several diagnostic spectroscopic criteria:
>
>1) 13C-NMR: Low C-H coupling constant may be for instance lowered to
>70 Hz for a sp2-C-H carbon atom
>
>2) IR: C-H stretching frequency in the range of 2600-2800 cm-1
>
>also: selective Deuteration of the particular C-H bond helps to establish
>2) and also allows to distinguish between an agostic interaction and an
>equilibrium between the C-H elimimation product (gives a metal hydride and
>an olefin in the case of a beta-hydrogen atom) and the metal alkyl complex
>(equilibrium isotope pertubation). For details of the latter check
>the following review by M. Brookhart, M.L.H. Green, Progress on Inorganic
>Chemistry (1988?) - I don't have the exact reference handy but I can find
>it for you if necessary.
>
>Further methods are:
>
>X-ray and Neutron diffraction: Grounds: M-H distance and M-C-H (alpha) and
>C-C-H (beta) angle arguments. Care should be taken however in the
>interpretation of X-ray crystal structures due to the inherent problems of
>this method to locate the "true" proton position.
>
>Alpha vs Beta vs .. There are quite a number of examples for both - lately
>even also Gamma-H agostic interactions have been discussed in the context
>of early transition metal Ziegler-Natta polymerizations with metallocene
>based catalysts. Also alpha (evidenced) and beta agostic interactions may
>play a role in this catalytic system.
>You'll find a pretty good discussion on agostic interactions in
>Bob Crabtree's monograph: The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition
>Metals, 2. ed, Wiley Interscience, (1994/3). Hope this helps, let me know
>if I can be of further assistance
>
>Peter
>_________________________________
>Peter Burger
>Anorg.-Chem. Institut
>Universitaet Zuerich
>Winterthurerstr. 190
>8057 Zuerich
>Switzerland
>PHONE:+41 1 257 4692 and 4677 (work)
> +41 1 252 1793 (home)
>FAX: +41 1 364 0191
>E-mail:chburger %! at !% aci.unizh.ch
*********************************************************
>
>A few years ago, we described (Mealli and Proserpio, Comments Inorganic
>Chemistry, 9, 37, 1989) how the agostic interactions can play a role for the
>stability of certain Re3 clusters. The arguments were based on some careful
>considerations of the stereochemistry of the non-hydrogen substituents
>at the alkyl groups suspected to give rise to the agostic interactions.
>Further support to the hypothesis came from the simplest MO theory arguments
>which allowed us to see some clear-cut differences between models with and
>without the agostic interactions at work.
>You may wish to take a look at that paper.
>Best regards,
>Dr. Carlo Mealli
>ISSECC, CNR
>Via J.NARDI 39, 50132 Firenze, ITALY
>e-mail: mealli %! at !% cacao.issecc.fi.cnr.it
>Tel. 0039-55-2346653 (243990) - Fax 2478366 - Home 4492709
*********************************************************
>
> We have looked at agostic metal complexes and have tried several
>approaches to 'quantifying' agostic interactions.
> One simple approach is to look at the CH bond length versus
>non-agostic models. This is often a tough comparison since the CH bonds
>lengthen very little when participating in an agostic interaction, which
seems
>to be consistent with exptl evidence from neutron diffraction. Likewise, if
>you can calc the IR spectrum you should see a lowering of the CH stretching
>freq for an agostic CH bond. With GAMESS we can decompose the IR spectrum
into
>normal mode contributions so you can look at the force constant of the
agostic
>CH bond and compare it to non-agostic CH bonds.
> Other things to look for are bond angles involving agostic CH bonds
>which deviate from 'normal' (i.e., VSEPPR) values. It is not clear if this
>will be as evident when looking at carbons other than C-alpha.
> You should also be able to plot the MOs and see if there is a
>multi-centered interaction among the agostic MHC unit. Similarly, plotting
>the total density in the MHC plane may yield some clues.
> Finally, in our work we have used a metric parameter defined by
>Crabtree
>and co-workers in the following paper.
>
> RH Crabtree et al. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 1986.
>
>Essentially, you need the calcd MH, MC, and CH distances, which you can plug
>into the equation given for rbp. As rbp decreases, agostic intrxn should
>increase. There are some exptlly determined systems to provide calibration.
> None of these approaches are unambiguous, but together they should
>provide some insight into whether or not a substantial agostic interaction
>is present.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Tom Cundari
>+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+==
>=
>Thomas R. Cundari Address from 3/15/95 -> ca.
August:
>Asst. Professor of Chemistry Prof. Tom Cundari
>Computational Inorganic Chemistry Lab Visiting Scientist
>University of Memphis Cornell Theory Center
>Memphis, TN 38152 520 Engineering & Theory
Center
>Bldg
>phone: 901-678-2629 Cornell University
>fax: 901-678-3447 Ithaca, New York 14853-3801
>e-mail: cundarit %! at !% cc.memphis.edu phone: (607)254-8686
> office: (607)254-8621
>http://www.memst.edu/chemistry/umchem.html fax:
(607)254-8888
> e-mail: same as always
>+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+==
*********************************************************
> Reply to: RE>CCL:verification of agostic inter
>This would be an obvious application of the "Theory of
>Atoms in Molecules" (AIM), by Richard Bader and coworkers.
>
>See the book, or the large literature on the subject. You
>need an 'ab initio' waverfunction and the AIM programs.
>
>Richard Bone
>__________________________________________________________
>
>Richard G. A. Bone, PhD.
>Computational Chemist
>Terrapin Technologies, Inc.
>South San Francisco
>USA
>
>E-mail rgab %! at !% trpntech.com
*********************************************************
>1/r is probably pretty good but still bad compared with explicit
>water.
>
>arne
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
> From: Arne Elofsson
> Email: arne %! at !% hodgkin.mbi.ucla.edu
> WWW: http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/arne/main.html
*********************************************************
Once again, thanks all.
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Eilert Ofstead, Sr R&D Assoc Research Division
e-mail: eofstead %! at !% goodyear.com The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Co
voice: 216-796-3983 142 Goodyear Blvd
fax: 216-796-3304 Akron, OH 44305 USA
_____________________________________________________________________