From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Dec 5 16:52:01 2020 From: "Athira T John athiratjohn1#gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: NBO calculation in crystal with heteroatoms Message-Id: <-54232-201205150009-27510-3shUMo65KUWa74auBBJyyA+/-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Athira T John" Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 15:00:07 -0500 Sent to CCL by: "Athira T John" [athiratjohn1() gmail.com] Dear All, I ran an NBO calculation in a crystal structure containing heteroatoms N, S, and Br which resulted in dissimilar values of interaction energy when executed using different basis sets. Aninteraction with interaction energy (E(2)) of 1.3 kcal/mol was obtained while performing the calculation usingdef2-tvpz basis set and wb97xd functional. The same interaction gave an E(2) of 18.2 kCal/mol when calculated using aug-cc-pvdz basis set and wb97xd functional. What could be the possible reason for this abnormal value? What can I do to resolve this issue? Thanks and Regards Athira T. John From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Dec 5 18:19:00 2020 From: "Marcel Swart marcel.swart[#]gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: NBO calculation in crystal with heteroatoms Message-Id: <-54233-201205181652-8759-8/D/dF8hDclIKDUE5T3HnA,server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Marcel Swart Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-D0E77E92-3631-4F31-99EB-EC49F4F791D7 Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 00:16:44 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Sent to CCL by: Marcel Swart [marcel.swart%%gmail.com] --Apple-Mail-D0E77E92-3631-4F31-99EB-EC49F4F791D7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Make the basis sets larger and larger until the basis set size limitations d= o not affect the results anymore. Also known as Complete Basis Set (CBS) lim= it. I would aim for at least aug-cc-pVQZ quality. Marcel Swart FRSC FYAE MAE, Prof. Dr. ICREA Research Professor at University of Girona Director of Institut de Qu=C3=ADmica Computacional i Cat=C3=A0lisi Univ. Girona, Campus Montilivi (Ci=C3=A8ncies) c/ Maria Aur=C3=A8lia Capmany i Farn=C3=A9s, 69 17003 Girona, Spain www.marcelswart.eu marcel.swart+*+gmail.com vCard addressbook://www.marcelswart.eu/MSwart.vcf > On 6 Dec 2020, at 00:09, Athira T John athiratjohn1#gmail.com wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF > Sent to CCL by: "Athira T John" [athiratjohn1() gmail.com] > Dear All, >=20 > I ran an NBO calculation in a crystal structure containing heteroatoms N, S= ,=20 > and Br which resulted in dissimilar values of interaction energy when=20 > executed using different basis sets. >=20 > Aninteraction with interaction energy (E(2)) of 1.3 kcal/mol was obtained=20= > while performing the calculation usingdef2-tvpz basis set and wb97xd=20 > functional. The same interaction gave an E(2) of 18.2 kCal/mol when=20 > calculated using aug-cc-pvdz basis set and wb97xd functional. >=20 > What could be the possible reason for this abnormal value? What can I do t= o=20 > resolve this issue? >=20 >=20 > Thanks and Regards > Athira T. John >=20 >=20 >=20 > -=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D= ->=20>=20>=20 > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:=20>=20>=20 > Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs=20>=20>=20>=20>=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-D0E77E92-3631-4F31-99EB-EC49F4F791D7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Make the basis sets larger and larger until= the basis set size limitations do not affect the results anymore. Also know= n as Complete Basis Set (CBS) limit.
I would aim for at least aug-cc-pVQ= Z quality.


Marcel Swart FRSC FYAE MAE, Prof. Dr.
ICREA Research Professor at Univers= ity of Girona
Director of Institut d= e Qu=C3=ADmica Computacional i Cat=C3=A0lisi

Uni= v. Girona, Campus Montilivi (Ci=C3=A8ncies)
c/ Maria Aur=C3=A8lia Capmany i Farn=C3=A9s, 69
<= div class=3D"" style=3D"font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-positio= n: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; fo= nt-variant-east-asian: normal; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: spa= ce; line-break: after-white-space;">17003 Girona, Spain


vCard


On 6 Dec 2020, at 00:09, Athira T John athiratjohn1#= gmail.com <owner-chemistry+*+ccl.net> wrote:

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
=EF=BB=BF
Se= nt to CCL by: "Athira T John" [athiratjohn1() gmail.com]
Dea= r All,

I ran an NBO calculation in a crysta= l structure containing heteroatoms N, S,
and Br which resul= ted in dissimilar values of interaction energy when
execute= d using different basis sets.

Aninteraction= with interaction energy (E(2)) of 1.3 kcal/mol was obtained
while performing the calculation usingdef2-tvpz basis set and wb97xd
functional. The same interaction gave an E(2) of 18.2 kCal/mol w= hen
calculated using aug-cc-pvdz basis set and wb97xd funct= ional.

What could be the possible reason fo= r this abnormal value? What can I do to
resolve this issue?=


Thanks and Regards=
Athira T. John


<= /span>
-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mail= ing script =3D-
To recover the email address of the author o= f the message, please change
the strange characters on the t= op line to the +*+ sign. You can also
look up the X-Original-From:= line in the mail header.

E-mail to subscri= bers: CHEMISTRY+*+ccl.net or use:
    &nb= sp;http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
     http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_cc= l_message

     http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub= .shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: h= ttp://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.net/j= obs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announceme= nts/conferences/

Search Messages: http://ww= w.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml

I= f your mail bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error, check:
 = ;    http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt




= --Apple-Mail-D0E77E92-3631-4F31-99EB-EC49F4F791D7--