On Dec 14, 2007 4:38 AM, Herbert Fruchtl
herbert.fruchtl~~st-andrews.ac.uk <
owner-chemistry(0)ccl.net
> wrote:
Sent to
CCL by: Herbert Fruchtl [herbert.fruchtl[]st-
andrews.ac.uk]
This discussion is as exciting and useless as C/Fortran or
vi/emacs, but
since it has started, here are my two pence worth of why using
a basis
set doesn't break the "ab initio" definition, by way of
an analogy.
We know how to get to a more complete basis set. We just can't
afford to
go all the way. So we choose one, and possibly a second (better)
one to
check how close we are.
We know how to do Full CI. Can't
afford that either. So we stick with
some limited number of excitations, and possibly do a few
test
calculations with a better method to check.
So, if we call HF,
MP2 and CCSD ab initio, we can as well call minimal
basis, vdz and vtz ab
initio. There is no systematic way to make B3LYP
(in the complete basis set limit) more accurate, and this is why
DFT
isn't ab initio.
Herbert
John McKelvey
jmmckel:+:gmail.com wrote:
> Kirk,
>
> Your comment is correct with respect to construction of basis
sets;
> however in any of the ZDO schemes, or other more elegant schemes,
the
> choice of basis set, the choice of post-SCF treatment, or the choice
of
> a DFT functional [or its construction] to get results that best
>
reproduce experiment is routinely done and is either semi-empirical or
>
purely empirical. Which term suits the best, I do not know. IMHO,
> "Everybody adjusts something to get the best
answer."
>
> Regards,
>
> John
McKelvey
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 6:59 PM, Kirk Peterson kipeters-*-
wsu.edu
> <http://wsu.edu> <owner-chemistry],[ccl.net
> <mailto:owner-chemistry
],[ccl.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
Sent to CCL by: Kirk Peterson [kipeters-$-wsu.edu <
http://wsu.edu>]
>
> As a sidebar to this
discussion, I have to strongly disagree that
> basis set
parameters, exponents or contraction coefficients,
> use
empirical data in their construction. All commonly used basis
> sets, even the Pople-style sets, are generated by
optimizing
> exponents and contraction coefficients to
minimize (ab initio)
> energies of atoms and sometimes
molecules. Some of the Pople-style
> basis sets utilize scale factors to apply to
atom-optimized exponents,
> but these were based on (ab
initio) molecular calculations
> and not experimental
data.
>
> regards,
>
> -Kirk
>
> On Dec 12,
2007, at 8:21 AM, Rene Fournier renef+*+yorku.ca wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sent to CCL by: Rene Fournier
[renef\a/yorku.ca]
> > David Craig and Robert Parr
first used "ab initio" in quantum
> > chemistry,
> >
see
> > http://www.quantum-chemistry-history.com/Parr1.htm
>
> Near the middle of that page, Parr recounts:
> >
> > " Craig
and I published this paper on "configuration interaction in
>
> benzene", where we took the pi-system and did essentially
a complete
> > configuration interaction
calculation on it.
> >
> > That has some
trivial historical interest in that it was there that
>
> the
> > word, the term ab initio was
introduced. Craig and Ross had computed
> >
everything from the start in London and I had personally computed
> > everything from start in Pittsburgh. Then we
compared our answers
> > when we
>
> were finished- This involved computing of all the integrals
as
> best as
> > they could be
done and selecting the configurations to mix for the
> > ground
> > and
exited states because there were electronic states that were of
>
> experimental interest and we checked our answers one against
each
> > other
> > when we were finished. And what the paper says is,
that these
> > calculations
>
> were done ab initio by Craig and Ross and by me, independently.
And
> > Mulliken later said that this was the
introduction of the term ab
> > initio
> > into
quantum chemistry. In the short review that you have, I talk
>
> about
> > this and reproduce a
picture of a letter from Craig to me where he
> > uses
> > the term ab
initio in a different context. So ab initio was
> >
introduced in
> > the quantum chemistry by Craig in
a letter to me and I put it
> into the
> > manuscript. That's where ab initio came
from. "
> >
>
>
> > Funny thing is Parr later became a
champion of Density Functional
> > Theory
> > and for many years (70's, 80's) DFT
practitioners were often
> > criticized
>
> for doing calculations that were not "ab
initio". I think views have
> > changed
now; "first-principles" was introduced probably to say
> > "mostly
> >
not empirical" but without the implications "ab initio" had
acquired
> > over
> >
the years. The term "ab initio calculation", as it's
commonly used,
> > very rarely refers to a calculation
"devoid of empiricism", for
> >
example
> > the choice of basis set parameters is
almost always empirical,
> > see discussion on
> >
> http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/resources/messages/2001/11/28.002-dir/index.html
>
>
> > Rene Fournier
Office: 303 Petrie
>
> Chemistry Dpt, York University Phone: (416)
736 2100 Ext. 30687
> > 4700 Keele Street,
Toronto FAX: (416)-736-5936
> > Ontario, CANADA M3J 1P3
e-mail: renef*_* yorku.ca
> <http://yorku.ca>
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 12
Dec 2007, Christoph Etzlstorfer christoph.etzlstorfer .
>
> jku.at
<http://jku.at
> wrote:
> >
>
>> There is a story about that in Michael J.S. Dewars biography
"A
> >> semiempirical life", American
Chemical Society, 1992, p. 129.
> >>
> >> Best regards
>
>>
> >> Christoph
>
>>
> >>
>
>> Am 11.12.2007 um 03:13 schrieb Tommy Ohyun Kwon ohyun.kwon
_
> >>
chemistry.gatech.edu <http://chemistry.gatech.edu>:
>
>>
> >>>
> >>> Sent to CCL by: Tommy Ohyun Kwon
[ohyun.kwon .
> chemistry.gatech.edu
<
http://chemistry.gatech.edu>]
> >>>
Dear CCLers;
> >>> I would appreciate it if
anyone could tell me who used the term of
>
>>> "ab initio
> >>>
calculations" first.
> >>> Thank you very much for your kind
attention.
> >>>
>
>>> Best wishes,
> >>>
>
>>> Tommy
>
>>>
> >>>
> >>>
--
> >>> Tommy Ohyun Kwon, Ph.D
>
>>> School of Chemistry and Biochemistry
>
>>> Georgia Institute of Technology
> >>> Atlanta Georgia, 30332
>
>>> Email: ohyun.kwon]*[chemistry.gatech.edu
> <
http://chemistry.gatech.edu>
>
>>>
> >>>
>
>>>
> >>> -= This is
automatically added to each message by the mailing
>
>>> script =-
> >>> To recover the email address of the
author of the message, please
> >>>
change> Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/
> >>> conferences/
>
>>>
> >>> Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig (login: ccl,
Password:
> >>> search)>
> >>>
>
>>
> >>
####################################################
>
>>
www.etzlstorfer.com
> <http://www.etzlstorfer.com>
>
>>
***********************************************************
>
>> Dr. Christoph Etzlstorfer Phone:
*43-732-2468-8750
> >> Universitaet Linz
Fax: *43-732-2468-8747
>
>> A-4040 Linz
E-mail: christoph.etzlstorfer,+,jku.at
> <
http://jku.at>
> >>
Austria http://www.orc.uni-linz.ac.at
>
>> ####################################################
> >>
>
>>
> >>
>
>>
> >>
>
>
> >
>
>
> > -= This is automatically added to
each message by the mailing script
> > =-
> > To recover
the email address of the author of the message, please
>
> change> Conferences:
http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/
>
> conferences/
> >
>
> Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig (login: ccl, Password:
> > search)>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY],[ccl.net
>
<mailto:
CHEMISTRY],[ccl.net> or
use:>
> E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST],[ccl.net
> <mailto:CHEMISTRY-REQUEST],[ccl.net> or use>
<http://www.ccl.net
> Conferences:
> http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/
>
<
http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/>
>
>
Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig (login: ccl,
Password:
> search)> <
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/>
>
>
>
--
Herbert
Fruchtl
EaStCHEM Fellow
School of Chemistry
University of St Andrews
E-mail to
subscribers: CHEMISTRY(0)ccl.net or use:
E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST(0)ccl.net or use
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml
Before
posting, check wait time at:
http://www.ccl.net
Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
Conferences:
http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/
Search
Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig (login: ccl, Password:
search)
http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt
RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/