From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 00:04:00 2019 From: "Rajarshi Guha rajarshi.guha[a]gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53897-191218151220-24369-FW+Ji33PbD/AVhBPuWJjvg ~ server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Rajarshi Guha Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006941ba059a000f56" Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:12:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Rajarshi Guha [rajarshi.guha-$-gmail.com] --0000000000006941ba059a000f56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Surely you haven't been living under a rock the last few years (?) But just in case, gender bias is a real thing, has actual real-world effects and not something 'fashionable' https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2015/07/countering-gender-bias-conferences https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/countering-gender-bias-at-conferences/3007061.article https://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2019/08050/Unconscious_Bias_Study_Reveals_Disparities_in.6.aspx On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:14 PM Jim Kress jimkress35[#]gmail.com < owner-chemistry ~~ ccl.net> wrote: > Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35!A!gmail.com] > > Heaven forbid we actually live in a meritocracy. If you provide a list of > females who should be exalted due to accomplishments, I'm sure the > organizers of the Workshop would be interested. > Shouldn't organizers be handling this issue themselves? If conference organizers really have such limited academic /social networks that are all male, they can make use of resource such as http://iopenshell.usc.edu/wtc/ to identify women who would be relevant to the topic of the conference. -- Rajarshi Guha | http://blog.rguha.net | ~~ rguha --0000000000006941ba059a000f56 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Surely you haven't been living under = a rock the last few years (?)

But just= in case, gender bias is a real thing, has actual real-world effects and no= t something 'fashionable'

https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2015/07/countering-gender-bia= s-conferences
h= ttps://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/countering-gender-bias-at-conferences= /3007061.article
https://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2019= /08050/Unconscious_Bias_Study_Reveals_Disparities_in.6.aspx

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:14 PM Jim Kress jimkress35[#]gmail.com <owner-chemistry ~~ ccl.net> wrote:
Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35!A!gmail.com]
<= div>=C2=A0
Heaven fo= rbid we actually live in a meritocracy.=C2=A0 If you provide a list of
females who should be exalted due to accomplishments, I'm sure the
organizers of the Workshop would be interested.

Shouldn't organizers be handling this issue themselves? If con= ference organizers really have such limited academic /social networks=C2=A0= that are all male, they can make use of resource such as=C2=A0http://iopenshell.usc.edu/wtc/=C2=A0to id= entify women who would be relevant to the topic of the conference.

--=C2=A0
Raja= rshi Guha | http://blog= .rguha.net=C2=A0| ~~ rguha

--0000000000006941ba059a000f56-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 01:39:01 2019 From: "Matthias Heger heger(~)ualberta.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53898-191219013704-26404-WeKqKlUJS7nlRWV2KivmJQ*server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Matthias Heger Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 23:36:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Matthias Heger [heger_._ualberta.ca] Meanwhile, I'm sitting here wondering if I am the only one who actually enjoys watching the Angry Old White Man meltdowns for their entertainment value, at least when compared to the usual pace here on the Gaussian Tech Support List. Am 18-Dec.-2019 um 10:44 a.m. schrieb Nathan Seifert nas3xf .. virginia.edu: > CCL members, > > We should appreciate the great holiday gift bequeathed to us, the rare > appearance of Jim Kress. It is a holiday of macabre origins, not unlike a > bizarro Groundhog Day. > > In fact, his presence here is somewhat like a time-stretched Punxsutawney > Phil; when he pops his head out of his hole on (thankfully) increasingly > rare occasions and casts his shadow on our e-mail inboxes, it means we need > to spend another 6 years fighting for gender equity in our community. > > > With regards, > Nathan Seifert > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:10 AM Jim Kress jimkress35[#]gmail.com < > owner-chemistry-,-ccl.net> wrote: > >> >> Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35!A!gmail.com] >> If you don't "approve" the list of speakers, don't attend. The >> conformation >> of genitalia (or any other physical trait) is not a proper selection >> criterion. >> >> Speakers should be chosen on the basis of accomplishments, not gender. >> >> Heaven forbid we actually live in a meritocracy. If you provide a list of >> females who should be exalted due to accomplishments, I'm sure the >> organizers of the Workshop would be interested. >> >> Otherwise, you need to provide what you believe is an acceptable list that >> is representative of the 26 genders you and your comrades have chosen to be >> fashionable. >> >> Jim Kress >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com_-_ccl.net >> On Behalf Of Kathrin >> Helen >> Hopmann kathrin.hopmann.:.uit.no >> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 6:07 AM >> To: Kress, Jim >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry >> >> >> Sent to CCL by: Kathrin Helen Hopmann [kathrin.hopmann..uit.no] Dear >> Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry, >> >> I am sorry that I may have miscounted, it seems there is 1 female speaker >> among the 19 confirmed invited speakers (perhaps I have misinterpreted some >> of the other name and there are more?). >> >> I know it is not easy for conference organizers to ensure a gender-balanced >> program. But we need to talk about this problem sometimes, so that we can >> find out how we can improve things. >> >> with best regards, >> Kathrin Hopmann >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kathrin Helen Hopmann >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 11:27 >> To: 'CCL Subscribers' >> Subject: RE: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry >> >> Dear Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational >> Methods >> in Chemistry, >> >> I counted 19 confirmed invited speakers on your website. >> Sadly, not a single of these seems to be a woman. >> >> >> with best regards >> Kathrin Hopmann >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no^ccl.net >>> On Behalf Of >>> Francois Berenger mlists(a)ligand.eu >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 06:47 >> To: Kathrin Helen Hopmann >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry >> >> >> Sent to CCL by: "Francois Berenger" [mlists- -ligand.eu] Registration for >> the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry >> (FJCMC2020) is open! >> >> Please consider joining us March 19th and 20th 2020 at Kumamoto university >> (Japan). >> >> We will be lucky to have presentations by many prestigious speakers: >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/invited-speakers.html >> >> More information can be found at: >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/index.html >> >> The registration page is: >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/registration.html >> >> We are looking forward to meet you in Kumamoto, The >> organizers.http://www.ccl.net >> /chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp:// >> www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt> >> >> > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 07:51:01 2019 From: "Breton, Gary gbreton###berry.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53899-191219074740-4443-WH7Wy0qVOtcaqKHrypIjew .. server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Breton, Gary" Content-ID: Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:47:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Breton, Gary" [gbreton(~)berry.edu] I find it interesting that the only negative (as well as racist anti-white) comments (i.e. from Nathan Seifert, Matthias Heger) seem to be coming from those that think they are doing some self-proclaimed "greater good". On 12/19/19, 2:15 AM, "owner-chemistry+gbreton==berry.edu+*+ccl.net on behalf of Matthias Heger heger(~)ualberta.ca" wrote: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Berry College organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Email infosec+*+berry.edu if in doubt. Sent to CCL by: Matthias Heger [heger_._ualberta.ca] Meanwhile, I'm sitting here wondering if I am the only one who actually enjoys watching the Angry Old White Man meltdowns for their entertainment value, at least when compared to the usual pace here on the Gaussian Tech Support List. Am 18-Dec.-2019 um 10:44 a.m. schrieb Nathan Seifert nas3xf .. virginia.edu: > CCL members, > > We should appreciate the great holiday gift bequeathed to us, the rare > appearance of Jim Kress. It is a holiday of macabre origins, not unlike a > bizarro Groundhog Day. > > In fact, his presence here is somewhat like a time-stretched Punxsutawney > Phil; when he pops his head out of his hole on (thankfully) increasingly > rare occasions and casts his shadow on our e-mail inboxes, it means we need > to spend another 6 years fighting for gender equity in our community. > > > With regards, > Nathan Seifert > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:10 AM Jim Kress jimkress35[#]gmail.com < > owner-chemistry-,-ccl.net> wrote: > >> >> Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35!A!gmail.com] >> If you don't "approve" the list of speakers, don't attend. The >> conformation >> of genitalia (or any other physical trait) is not a proper selection >> criterion. >> >> Speakers should be chosen on the basis of accomplishments, not gender. >> >> Heaven forbid we actually live in a meritocracy. If you provide a list of >> females who should be exalted due to accomplishments, I'm sure the >> organizers of the Workshop would be interested. >> >> Otherwise, you need to provide what you believe is an acceptable list that >> is representative of the 26 genders you and your comrades have chosen to be >> fashionable. >> >> Jim Kress >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com_-_ccl.net >> On Behalf Of Kathrin >> Helen >> Hopmann kathrin.hopmann.:.uit.no >> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 6:07 AM >> To: Kress, Jim >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry >> >> >> Sent to CCL by: Kathrin Helen Hopmann [kathrin.hopmann..uit.no] Dear >> Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry, >> >> I am sorry that I may have miscounted, it seems there is 1 female speaker >> among the 19 confirmed invited speakers (perhaps I have misinterpreted some >> of the other name and there are more?). >> >> I know it is not easy for conference organizers to ensure a gender-balanced >> program. But we need to talk about this problem sometimes, so that we can >> find out how we can improve things. >> >> with best regards, >> Kathrin Hopmann >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kathrin Helen Hopmann >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 11:27 >> To: 'CCL Subscribers' >> Subject: RE: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry >> >> Dear Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational >> Methods >> in Chemistry, >> >> I counted 19 confirmed invited speakers on your website. >> Sadly, not a single of these seems to be a woman. >> >> >> with best regards >> Kathrin Hopmann >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no^ccl.net >>> On Behalf Of >>> Francois Berenger mlists(a)ligand.eu >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 06:47 >> To: Kathrin Helen Hopmann >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in >> Chemistry >> >> >> Sent to CCL by: "Francois Berenger" [mlists- -ligand.eu] Registration for >> the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry >> (FJCMC2020) is open! >> >> Please consider joining us March 19th and 20th 2020 at Kumamoto university >> (Japan). >> >> We will be lucky to have presentations by many prestigious speakers: >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/invited-speakers.html >> >> More information can be found at: >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/index.html >> >> The registration page is: >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/registration.html >> >> We are looking forward to meet you in Kumamoto, The >> organizers.http://www.ccl.net >> /chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp:// >> www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 09:24:00 2019 From: "Theodore S. Dibble tsdibble[*]esf.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53900-191219092209-3271-4Rv8/p1PN7vBl3MeU3w+/A ~~ server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Theodore S. Dibble" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:22:07 -0500 Sent to CCL by: "Theodore S. Dibble" [tsdibble_+_esf.edu] Dr. Hopmann, I am glad you raised this issue! Have you heard from the organizers of the workshop? Their silence (at least on ccl.net) is also troubling. Regards, Ted Dibble > "Breton, Gary gbreton###berry.edu" wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Breton, Gary" [gbreton(~)berry.edu] > I find it interesting that the only negative (as well as racist anti-white) comments (i.e. from Nathan Seifert, Matthias Heger) seem to be coming from those that think they are doing some self-proclaimed "greater good". > > On 12/19/19, 2:15 AM, "owner-chemistry+gbreton==berry.edu+*+ccl.net on behalf of Matthias Heger heger(~)ualberta.ca" wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Berry College organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Email infosec+*+berry.edu if in doubt. > > Sent to CCL by: Matthias Heger [heger_._ualberta.ca] > Meanwhile, I'm sitting here wondering if I am the only one who actually enjoys watching the Angry Old White Man meltdowns for their entertainment value, at least when compared to the usual pace here on the Gaussian Tech Support List. > > > > > Am 18-Dec.-2019 um 10:44 a.m. schrieb Nathan Seifert nas3xf .. virginia.edu: > > CCL members, > > > > We should appreciate the great holiday gift bequeathed to us, the rare > > appearance of Jim Kress. It is a holiday of macabre origins, not unlike a > > bizarro Groundhog Day. > > > > In fact, his presence here is somewhat like a time-stretched Punxsutawney > > Phil; when he pops his head out of his hole on (thankfully) increasingly > > rare occasions and casts his shadow on our e-mail inboxes, it means we need > > to spend another 6 years fighting for gender equity in our community. > > > > > > With regards, > > Nathan Seifert > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:10 AM Jim Kress jimkress35[#]gmail.com < > > owner-chemistry-,-ccl.net> wrote: > > > >> > >> Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35!A!gmail.com] > >> If you don't "approve" the list of speakers, don't attend. The > >> conformation > >> of genitalia (or any other physical trait) is not a proper selection > >> criterion. > >> > >> Speakers should be chosen on the basis of accomplishments, not gender. > >> > >> Heaven forbid we actually live in a meritocracy. If you provide a list of > >> females who should be exalted due to accomplishments, I'm sure the > >> organizers of the Workshop would be interested. > >> > >> Otherwise, you need to provide what you believe is an acceptable list that > >> is representative of the 26 genders you and your comrades have chosen to be > >> fashionable. > >> > >> Jim Kress > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com_-_ccl.net > >> On Behalf Of Kathrin > >> Helen > >> Hopmann kathrin.hopmann.:.uit.no > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 6:07 AM > >> To: Kress, Jim > >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry > >> > >> > >> Sent to CCL by: Kathrin Helen Hopmann [kathrin.hopmann..uit.no] Dear > >> Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry, > >> > >> I am sorry that I may have miscounted, it seems there is 1 female speaker > >> among the 19 confirmed invited speakers (perhaps I have misinterpreted some > >> of the other name and there are more?). > >> > >> I know it is not easy for conference organizers to ensure a gender-balanced > >> program. But we need to talk about this problem sometimes, so that we can > >> find out how we can improve things. > >> > >> with best regards, > >> Kathrin Hopmann > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Kathrin Helen Hopmann > >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 11:27 > >> To: 'CCL Subscribers' > >> Subject: RE: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry > >> > >> Dear Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational > >> Methods > >> in Chemistry, > >> > >> I counted 19 confirmed invited speakers on your website. > >> Sadly, not a single of these seems to be a woman. > >> > >> > >> with best regards > >> Kathrin Hopmann > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no^ccl.net > >>> On Behalf Of > >>> Francois Berenger mlists(a)ligand.eu > >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 06:47 > >> To: Kathrin Helen Hopmann > >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry > >> > >> > >> Sent to CCL by: "Francois Berenger" [mlists- -ligand.eu] Registration for > >> the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry > >> (FJCMC2020) is open! > >> > >> Please consider joining us March 19th and 20th 2020 at Kumamoto university > >> (Japan). > >> > >> We will be lucky to have presentations by many prestigious speakers: > >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/invited-speakers.html > >> > >> More information can be found at: > >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/index.html > >> > >> The registration page is: > >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/registration.html > >> > >> We are looking forward to meet you in Kumamoto, The > >> organizers.http://www.ccl.net > >> /chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp:// > >> www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 10:55:00 2019 From: "Sebastian seb.kozuch*o*gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Meritocracy Message-Id: <-53901-191219025153-11660-70Vx4UNeYjJ9188zGF3A5g^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Sebastian Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:51:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Sebastian [seb.kozuch_-_gmail.com]

Dear CCLers:

Since the topic of the women "quota" in comp chem has been already discussed here before (see the grand ICQC affair), I won't talk about it. Enough is to say that I believe that Jim Kress is wrong.


However, I would like to talk about the concept of Meritocracy.


TL;DR version: Whoever believes in meritocracy is wrong. Horribly wrong. Savage capitalism style of wrong. "Make America great again" kind of wrong.


Long version:

For those that are not familiar with it, there is a concept known in economy, sociology and obviously in sociology of science called the Matthew effect:

"For to every one who has will more be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29)

In simple words: "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_effect)

We know this from the great inequality that has plagued the world in the 21st century, but there are many studies that point to something that we all know here: Whoever received scientific prizes in the past will have a huge advantage to receive more grants, good students and honors in the future. There are mathematical models (https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525918500145) already pointing to the obvious:


Success = Talent + Luck

Great Success = A little more of Talent + A lot of Luck

(Daniel Kahneman, "Thinking, Fast and Slow")


Nobody says that the big names in comp chem are not bright. But there are tons of other bright and extremely hard working people that never made it to the big leagues due to a lack of luck. Maybe their PhD project was doomed to fail, but nobody could know that until someone tries it (a kind of sacrifice to the gods of science). Maybe their postdoc adviser was an a-hole. Maybe they were born in the wrong side of the world. And yes, maybe you come from a culture where women are not accepted as scientists since they will "neglect the family values". If by a stroke of luck you had a good head-start, your chances of success in the future grow exponentially.

In other words: Meritocracy is a myth. A dangerous, unfair myth. Both in the economic and in the academic world.


We are loosing many talents due to the lack of diversity and the belief that people reached their status only due to their capacity. We are making things worse each time:

1) We do not check that we give enough slots to women.

2) We review in a more harshly way a paper if we don't know the authors

3) We review in a more harshly way a paper if we don't know how to pronounce the names of the authors (this is a real thing!)

4) We do not put more effort in teaching and forming students coming from less happy backgrounds or less "academic" cultures

5) We give great honors to selected people just because they got honors in the past

6) We blindly take the H-index as THE measure

7) We applaud the people that published more papers than can humanly write (or even read!)

(what am I forgetting in this list?)


Of course that publishing more and getting prizes is great. Each time that my H-index climbs one number I get drunk. But we must acknowledge the luck effect, and especially the Matthew effect, in our and others successes.

The fair thing is to see beyond that and give more opportunities to the less lucky ones, with the hope they will have the same chances of showing their capacity. Sadly we must include women in this bag, even in the 21st century. It's not always easy, but we can start by trying to put more women and/or people whose names we cannot pronounce in the conferences' list of invited speakers.


Meritocracy should be one-way: the one who merits, should receive. If you believe that the ones that received did so exclusively because they merit, oh boy. Not only you are unfair, you are unscientific.


Thanks for listening to my rant,

Sebastian



On 19/12/2019 0:18, Jim Kress jimkress35_+_gmail.com wrote:
Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35[a]gmail.com]
So, they need to ensure they have proper representation of all 26 genders in their program.

From the responses I have seen, including the personal attacks by Mr. Seifert, it is obvious the concept of meritocracy is dead.
That is unfortunate.  It reduces these Workshops to useless displays of virtue signaling and mediocre science.

I will not comment further.  I'll have to invoke Mark Twain when he said " "Never argue with a pig. It just frustrates you and irritates the pig."

Jim Kress

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com{:}ccl.net <owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com{:}ccl.net> On Behalf Of Shahar Keinan skeinan : gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 12:43 PM
To: Kress, Jim  <jimkress35{:}gmail.com>
Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry


Sent to CCL by: Shahar Keinan [skeinan###gmail.com] I agree with Kathrin here, it is the role of the organizers to make sure that they have a balanced conference.

And it is the role of the community to call them out when they fail to do so.

Shahar


On 12/18/19 9:30 AM, zborowsk zborowsk,chemia.uj.edu.pl wrote:
Sent to CCL by: zborowsk [zborowsk]|[chemia.uj.edu.pl] W dniu 
2019-12-18 11:07, Kathrin Helen Hopmann kathrin.hopmann.:.uit.no 
napisał(a):
Sent to CCL by: Kathrin Helen Hopmann [kathrin.hopmann..uit.no] Dear 
Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational 
Methods in Chemistry,

I am sorry that I may have miscounted, it seems there is 1 female 
speaker among the 19 confirmed invited speakers (perhaps I have 
misinterpreted some of the other name and there are more?).

I know it is not easy for conference organizers to ensure a 
gender-balanced program. But we need to talk about this problem 
sometimes, so that we can find out how we can improve things.

with best regards,
Kathrin Hopmann
Do not only talk about, simply take a part in the conference, then the 
balance will be significantly improved.


-----Original Message-----
From: Kathrin Helen Hopmann
Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 11:27
To: 'CCL Subscribers' <chemistry^ccl.net>
Subject: RE: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational 
Methods in Chemistry

Dear Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational 
Methods in Chemistry,

I counted 19 confirmed invited speakers on your website.
Sadly, not a single of these seems to be a woman.


with best regards
Kathrin Hopmann

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no^ccl.net
<owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no^ccl.net> On Behalf Of 
Francois Berenger mlists(a)ligand.eu
Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 06:47
To: Kathrin Helen Hopmann <kathrin.hopmann^uit.no>
Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods 
in Chemistry


Sent to CCL by: "Francois  Berenger" [mlists- -ligand.eu] 
Registration for the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational 
Methods in Chemistry (FJCMC2020) is open!

Please consider joining us March 19th and 20th 2020 at Kumamoto 
university (Japan).

We will be lucky to have presentations by many prestigious speakers:
http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/invited-speakers.html

More information can be found at:
http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/index.html

The registration page is:
http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/registration.html

We are looking forward to meet you in Kumamoto, The

organizers.http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.
ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt>>> Conferences: 
http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/--
Krzysztof K. Zborowski
Faculty of Chemistry
Jagiellonian University in Krakow
2 Gronostajowa Street
30-387 Krakow
Poland
email: zborowsk-#-chemia.uj.edu.plConferences: 
http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/>     >

--
-----------------
Shahar Keinan
(919)-357-5319http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txtE-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY!^!ccl.net or use:
      http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST!^!ccl.net or use
      http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 11:30:00 2019 From: "Robert Molt r.molt.chemical.physics+*+gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53902-191219070300-2086-V9W5HHUpjRc0RBUzd8pU/A||server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Robert Molt Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D1664BAA-DBC9-4D49-B553-5C15B7D9C6C6" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 07:02:52 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Sent to CCL by: Robert Molt [r.molt.chemical.physics=gmail.com] --Apple-Mail=_D1664BAA-DBC9-4D49-B553-5C15B7D9C6C6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Let us consider civility. a.) If someone espouses a position which is sexist, it is more = constructive to attack the position than the person. Making ad hominem = attacks serves neither the cause of eliminating inequality nor does it = promote civility. When they go low, we go high, to quote a former = American President who embodied dignity. b.) I have seen little in the way of constructive solutions, merely = blame assigned. The right thing to do is to name the organizers of the = conference, ask them to please respond to why there is a dearth of women = to speak at the conference. Let them represent themselves, ask a direct = question. Ask what actions they intend to do to resolve the matter, = given that they agree a problem exists. c.) It is most certainly not OK to use terms like "the Angry Old White = Man meltdowns.=E2=80=9D This is as vile the (seeming*) sexism which = began this discussion. If it is not OK to say =E2=80=9Cthe angry old = black man meltdown,=E2=80=9D it is not OK to say =E2=80=9Cthe angry old = white man meltdown.=E2=80=9D If there is a substantive complaint, attack = the position; ad hominem attacks based on race are not OK. I thus ask Drs. Sugimoto and Berenger, as well as any other managers of = the conference: 1.) Did the initial invitation list include female invitees? Did they = decline? If so, can you provide names of people whom you invited? 2.) Given the observed gender disparity, do you agree that there are = qualified women who can speak? Can you send out invitations to rectify = the problem quickly? 3.) I want to thank you for organizing the conference. Organizing a = conference is very hard work, and one is clearly throwing oneself into = the danger zone to do so. Promoting science is a valuable enterprise = unto itself. *I say =E2=80=9Cseeming=E2=80=9D because I think it is inappropriate to = levy an accusation without letting the accused respond. Innocent until = proven guilty.= --Apple-Mail=_D1664BAA-DBC9-4D49-B553-5C15B7D9C6C6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Let = us consider civility.

a.) If someone espouses a position which is sexist, it is = more constructive to attack the position than the person. Making ad hominem attacks serves neither the = cause of eliminating inequality nor does it promote civility. When they = go low, we go high, to quote a former American President who embodied = dignity.

b.) I = have seen little in the way of constructive solutions, merely blame = assigned. The right thing to do is to name the organizers of the = conference, ask them to please respond to why there is a dearth of women = to speak at the conference. Let them represent themselves, ask a direct = question. Ask what actions they intend to do to resolve the matter, = given that they agree a problem exists.

c.) It is most certainly not OK to use = terms like "the Angry Old White Man meltdowns.=E2=80=9D This is as vile = the (seeming*) sexism which began this discussion. If it is not OK to = say =E2=80=9Cthe angry old black man meltdown,=E2=80=9D it is not OK to = say =E2=80=9Cthe angry old white man meltdown.=E2=80=9D If there is a = substantive complaint, attack the position; ad hominem attacks based on = race are not OK.

I thus ask Drs. Sugimoto and Berenger, as well as any other managers of the = conference:

1.) = Did the initial invitation list include female invitees? Did they = decline? If so, can you provide names of people whom you = invited?

2.) = Given the observed gender disparity, do you agree that there are = qualified women who can speak? Can you send out invitations to rectify = the problem quickly?

3.) I want to thank you for organizing the conference. = Organizing a conference is very hard work, and one is clearly throwing = oneself into the danger zone to do so. Promoting science is a valuable = enterprise unto itself.





*I say =E2=80=9Cseeming=E2=80=9D because I think it is = inappropriate to levy an accusation without letting the accused respond. = Innocent until proven guilty.
= --Apple-Mail=_D1664BAA-DBC9-4D49-B553-5C15B7D9C6C6-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 12:05:00 2019 From: "Mezei, Mihaly mihaly.mezei{:}mssm.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53903-191219093815-10262-zyp1wFGoNXNWT7uQP+pBmg{=}server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Mezei, Mihaly" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:38:08 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Mezei, Mihaly" [mihaly.mezei- -mssm.edu] Jim, I did read what you wrote. Suggesting that selecting speakers by meritocracy results in one women our of 19 IMPLIES that males are much more meretricious than females. For this logical conclusion you call me sexist? Mihaly Mezei Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Voice: (212) 659-5475. Fax: (212) 849-2456 WWW (MSSM home): http://icahn.mssm.edu/profiles/mihaly-mezei WWW (Lab home - software, publications): http://inka.mssm.edu/~mezei > On Dec 19, 2019, at 1:13 AM, Jim Kress jimkress35#gmail.com wrote: > > USE CAUTION: External Message. > > Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35 . https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=wYQ3yDer3V4cOYJ7UFtKzuajvem6LTR3C9VWD3OaLy0&e= ] > I'd suggest you actually READ what I wrote. I did not state women are > inferior. What I did suggest was that the concept of "MERITOCRACY" (a > non-genderized term) be use for invitations. I also suggested the original > author provide a list of candidates to the meeting organizers. > > Carlos Simmering's reply was useful and positive. Yours is just negative > and totally sexist. > > Jim Kress > > -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com+*+https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccl.net&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=crHrq7p2Zf7MdP8N_3Af9rPKrOT29RfnsSso40AHhJA&e= > On Behalf Of Mezei, Mihaly > mihaly.mezei|http://mssm.edu > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 1:34 PM > To: Kress, Jim > Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > Chemistry > > > Sent to CCL by: "Mezei, Mihaly" [mihaly.mezei*o*http://mssm.edu] Jim, > > there you go again. Do you really believe that male scientists are so much > more meritorious than female scientists that only one out of 19 makes the > grade? Furthermore, can you be so sure about your measure of merit that you > are able to confidently rank the field and tell who is the 19th and who is > the 20th? > > Finally, there is no need to insult a member of the CCL community - I > suggest you apologize. > > Mihaly Mezei > > Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount > Sinai > Voice: (212) 659-5475 Fax: (212) 849-2456 > WWW (MSSM home): http://icahn.mssm.edu/profiles/mihaly-mezei > WWW (Lab home - software, publications): http://inka.mssm.edu/~mezei WWW > (Department): > http://www.mssm.edu/departments-and-institutes/pharmacology-and-systems-ther > apeutics > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > > Speakers should be chosen on the basis of accomplishments, not gender. > > Heaven forbid we actually live in a meritocracy. If you provide a list of > females who should be exalted due to accomplishments, I'm sure the > organizers of the Workshop would be interested. > > Otherwise, you need to provide what you believe is an acceptable list that > is representative of the 26 genders you and your comrades have chosen to be > fashionable. > > Jim Kress > > -https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_cgi-2Dbin_ccl_send-5Fccl-5Fmessagehttp-3A__www.ccl.net_chemistry_sub-5Funsub.shtmlhttp-3A__www.ccl.net_spammers.txt&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=U02X5AAism6TOcQbUBElF33DBY4UzVamTOtfAn0v3QM&e=> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_cgi-2Dbin_ccl_send-5Fccl-5Fmessage&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=bPMl7FRbnTwfb5eiDFBVFw1e06bS3YR9JZ5tq-3CKdg&e=> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_cgi-2Dbin_ccl_send-5Fccl-5Fmessage&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=bPMl7FRbnTwfb5eiDFBVFw1e06bS3YR9JZ5tq-3CKdg&e=> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_chemistry_sub-5Funsub.shtml&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=7vkAXmUeLQPKKdd8JzBLvWfnKgFnXuhkdSygE7pK3ew&e= > > Before posting, check wait time at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=bdsLn9lFPunx4vOcyjoWQ4aHR1AUgnxBprfFypkA5x8&e= > > Job: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_jobs&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=yk5ftxyyNXy2AHFi2pZhhF9iWvXulSAZqUveM6TPbks&e= > Conferences: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__server.ccl.net_chemistry_announcements_conferences_&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=jaQXbKho-IR8T45RKS-coxJ7Y6CfqgerqZP9Ti8Wijs&e= > > Search Messages: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_chemistry_searchccl_index.shtml&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=LZ2d69xM7i3uU5phplqh_nS_G2NxSty7FkejUUhaFuQ&e=> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_spammers.txt&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=s2fnBYQa0_kMsYSQi_fv6fviPIsZ6wMsL_CL7rLshCE&e= > > RTFI: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ccl.net_chemistry_aboutccl_instructions_&d=DwICAg&c=shNJtf5dKgNcPZ6Yh64b-A&r=_pOLssyMlKixy9t2NfGIeaFX83dKDBvdACoDPwc9A9s&m=bErt4VvR-sM7mhR1QFpUkNB-pUQG5sGLtxc150UQxRk&s=iwg-vialbObEeXo62HzXLTVd_Y6tUq0mVz0TOk8t6hk&e= > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 12:39:00 2019 From: "Kathrin Helen Hopmann kathrin.hopmann(-)uit.no" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53904-191219115857-17186-YlFieNXJrc2T5kex/YFVSw{=}server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Kathrin Helen Hopmann Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:58:46 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Kathrin Helen Hopmann [kathrin.hopmann#uit.no] Dear Ted, The organizers may not be on CCL and hence not know about this discussion. I have heard from the person that posted the link to the workshop and I believe he has forwarded the comments to the organizers. For me, this discussion is not about a single conference, but about a general attitude in our community. As such, I find the discussion very valuable, also in absence of a response from the organizers of this specific workshop. I am happy to see the science-based arguments that have been brought forward here and that show that bias truly exists. I also agree with the comments by others that organizers are responsible to make a decent program and that the community is responsible for pointing out, when this is not the case. In my opinion, gender-balanced does not mean 50% females, it means a fair representation of the field. 1/19 (or 1/24 which was another conference I recently objected to) is not. Attempts to place the responsibility on the (female) individual that points out the problem (why don't you attend/invite yourself/send a list of possible speakers) are in my opinion misguided. A conference program should be decent the day it is posted online, not amended later. My Christmas wish for this year would be that everyone that is invited to a conference dares asking if gender balance was taken into account in the program ... and dares declining the invitation when it has not been. with best wishes for the season, Kathrin -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no]_[ccl.net On Behalf Of Theodore S. Dibble tsdibble[*]esf.edu Sent: torsdag 19. desember 2019 15:22 To: Kathrin Helen Hopmann Subject: CCL:G: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Sent to CCL by: "Theodore S. Dibble" [tsdibble_+_esf.edu] Dr. Hopmann, I am glad you raised this issue! Have you heard from the organizers of the workshop? Their silence (at least on ccl.net) is also troubling. Regards, Ted Dibble > "Breton, Gary gbreton###berry.edu" wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Breton, Gary" [gbreton(~)berry.edu] I find it > interesting that the only negative (as well as racist anti-white) comments (i.e. from Nathan Seifert, Matthias Heger) seem to be coming from those that think they are doing some self-proclaimed "greater good". > > On 12/19/19, 2:15 AM, "owner-chemistry+gbreton==berry.edu+*+ccl.net on behalf of Matthias Heger heger(~)ualberta.ca" wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Berry College organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Email infosec+*+berry.edu if in doubt. > > Sent to CCL by: Matthias Heger [heger_._ualberta.ca] > Meanwhile, I'm sitting here wondering if I am the only one who actually enjoys watching the Angry Old White Man meltdowns for their entertainment value, at least when compared to the usual pace here on the Gaussian Tech Support List. > > > > > Am 18-Dec.-2019 um 10:44 a.m. schrieb Nathan Seifert nas3xf .. virginia.edu: > > CCL members, > > > > We should appreciate the great holiday gift bequeathed to us, the rare > > appearance of Jim Kress. It is a holiday of macabre origins, not unlike a > > bizarro Groundhog Day. > > > > In fact, his presence here is somewhat like a time-stretched Punxsutawney > > Phil; when he pops his head out of his hole on (thankfully) increasingly > > rare occasions and casts his shadow on our e-mail inboxes, it means we need > > to spend another 6 years fighting for gender equity in our community. > > > > > > With regards, > > Nathan Seifert > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:10 AM Jim Kress jimkress35[#]gmail.com < > > owner-chemistry-,-ccl.net> wrote: > > > >> > >> Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35!A!gmail.com] > >> If you don't "approve" the list of speakers, don't attend. The > >> conformation > >> of genitalia (or any other physical trait) is not a proper selection > >> criterion. > >> > >> Speakers should be chosen on the basis of accomplishments, not gender. > >> > >> Heaven forbid we actually live in a meritocracy. If you provide a list of > >> females who should be exalted due to accomplishments, I'm sure the > >> organizers of the Workshop would be interested. > >> > >> Otherwise, you need to provide what you believe is an acceptable list that > >> is representative of the 26 genders you and your comrades have chosen to be > >> fashionable. > >> > >> Jim Kress > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com_-_ccl.net > >> On Behalf Of Kathrin > >> Helen > >> Hopmann kathrin.hopmann.:.uit.no > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 6:07 AM > >> To: Kress, Jim > >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry > >> > >> > >> Sent to CCL by: Kathrin Helen Hopmann [kathrin.hopmann..uit.no] Dear > >> Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry, > >> > >> I am sorry that I may have miscounted, it seems there is 1 female speaker > >> among the 19 confirmed invited speakers (perhaps I have misinterpreted some > >> of the other name and there are more?). > >> > >> I know it is not easy for conference organizers to ensure a gender-balanced > >> program. But we need to talk about this problem sometimes, so that we can > >> find out how we can improve things. > >> > >> with best regards, > >> Kathrin Hopmann > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Kathrin Helen Hopmann > >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 11:27 > >> To: 'CCL Subscribers' > >> Subject: RE: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry > >> > >> Dear Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational > >> Methods > >> in Chemistry, > >> > >> I counted 19 confirmed invited speakers on your website. > >> Sadly, not a single of these seems to be a woman. > >> > >> > >> with best regards > >> Kathrin Hopmann > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no^ccl.net > >>> On Behalf Of > >>> Francois Berenger mlists(a)ligand.eu > >> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 06:47 > >> To: Kathrin Helen Hopmann > >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in > >> Chemistry > >> > >> > >> Sent to CCL by: "Francois Berenger" [mlists- -ligand.eu] Registration for > >> the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry > >> (FJCMC2020) is open! > >> > >> Please consider joining us March 19th and 20th 2020 at Kumamoto university > >> (Japan). > >> > >> We will be lucky to have presentations by many prestigious speakers: > >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/invited-speakers.html > >> > >> More information can be found at: > >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/index.html > >> > >> The registration page is: > >> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/registration.html > >> > >> We are looking forward to meet you in Kumamoto, The > >> organizers.http://www.ccl.net > >> /chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp:// > >> > www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messag > ehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spamme > rs.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.ne > t/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 13:15:00 2019 From: "m.dominic.ryan===gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry Message-Id: <-53905-191219123915-18638-38fA8xmBPOtPH97FVYhsMQ a server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_022B_01D5B669.4E2E82F0" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:39:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: [m.dominic.ryan|gmail.com] This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_022B_01D5B669.4E2E82F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all,=20 =20 I qualify for the =E2=80=98older=E2=80=99 club since I once had ordered = 9-track tapes from QCPE and have been on CCL essentially from the = beginning but for the most part am a silent observer here now. With that = background I have to acknowledge the history of comp chem resembling = much of chemistry at that time in that it was large majority male. That = has changed a lot and brought a richness of ideas and discussion along = which can only be good for the field and science in general. Any bad = actors don=E2=80=99t indict the group.=20 =20 That shift does not mean there are no problems. Equally importantly, = problems do not have to have clear cut solutions. In fact the lack of = simple solutions makes it easy to ignore the problems or even not see = them as problems. As was implied, metrics and merit are complicated. = They do have importance and they do reflect historic norms. They deserve = respect since our respect for those on whose shoulders we all stand is = linked in part to how we got here. But it is tempting to view them as = simple hard filters: life is more complicated. As was pointed out, merit = and ego do a dangerous dance. =20 I encourage one and all to propose solutions in the spirit of decoupling = ego and accepting that others see a problem.=20 =20 Maybe that is what we used to call civility. =20 Dominic Ryan =20 > From: owner-chemistry+m.dominic.ryan=3D=3Dgmail.com++ccl.net = On Behalf Of = Robert Molt r.molt.chemical.physics+*+gmail.com Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 7:03 AM To: Ryan, M Dominic Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in = Chemistry =20 Let us consider civility. =20 a.) If someone espouses a position which is sexist, it is more = constructive to attack the position than the person. Making ad hominem = attacks serves neither the cause of eliminating inequality nor does it = promote civility. When they go low, we go high, to quote a former = American President who embodied dignity. =20 b.) I have seen little in the way of constructive solutions, merely = blame assigned. The right thing to do is to name the organizers of the = conference, ask them to please respond to why there is a dearth of women = to speak at the conference. Let them represent themselves, ask a direct = question. Ask what actions they intend to do to resolve the matter, = given that they agree a problem exists. =20 c.) It is most certainly not OK to use terms like "the Angry Old White = Man meltdowns.=E2=80=9D This is as vile the (seeming*) sexism which = began this discussion. If it is not OK to say =E2=80=9Cthe angry old = black man meltdown,=E2=80=9D it is not OK to say =E2=80=9Cthe angry old = white man meltdown.=E2=80=9D If there is a substantive complaint, attack = the position; ad hominem attacks based on race are not OK. =20 I thus ask Drs. Sugimoto and Berenger, as well as any other managers of = the conference: =20 1.) Did the initial invitation list include female invitees? Did they = decline? If so, can you provide names of people whom you invited? =20 2.) Given the observed gender disparity, do you agree that there are = qualified women who can speak? Can you send out invitations to rectify = the problem quickly? =20 3.) I want to thank you for organizing the conference. Organizing a = conference is very hard work, and one is clearly throwing oneself into = the danger zone to do so. Promoting science is a valuable enterprise = unto itself. =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 *I say =E2=80=9Cseeming=E2=80=9D because I think it is inappropriate to = levy an accusation without letting the accused respond. Innocent until = proven guilty. ------=_NextPart_000_022B_01D5B669.4E2E82F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all, =

 

I qualify for the = =E2=80=98older=E2=80=99 club since I once had ordered 9-track tapes from = QCPE and have been on CCL essentially from the beginning but for the = most part am a silent observer here now. With that background I have to = acknowledge the history of comp chem resembling much of chemistry at = that time in that it was large majority male. That has changed a lot and = brought a richness of ideas and discussion along which can only be good = for the field and science in general. Any bad actors don=E2=80=99t = indict the group.

 

That shift does not mean = there are no problems. Equally importantly, problems do not have to have = clear cut solutions. In fact the lack of simple solutions makes it easy = to ignore the problems or even not see them as problems. As was implied, = metrics and merit are complicated. They do have importance and they do = reflect historic norms. They deserve respect since our respect for those = on whose shoulders we all stand is linked in part to how we got here. = But it is tempting to view them as simple hard filters: life is more = complicated. As was pointed out, merit and ego do a dangerous = dance.

 

I encourage one and all to = propose solutions in the spirit of decoupling ego and accepting that = others see a problem.

 

Maybe that is what we used = to call civility.

 

Dominic = Ryan

 

From: = owner-chemistry+m.dominic.ryan=3D=3Dgmail.com++ccl.net = <owner-chemistry+m.dominic.ryan=3D=3Dgmail.com++ccl.net> On = Behalf Of Robert Molt = r.molt.chemical.physics+*+gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, December = 19, 2019 7:03 AM
To: Ryan, M Dominic = <m.dominic.ryan++gmail.com>
Subject: CCL: 8th = French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in = Chemistry

 

Let us = consider civility.

 

a.) If someone espouses a position which is sexist, it = is more constructive to attack the position than the = person. Making ad hominem attacks serves neither the cause of = eliminating inequality nor does it promote civility. When they go low, = we go high, to quote a former American President who embodied = dignity.

 

b.) I have seen little in the way of constructive = solutions, merely blame assigned. The right thing to do is to name the = organizers of the conference, ask them to please respond to why there is = a dearth of women to speak at the conference. Let them represent = themselves, ask a direct question. Ask what actions they intend to do to = resolve the matter, given that they agree a problem = exists.

 

c.) It is most certainly not OK to use terms like = "the Angry Old White Man meltdowns.=E2=80=9D This is as vile the = (seeming*) sexism which began this discussion. If it is not OK to say = =E2=80=9Cthe angry old black man meltdown,=E2=80=9D it is not OK to say = =E2=80=9Cthe angry old white man meltdown.=E2=80=9D If there is a = substantive complaint, attack the position; ad hominem attacks based on = race are not OK.

 

I = thus ask Drs. Sugimoto and Berenger, as well as any other = managers of the conference:

 

1.) Did the initial invitation list include female = invitees? Did they decline? If so, can you provide names of people whom = you invited?

 

2.) Given the observed gender disparity, do you agree = that there are qualified women who can speak? Can you send out = invitations to rectify the problem quickly?

 

3.) I want to thank you for organizing the conference. = Organizing a conference is very hard work, and one is clearly throwing = oneself into the danger zone to do so. Promoting science is a valuable = enterprise unto itself.

 

 

 

 

 

*I say =E2=80=9Cseeming=E2=80=9D because I think it is = inappropriate to levy an accusation without letting the accused respond. = Innocent until proven guilty.

------=_NextPart_000_022B_01D5B669.4E2E82F0-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Dec 19 21:35:00 2019 From: "Matthias Heger heger=-=ualberta.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Meritocracy Message-Id: <-53906-191219134519-9856-zBwu9uFTZ/6Mv1OkQ6Z9qw__server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Matthias Heger Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:45:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Matthias Heger [heger(a)ualberta.ca] Sebastian, First of all, thank you for that very detailed breakdown of what the meritocracy argument really is: A tool to justify the blatant victim shaming that we're seeing in this discussion. You're asking if you are forgetting anything in your list. I would actually expand on your fourth item - not fostering students from certain backgrounds enough - from the perspective of the current issue. How girls and women are judged in mathematics and science is not just about background, it absolutely is about gender too. This can be very clearly demonstrated. For example, randomized male or female names on otherwise identical resumes lead to drastic differences in how the applicants are rated in terms of competence and hireability for scientific positions. [1] One study found that already in primary school, girls can perform equally as well or even better than boys in math exams, but only if the tests are anonymized - otherwise, there is a distinct bias against them. This has obvious and lasting effects on their academic career choices right from the very start. [2] Gender bias among teachers and professors is an open secret. Putting the "meritocracy" nonsense on top of it is nothing less than adding insult to injury. It actually reminds me of the whole "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps" thing. Best, Matthias [1] https://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16474 [2] https://www.nber.org/papers/w20909 Am 19-Dec.-2019 um 12:51 a.m. schrieb Sebastian seb.kozuch*o*gmail.com: > Sent to CCL by: Sebastian [seb.kozuch_-_gmail.com] > > Dear CCLers: > > Since the topic of the women "quota" in comp chem has been already discussed > here before (see the grand ICQC affair), I won't talk about it. Enough is to say > that I believe that Jim Kress is wrong. > > > However, I would like to talk about the concept of Meritocracy. > > > TL;DR version: Whoever believes in meritocracy is wrong. Horribly wrong. Savage > capitalism style of wrong. "Make America great again" kind of wrong. > > > Long version: > > For those that are not familiar with it, there is a concept known in economy, > sociology and obviously in sociology of science called the Matthew effect: > > "For to every one who has will more be given, and he will have abundance; but > from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away." (Matthew 25:29) > > In simple words: "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_effect) > > We know this from the great inequality that has plagued the world in the 21st > century, but there are many studies that point to something that we all know > here: Whoever received scientific prizes in the past will have a huge advantage > to receive more grants, good students and honors in the future. There are > mathematical models > (https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525918500145) already > pointing to the obvious: > > > Success = Talent + Luck > > Great Success = A little more of Talent + A lot of Luck > > (Daniel Kahneman, "Thinking, Fast and Slow") > > > Nobody says that the big names in comp chem are not bright. But there are tons > of other bright and extremely hard working people that never made it to the big > leagues due to a lack of luck. Maybe their PhD project was doomed to fail, but > nobody could know that until someone tries it (a kind of sacrifice to the gods > of science). Maybe their postdoc adviser was an a-hole. Maybe they were born in > the wrong side of the world. And yes, maybe you come from a culture where women > are not accepted as scientists since they will "neglect the family values". If > by a stroke of luck you had a good head-start, your chances of success in the > future grow exponentially. > > In other words: Meritocracy is a myth. A dangerous, unfair myth. Both in the > economic and in the academic world. > > > We are loosing many talents due to the lack of diversity and the belief that > people reached their status only due to their capacity. We are making things > worse each time: > > 1) We do not check that we give enough slots to women. > > 2) We review in a more harshly way a paper if we don't know the authors > > 3) We review in a more harshly way a paper if we don't know how to pronounce the > names of the authors (this is a real thing!) > > 4) We do not put more effort in teaching and forming students coming from less > happy backgrounds or less "academic" cultures > > 5) We give great honors to selected people just because they got honors in the past > > 6) We blindly take the H-index as THE measure > > 7) We applaud the people that published more papers than can humanly write (or > even read!) > > (what am I forgetting in this list?) > > > Of course that publishing more and getting prizes is great. Each time that my > H-index climbs one number I get drunk. But we must acknowledge the luck effect, > and especially the Matthew effect, in our and others successes. > > The fair thing is to see beyond that and give more opportunities to the less > lucky ones, with the hope they will have the same chances of showing their > capacity. Sadly we must include women in this bag, even in the 21st century. > It's not always easy, but we can start by trying to put more women and/or people > whose names we cannot pronounce in the conferences' list of invited speakers. > > > Meritocracy should be one-way: the one who merits, should receive. If you > believe that the ones that received did so exclusively because they merit, oh > boy. Not only you are unfair, you are unscientific. > > > Thanks for listening to my rant, > > Sebastian > > > > On 19/12/2019 0:18, Jim Kress jimkress35_+_gmail.com wrote: >> Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [jimkress35[a]gmail.com] >> So, they need to ensure they have proper representation of all 26 genders in their program. >> >>> From the responses I have seen, including the personal attacks by Mr. Seifert, it is obvious the concept of meritocracy is dead. >> That is unfortunate. It reduces these Workshops to useless displays of virtue signaling and mediocre science. >> >> I will not comment further. I'll have to invoke Mark Twain when he said " "Never argue with a pig. It just frustrates you and irritates the pig." >> >> Jim Kress >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-chemistry+jimkress35==gmail.com{:}ccl.net On Behalf Of Shahar Keinan skeinan : gmail.com >> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 12:43 PM >> To: Kress, Jim >> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods in Chemistry >> >> >> Sent to CCL by: Shahar Keinan [skeinan###gmail.com] I agree with Kathrin here, it is the role of the organizers to make sure that they have a balanced conference. >> >> And it is the role of the community to call them out when they fail to do so. >> >> Shahar >> >> >> On 12/18/19 9:30 AM, zborowsk zborowsk,chemia.uj.edu.pl wrote: >>> Sent to CCL by: zborowsk [zborowsk]|[chemia.uj.edu.pl] W dniu >>> 2019-12-18 11:07, Kathrin Helen Hopmann kathrin.hopmann.:.uit.no >>> napisał(a): >>>> Sent to CCL by: Kathrin Helen Hopmann [kathrin.hopmann..uit.no] Dear >>>> Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational >>>> Methods in Chemistry, >>>> >>>> I am sorry that I may have miscounted, it seems there is 1 female >>>> speaker among the 19 confirmed invited speakers (perhaps I have >>>> misinterpreted some of the other name and there are more?). >>>> >>>> I know it is not easy for conference organizers to ensure a >>>> gender-balanced program. But we need to talk about this problem >>>> sometimes, so that we can find out how we can improve things. >>>> >>>> with best regards, >>>> Kathrin Hopmann >>> Do not only talk about, simply take a part in the conference, then the >>> balance will be significantly improved. >>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Kathrin Helen Hopmann >>>> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 11:27 >>>> To: 'CCL Subscribers' >>>> Subject: RE: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational >>>> Methods in Chemistry >>>> >>>> Dear Organizers of the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational >>>> Methods in Chemistry, >>>> >>>> I counted 19 confirmed invited speakers on your website. >>>> Sadly, not a single of these seems to be a woman. >>>> >>>> >>>> with best regards >>>> Kathrin Hopmann >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: owner-chemistry+kathrin.hopmann==uit.no^ccl.net >>>>> On Behalf Of >>>>> Francois Berenger mlists(a)ligand.eu >>>> Sent: onsdag 18. desember 2019 06:47 >>>> To: Kathrin Helen Hopmann >>>> Subject: CCL: 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational Methods >>>> in Chemistry >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent to CCL by: "Francois Berenger" [mlists- -ligand.eu] >>>> Registration for the 8th French-Japanese Workshop on Computational >>>> Methods in Chemistry (FJCMC2020) is open! >>>> >>>> Please consider joining us March 19th and 20th 2020 at Kumamoto >>>> university (Japan). >>>> >>>> We will be lucky to have presentations by many prestigious speakers: >>>> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/invited-speakers.html >>>> >>>> More information can be found at: >>>> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/index.html >>>> >>>> The registration page is: >>>> http://www.chem.kumamoto-u.ac.jp/~frjp2020/registration.html >>>> >>>> We are looking forward to meet you in Kumamoto, The >>>> >>>> organizers.http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www. >>>> ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt>>> Conferences: >>>> http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/-- >>> Krzysztof K. Zborowski >>> Faculty of Chemistry >>> Jagiellonian University in Krakow >>> 2 Gronostajowa Street >>> 30-387 Krakow >>> Poland >>> email: zborowsk-#-chemia.uj.edu.plConferences: >>> http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/> > >>> >> -- >> ----------------- >> Shahar Keinan >> (919)-357-5319http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txtE-mail to subscribers:CHEMISTRY() ccl.net or use:>> >> E-mail to administrators:CHEMISTRY-REQUEST() ccl.net or usehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml >> >> Before posting, check wait time at:http://www.ccl.net >> >> Job:http://www.ccl.net/jobs >> Conferences:http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/ >> >> Search Messages:http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt >> >> RTFI:http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/To > recover the email address of the author of the message, please change the > strange characters on the top line to the ,, sign. You can also look up the > X-Original-From: line in the mail header. E-mail to subscribers: > CHEMISTRY,,ccl.net or use:E-mail > to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST,,ccl.net or useBefore posting, check wait time at: > http://www.ccl.netConferences: > http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/ Search Messages: > http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml If your mail bounces from CCL > with 5.7.1 error, check:RTFI: > http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/ >