From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Mar 20 02:39:18 1991 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 91 17:06:31 PST From: chiremv!andromeda!jeffb@uunet.UU.NET Subject: molecular conformations To: chemistry@ccl.net Status: R Dr. Nikolaos Sahinidis asked several questions re conformational analysis. See J. Med. Chem., vol 31, p. 1669 (1988) for a review which should answer these questions. Another important recent paper is JACS, vol 112, p. 1419 (1990), comparing several different methods for finding global and other low energy conformers of cycloheptadecane. Jeff Blaney Protos 6455 Christie Ave. Emeryville, CA 94608 chiremv!andromeda!jeffb@uunet.UU.NET From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Mar 20 11:04:41 1991 Date: 20 Mar 91 10:47 LCL From: PA13808%UTKVM1.BITNET@OHSTVMA.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU Subject: BITNET mail follows To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net Status: R TOPIC BOND DISTANCES CALCULATED BY MOPAC I WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE PERSON WHO WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE TYPE OF BOND DISTANCES CALCULATED BY MOPAC A QUOTATION BY J. P. STEWART. "NO DIFERENTIATION IS MADE BETWEEN VARIOUS DEFINITIONS OF BOND LENGTHS.THUS THE BOND LENGTH CORRESPONDING TO THE BOTTOM OF THE HARMONIC WELL (R0)IS NOT DISTINGUISHED FROM THE EQUILIBRIUM BOND LENGTH."STEWART ALSO POINTS OUT THAT FOR SEMIEMPIRICAL METHODS THE AVERAGE ERROR IN BOND LENGTHS IS LARGE RELATIVE TO THE DIFFERENCES OBTAINED BY COMPARING THE DISTANCES CORRESPONDING TO THE VARIOUS DEFINITIONS. THE ARTICLE CONTAINING THE QUOTE IS MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED PAGES LONG AND CONTAINS A VERY AUTHORITATIVE DISCUSSION OF ALL ASPECTS OF MOPAC INCLUDING THE APPROX INVOLVED IN AM1 AND PM3. A THOROUGH A DESCRIPTION OF THE MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES USED IN THE ALGORITHMS IN MOPAC IS GIVEN AND EVERYONE WHO IS A SERIOUS USER OF SEMIEMPIRICAL METHODS SHOULD HAVE THIS ARTICLE. IT APPEARED IN VOLUME FOUR OF THE JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN(1-105)1990. JOHN E. BLOOR DEPT OF CHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE TENN 37996-1600