From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Oct 17 05:57:01 2013 From: "Adrian Philip Stevens adrian.stevens],[accelrys.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Accelrys Predictive Science Webinar series Message-Id: <-49251-131017055457-28752-w4tUXVfBNyCTL+PbHV8l4A,server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Adrian Philip Stevens" Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 05:54:56 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Adrian Philip Stevens" [adrian.stevens(~)accelrys.com] Dear CCL, As part of the launch of Accelrys Predictive Science solutions, we are hosting a series of webinars to showcase new scientific features and functionality. Today's opening presentation is a review of the drivers affecting change on the pharmaceutical industry and a look towards how predictive science solutions are helping industry to improve its efficiency to innovate new products. The presentation will be delivered jointly by Dr. Adel Laoui, Managing Director Life Science, Accelrys and Dr. Hugues-Olivier Bertrand, Sr. Director & Sr. Fellow - Modeling & Simulations, Accelrys. To register for the webinar, visit: http://accelrys.com/events/webinars/discovery-studio/ Following on from today's presentation, the following presentations are scheduled: - Oct 22: Whats New in Discovery Studio 4.0 - Oct 29: Design Better Biologics with Improved Stability and Binding Affinity - Nov 5: Simplifying Molecular Simulations and Analysis with Discovery Studio - Nov 12: Discovery Studio Non-Bond Analysis: Understanding Interactions To register for any of our webinars in the series, visit: http://accelrys.com/events/webinars/discovery-studio/ Best regards, Adrian. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Oct 17 10:26:01 2013 From: "Alexander Kulesza CoolEsza__gmx.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Gaussian09: Approx. Hessian in Excited State Opt Message-Id: <-49252-131017095925-12605-m6VWmdFjB/aCbWohtgqdOA###server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Alexander Kulesza" Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:59:21 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Alexander Kulesza" [CoolEsza(_)gmx.de] Dear Community, upon inspection of my fchk files of the tddft ex state optimization I did not find entrys for the cartesian force constants. is there a way to force this data to be printed in the ex. state. opt ? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Alexander Kulesza Research Fellow Computational Biophysics Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlin Berlin - Germany From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Oct 17 13:31:01 2013 From: "Close, David M. CLOSED+/-mail.etsu.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Accurate vertical ionization energies Message-Id: <-49253-131017132931-30377-m+RhmbkETPDUi9QjpVOGwA-#-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Close, David M." Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:29:22 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Close, David M." [CLOSED++mail.etsu.edu] Scott: I have several answers to your question. But first it is important to ask how big your systems are. It may be very time consuming to use CCSD on a large system. Next it is important to know if you have benchmark experimental results to compare your calculations with. Having said that, I would recommend the paper by Verdolino et al (J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 16860. They did calculations on the nucleobases and got results in good agreement with experimental values using B3lyp/6-31+G(d,P) opts followed by single point aug-cc-pVTZ calculations. You don't say if you are doing gas phase or solution phase calculations. If you are doing PCM calculations this paper is interesting because of methods described to alter the cavity size for the anions and cations. But there is another problem even if you have good experimental data. There are discussions in the literature of whether vertical IP's in the literature are actually adiabatic IP's. If this is a concern you should look at Hildenbrand, Int. J. Mass Spect. 2000, 197, 237. Regards, Dave Close. -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry+closed==etsu.edu-.-ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry+closed==etsu.edu-.-ccl.net] On Behalf Of Scott Mckechnie jsm78|cam.ac.uk Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 6:43 AM To: Close, David M. Subject: CCL: Accurate vertical ionization energies Sent to CCL by: "Scott Mckechnie" [jsm78 a cam.ac.uk] Dear all, I would like to compare vertical ionization energies obtained from DFT with highly accurate energies computed from a higher level method. I was hoping to get a sense of the accuracy of DFT ionization energies from different functionals and basis sets. I've noticed CCSD(T) is commonly used and I'm wondering what people would recommend. Also, any references would be much appreciated. Best wishes, Scotthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Oct 17 16:01:00 2013 From: "Scott McKechnie jsm78^-^cam.ac.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Accurate vertical ionization energies Message-Id: <-49254-131017155836-3738-Y43T7QKpP4tzckOQKIuedQ(~)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Scott McKechnie Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6dc31ee551c504e8f53d83 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:58:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Scott McKechnie [jsm78-x-cam.ac.uk] --047d7b6dc31ee551c504e8f53d83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear all, Many thanks for the answers and for the helpful references. Dave Close- Thank you for your detailed reply. I am looking at organic molecules up to around 100 atoms in size. I don't have experimental values for the specific systems of interest so I was thinking of comparing the performance of various DFT functionals and basis sets against higher level computational results. The plan was to use B3LYP optimized geometries and to compare vertical IP values from other approaches based on single point energy calculations on top of these geometries. I am looking for a higher level of theory (again purely in terms of the electronic structure, i.e single-point energy calculations on the same geometry) with which to compare the DFT results. I am interested in both gas phase and solution (implicit model such as PCM). Would you then recommend CCSD? Best wishes, Scott On 17 October 2013 18:29, Close, David M. CLOSED+/-mail.etsu.edu < owner-chemistry()ccl.net> wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Close, David M." [CLOSED++mail.etsu.edu] > Scott: > I have several answers to your question. But first it is important to > ask how big your systems are. It may be very time consuming to use CCSD on > a large system. Next it is important to know if you have benchmark > experimental results to compare your calculations with. > Having said that, I would recommend the paper by Verdolino et al (J. > Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 16860. They did calculations on the nucleobases > and got results in good agreement with experimental values using > B3lyp/6-31+G(d,P) opts followed by single point aug-cc-pVTZ calculations. > You don't say if you are doing gas phase or solution phase calculations. > If you are doing PCM calculations this paper is interesting because of > methods described to alter the cavity size for the anions and cations. > But there is another problem even if you have good experimental data. > There are discussions in the literature of whether vertical IP's in the > literature are actually adiabatic IP's. If this is a concern you should > look at Hildenbrand, Int. J. Mass Spect. 2000, 197, 237. > > Regards, Dave Close. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-chemistry+closed==etsu.edu#ccl.net [mailto: > owner-chemistry+closed==etsu.edu#ccl.net] On Behalf Of Scott Mckechnie > jsm78|cam.ac.uk > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 6:43 AM > To: Close, David M. > Subject: CCL: Accurate vertical ionization energies > > > Sent to CCL by: "Scott Mckechnie" [jsm78 a cam.ac.uk] Dear all, > > I would like to compare vertical ionization energies obtained from DFT > with highly accurate energies computed from a higher level method. I was > hoping to get a sense of the accuracy of DFT ionization energies from > different functionals and basis sets. I've noticed CCSD(T) is commonly used > and I'm wondering what people would recommend. Also, any references would > be much appreciated. > > Best wishes, > > Scotthttp:// > www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt> > > > --047d7b6dc31ee551c504e8f53d83 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear all,

Many thanks for the answers a= nd for the helpful references.

Dave Close- Thank y= ou for your detailed reply. I am looking at organic molecules up to around = 100 atoms in size. I don't have experimental values for the specific sy= stems of interest so I was thinking of comparing the performance of various= DFT functionals and basis sets against higher level computational results.= The plan was to use B3LYP optimized geometries and to compare vertical IP = values from other approaches based on single point energy calculations on t= op of these geometries. I am looking for a higher level of theory (again pu= rely in terms of the electronic structure, i.e single-point energy calculat= ions on the same geometry) with which to compare the DFT results. I am inte= rested in both gas phase and solution (implicit model such as PCM). Would y= ou then recommend CCSD?

Best wishes,

Scott =A0=A0


On 17 = October 2013 18:29, Close, David M. CLOSED+/-mail.etsu.edu <owner-chemistry()ccl.net> wrote:<= br>

Sent to CCL by: "Close, David M." [CLOSED++mail.etsu.edu]
Scott:
=A0 I have several answers to your question. =A0But first it is important t= o ask how big your systems are. =A0It may be very time consuming to use CCS= D on a large system. =A0Next it is important to know if you have benchmark = experimental results to compare your calculations with.
=A0 Having said that, I would recommend the paper by Verdolino et al (J. Ph= ys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 16860. =A0They did calculations on the nucleobases a= nd got results in good agreement with experimental values using B3lyp/6-31+= G(d,P) opts followed by =A0single point aug-cc-pVTZ calculations. =A0You do= n't say if you are doing gas phase or solution phase calculations. =A0I= f you are doing PCM calculations this paper is interesting because of metho= ds described to alter the cavity size for the anions and cations.
=A0 But there is another problem even if you have good experimental data. = =A0There are discussions in the literature =A0of whether vertical IP's = in the literature are actually adiabatic IP's. =A0If this is a concern = you should look at Hildenbrand, Int. J. Mass Spect. 2000, 197, 237.

=A0 Regards, Dave Close.

-----Original Message-----
> From: owner-chemistry+closed=3D=3Detsu.edu#ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry+closed=3D=3Detsu.edu#ccl.net] On Behalf Of Scott Mckechn= ie jsm78|cam.ac.uk
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 6:43 AM
To: Close, David M.
Subject: CCL: Accurate vertical ionization energies


Sent to CCL by: "Scott =A0Mckechnie" [jsm78 a cam.ac.uk] Dear all,

I would like to compare vertical ionization energies obtained from DFT with= highly accurate energies computed from a higher level method. I was hoping= to get a sense of the accuracy of DFT ionization energies from different f= unctionals and basis sets. I've noticed CCSD(T) is commonly used and I&= #39;m wondering what people would recommend. Also, any references would be = much appreciated.

Best wishes,

Scotthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/c= hemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt


-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY()ccl.n= et or use:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEM= ISTRY-REQUEST()ccl.net or use
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/co= nferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
=A0 =A0 =A0
h= ttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/




--047d7b6dc31ee551c504e8f53d83-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Oct 17 21:47:00 2013 From: "Prof Ponnadurai Ramasami ramchemi|intnet.mu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Call for Full Paper-8th Workshop on Computational Chemistry and Its Applications-Part of ICCS 2014 Message-Id: <-49255-131017214019-4263-0K2KH24n2W2wUfPBkvEb9A\a/server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Prof Ponnadurai Ramasami" Content-Language: en-gb Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003E_01CECBC4.817A5670" Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 05:40:08 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Prof Ponnadurai Ramasami" [ramchemi a intnet.mu] This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01CECBC4.817A5670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Sir/Madam The 8th Workshop on Computational Chemistry and Its Applications (8th = CCA) will be organized as part of the International Conference on = Computational Science (ICCS 2014). ICCS 2014 will be held from 10 to 12 June 2014 in Cairns, Australia. http://iccs2014.ivec.org/ You are invited to submit full paper/s to be considered for the 8th CCA workshop.=20 Prof Michelle Coote from the = Australian National University, Australia, will deliver the keynote address = entitled "Computer-aided design of stereocontrol agents for radical = polymerization". All details are available on the workshop webpage, http://sites.uom.ac.mu/cca/ All papers will be peer-reviewed and accepted papers (oral or poster) = will be published in Procedia Computer Science (http://www.elsevier.com/journals/procedia-computer-science/1877-0509/gui= de- for-authors) Looking forward to receiving your full paper/s. Let me know if you have any queries. Kind regards. Prof Ponnadurai Ramasami=20 8th CCA Workshop Organizer Professor Ponnadurai Ramasami | FRSC, FICCE, CSci, CChem | ? = Computational Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University = of Mauritius, R=E9duit, Mauritius | Tel: ) +230 403-7507 | Fax: 6 +230 = 465-6928 | | + ramchemi],[intnet.mu | =FF www.uom.ac.mu | =FF www.uom.ac.mu/sites/CCUOM/index.html | < Chemistry I Computational I Chemistry > =3D Useful results < Chemistry = I Chemistry > =FC Please think about the environment. Print this email only if = required. P Think green. Think before you print. =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01CECBC4.817A5670 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear = Sir/Madam

The 8th Workshop on = Computational Chemistry and Its Applications (8th CCA) will be organized as part of = the International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS = 2014).

ICCS 2014 will be held from 10 = to 12 June 2014 in Cairns, Australia.

http://iccs2014.ivec.org/

You are invited to submit full = paper/s to be considered for the 8th CCA workshop. =

Prof Michelle Coote from the Australian National University, Australia, = will deliver the keynote address entitled "Computer-aided design of stereocontrol agents for radical = polymerization".

All details are available on the = workshop webpage, http://sites.uom.ac.mu/cca/

All papers will be peer-reviewed = and accepted papers (oral or poster) will be published in Procedia Computer = Science (http://www.elsevier.com/journals/procedia-computer= -science/1877-0509/guide-for-authors)

Looking forward to receiving = your full paper/s.

Let me know if you have any = queries.

Kind = regards.

Prof Ponnadurai Ramasami =

8th CCA Workshop = Organizer

Professor Ponnadurai Ramasami | FRSC, FICCE, CSci, CChem | ? Computational Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University = of Mauritius, R=E9duit, Mauritius | Tel: ) +230 403-7507 | Fax: 6 +230 465-6928 = | | + ramchemi],[intnet.mu | =FF= www.uom.ac.mu | =FF www.uom.ac.mu/sites/CCUOM/index.html = |

<= ; Chemistry I Computational I Chemistry > =3D Useful results < = Chemistry I Chemistry >

=FC Please = think about the environment. Print this email only if required.              &= nbsp; 

P  = Think green. Think before you print.

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_003E_01CECBC4.817A5670--