From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sun Nov 24 10:11:04 1991 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1991 09:37 EST From: CHAMH@INDSVAX1.INDSTATE.EDU Subject: reaction field for non-spherical molecules To: chemistry@ccl.net Status: R With respect to the question about models to account for the reaction field for non-spherical molecules, Myers and Birge (J. Chem. Phys., 73, 5314 (1980)) considered this problem for a cylindrical solvation cavity. As expected there is, in this case, an orientation factor that affects the value of the dispersive interaction between the transition dipole and the solvent medium. Arthur M. Halpern Department of Chemistry Indiana State University Terre Haute, IN 47809 BITNET CHAMH@INDAVAX1 From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sun Nov 24 14:12:34 1991 From: fant@umbc3.umbc.edu (Andrew Fant) Subject: Non-classical carbocations in Mopac To: chemistry@ccl.net Date: Sun, 24 Nov 91 13:43:35 EST Status: R In the course of our current study on radialene chemistry, we have had the need to do structural minimizations on some protonated species that our inuition tell us should be non-classical. AM1 in Mopac 6.0 gave us a very classical structure that looked wrong, so we did a test case involving the norbornadienyl cation. That gave a classical carbocation and a Heat of Formation over 20 kcal/mole too high, as compared to the NIST GIANT tables. My question is this: Are Mopac and/or AM1 documented to be inaccurate with non-classical carbocations? I would appreciate any comments and references that anyone knows of. If this is common computational folklore that I have not come across before, my apologies for airing my ignorance in public. Thank you in advance for your comments +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Andy "The Fantom" Fant (fant@{umbc2,chem3,umbc4}.umbc.edu) Disclaimer: My postings are definitive, reality is often inaccurate "It is my supposition that the Universe is not only queerer than we imagine, It is queerer than we CAN imagine." - J.B.S. Haldane