From PHYSPLMP:~at~:MIZZOU1.missouri.edu  Thu Mar 31 09:02:25 1994
Received: from MIZZOU1.missouri.edu  for PHYSPLMP-: at :-MIZZOU1.missouri.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id JAA09074; Thu, 31 Mar 1994 09:00:33 -0500
From: <PHYSPLMP /at\MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
Message-Id: <199403311400.JAA09074:~at~:www.ccl.net>
Received: from MIZZOU1 by MIZZOU1.missouri.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 8314; Thu, 31 Mar 94 08:01:31 CST
Received: by MIZZOU1 (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) id 3323;
          Thu, 31 Mar 94 08:01:31 CST
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 94 07:57:10 CST
To: thys- at -sch2.uia.ac.be
cc: chemistry;at;ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:IP and EA in semi-empirical methods
In-Reply-To:  thys%!at!%sch2.uia.ac.be -- Thu, 31 Mar 1994 14:43:35 +0200 (MET DST)


In 1990 J.J.P.Stewart, the author of MOPAC, prepared an extensive comparison of
PM3, AM1 and MNDO. It is published as Vol. 4, No.1, of J. of Computer-aided Mol
ecular Design, ESCOM, Mar. 1990 (a special issue).  Hope this is a help.
    Pat Plummer, Univ. of Missouri-Columbia