CCL:G: Confusing issue of Raman intensity Vs Static polarizability
- From: "Mi Yang" <miyang3790-$-gmail.com>
- Subject: CCL:G: Confusing issue of Raman intensity Vs Static
polarizability
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:46:43 -0500
Sent to CCL by: "Mi Yang" [miyang3790~~gmail.com]
Dear Kzys!!
Yes I am a gaussian03 Rev user but Your comments a bit confusing for me as in
G03 manual it is clearly mentioned that by using Freq=Raman you can
"Compute Raman intensities in addition to IR intensities" so I am not
understanding ur point of view.
http://www.gaussian.com/g_ur/k_freq.htm
There are some good quality of publications where they show computed raman
intensities with gaussian e.g.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2005, 127, 10977-10981.pdf
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Ferenc.Simon/publications/2005/Schaman_KBproc2005.pdf
So I have stoped my work and first want to confirm it.
Secondly, my calculated Freq value of Raman spectrum is in good agreement to
the experimental value for specific mode of vibrations after scaling. I am not
comparing directlt intensity with intensity.My purpose is to show increase of
intensity or activity upon intercalation of metal atom.What do you think in this
regard?
I need your comments in detail especially in view of above references
> "zborowsk]|[chemia.uj.edu.pl" wrote:
>
> Sent to CCL by: zborowsk**chemia.uj.edu.pl
>
> >
> > Sent to CCL by: favaro [laurent.favaro[#]u-psud.fr]
> > Do you mean that G03 does not calculate Raman Cross-section ?
> > I believe you are wrong.
>
> Gaussian calculates Raman Activities, not Raman Intensities, and obviously
> it is not the same. Raman Activities cannot be compared directly with
> experimental Raman spectra.
>
> Regards
>
> Kzys
>
> > Regards.
> > LF
> >
> > zborowsk]*[chemia.uj.edu.pl a crit :
> >> Sent to CCL by: zborowsk|,|chemia.uj.edu.pl
> >> Hi
> >> Dear Mi Yang
> >> I want to warn you if you are Gaussian user.
> >> Gaussian does not calculate Raman Intensities
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent to CCL by: favaro [laurent.favaro|*|u-psud.fr]
> >> Raman intensity is related to the square
> >> of the derivative of polarizability with respect
> >> to the normal coordinates of the vibrationnal mode.
> >> Best regards,
> >> Dr Favaro
> >> Mi Yang miyang3790_+_gmail.com a crit :
> >>
> >> Sent to CCL by: "Mi Yang" [miyang3790*gmail.com]
> >> Dear CCL users,
> >> I need some comments or refs about my problem. I am studying the
> >> interaction of a metal with a boron cluster. I found the large
increase
> >> of static polarizability and hyperpolarizability upon interaction
of
> >> metal atom to that boron cluster. I also calculated the Raman
spectrum
> >> which also showed high increase of intensity in metal boron
cluster. I
> >> read some indirect relationship b/m these two properties but now
in
> >> spite
> >> of my best efforts I could not find the direct relationship
between
> >> Static polarizability and Raman intensity. Anybody who knows any
ref or
> >> comments about this relationship (Static
> >> polarizability/hyperpolarizability and Raman intensity) would be
highly
> >> appreciated.?
> >> Miyang
> >> P.R.China>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Zborowski
> Faculty of Chemistry
> Jagiellonian University
> 3 Ingardena Street
> 30-060 Krakow
> Poland
> phone: +48(12)632-4888 ext. 2064 or 2067
> fax: +48(12)634-05-15
> email: zborowsk###chemia.uj.edu.pl
> gg 3817259
> skype kzys70
> www.chemia.uj.edu.pl/~zborowsk
>
>