From chemistry-request-!at!-server.ccl.net Mon Jul 8 13:37:00 2002 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu ([140.142.33.4]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g68Hb0p23384 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:37:00 -0400 Received: from mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.17]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g68Hatej030281 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:36:56 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jul 08 10:36:53 2002 -0700 Received: from donald ([128.95.128.116]) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g68HarTZ013441 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:36:53 -0700 Message-ID: <008301c226a5$63c35440$74805f80 -8 at 8- donald> From: "Carsten Detering" To: Subject: reduction of van der Waals forces Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:32:10 +0200 Organization: University of Washington MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Hi CCLers, I wonder if it is possible in InsightII to gradually reduce the van der Waals forces in an optimization job. I have an NMR structure of a chunk of RNA with a ligand, but the structure has some bad contacts, hence I have problems docking the ligand in its pocket. Any suggestions are glady appreciated. Thanks a lot in advance Carsten ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Carsten Detering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 email detering {*at*} u.washington.edu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~