From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 04:43:00 2012 From: "natta poom natta_tachi]^[hotmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: run parallel G09 without Linda (re-send) Message-Id: <-46837-120503044009-14954-Tb3yxJhXmiDvgMcwwE9yPw-,-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: natta poom Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_5ecc78d3-e03f-4835-a6c2-b6645b93faa5_" Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:40:01 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: natta poom [natta_tachi:hotmail.com] --_5ecc78d3-e03f-4835-a6c2-b6645b93faa5_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-874" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Dear All, First of all, I would like to thank Sina Rastegar and Marcel Swart very much for a useful information concerning a title "Keyword GGA-PW91 and pseudo potential for G09" posted previously. Now I have another question. We have purchased G09 with Linda. However, I prefer to run parallel using 8 cores within 1 node (i.e. do not use Linda). My input file is ----------------------- %chk =file.chk %mem=8MW %NProcShared=8 # opt B3LYP/6-31G* ...... ----------------------- In addition, I set environment of GAUSS_LFLAGS as GAUSS_LFLAGS="-mp 2 -nodefile $PBS_NODEFILE" After submitted the job, using the top command in the compute-node I found only 1 processor is running with %CPU of several hundreds. And in the log file, there was a line "Will use up to 8 processors via shared memory" This is correct for parallel without Linda? Also, do I need to set the environment of GAUSS_LFLAGS if Linda is not used? Thank you very much in advance. Regards, Nattawan --_5ecc78d3-e03f-4835-a6c2-b6645b93faa5_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-874" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear All,
First of all, I would like to thank Sina Rastegar and Marcel Swart very much for a useful information concerning a title "Keyword GGA-PW91 and pseudo potential for G09" posted previously.

Now I have another question. We have purchased G09 with Linda. However, I prefer to run parallel using 8 cores within 1 node (i.e. do not use Linda). My input file is
-----------------------
%chk =file.chk
%mem=8MW
%NProcShared=8
# opt B3LYP/6-31G*
......

-----------------------

In addition, I set environment of GAUSS_LFLAGS as
GAUSS_LFLAGS="-mp 2 -nodefile $PBS_NODEFILE"

After submitted the job, using the top command in the compute-node I found only 1 processor is running with %CPU of several hundreds. And in the log file, there was a line "Will use up to 8 processors via shared memory"
 

This is correct for parallel without Linda? Also, do I need to set the environment of GAUSS_LFLAGS if Linda is not used?
Thank you very much in advance.

Regards,
Nattawan

--_5ecc78d3-e03f-4835-a6c2-b6645b93faa5_-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 06:09:00 2012 From: "uekstrom],[gmail.com uekstrom],[gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: run parallel G09 without Linda (re-send) Message-Id: <-46838-120503054519-22231-oC/fxK4Jbgk5mR8xDh+GWw a server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "uekstrom*|*gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 11:45:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "uekstrom**gmail.com" [uekstrom**gmail.com] > After submitted the job, using the top command in the compute-node I found > only 1 processor is running with %CPU of several hundreds. And in the log > file, there was a line "Will use up to 8 processors via shared memory" I don't know anything about Gaussian, but it's normal that top aggregates many threads as one process using > 100% cpu. For example on my two (physical) core machine I usually have 350% cpu utilization for a single process, this means that there are about 3.5 threads running at the same time (presumably using hyper threading). You can play with arguments to top to see all threads (i.e. -H). Regards, Ulf Ekstrom, University of Oslo From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 09:58:00 2012 From: "Nguyen Minh Ly nguyenminhly2209|yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: SN1 Transition state Message-Id: <-46839-120503095240-14029-b1pUvKohaEuN4Nq+ymXzng===server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Nguyen Minh Ly" Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 09:52:38 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Nguyen Minh Ly" [nguyenminhly2209,,yahoo.com] Hi, I'm Ly I'm finding transition state of SN1 reaction with Gaussian. The reaction between I- and tert - butyl clorua. May be I found the structure. Then I run TS (Berny), then IRC. But when I use IRC keyword, the link is died at 130th point. I don't know why. Moreover, the SN1 transition state which I found is different with true structure: + My structure : C in C - Cl is sp2 Carbon + True structure : C in C - Cl is sp3 Carbon Please hepl me. This is my in put file: It take more 6 hours for optimization %chk=C:/check - qst3.chk %mem=40MW %nproc=1 # opt=(calcall,qst3,noeigentest) rhf/sto-3g* scrf=(solvent=water) nosymm geom=connectivity scf=tight Title Card Required 0 1 C C 1 B1 H 2 B2 1 A1 H 2 B3 1 A2 3 D1 H 2 B4 1 A3 3 D2 C 1 B5 2 A4 3 D3 H 6 B6 1 A5 2 D4 H 6 B7 1 A6 2 D5 H 6 B8 1 A7 2 D6 C 1 B9 6 A8 2 D7 H 10 B10 1 A9 6 D8 H 10 B11 1 A10 6 D9 H 10 B12 1 A11 6 D10 Cl 1 B13 6 A12 2 D11 B1 1.52814827 B2 1.09402516 B3 1.09405667 B4 1.09781418 B5 1.52812578 B6 1.09781128 B7 1.09405387 B8 1.09409762 B9 1.52816132 B10 1.09403450 B11 1.09405136 B12 1.09787204 B13 1.86379804 A1 111.16489357 A2 111.18012487 A3 109.31911215 A4 111.79975298 A5 109.32516375 A6 111.20567328 A7 111.18437359 A8 111.82233464 A9 111.17621932 A10 111.18604264 A11 109.34393917 A12 107.02374342 D1 120.98801585 D2 -119.51648824 D3 56.47173516 D4 63.28942083 D5 -177.20415370 D6 -56.21393027 D7 -126.24967089 D8 -177.32788754 D9 -56.34606105 D10 63.17371124 D11 116.86381679 1 2 1.0 6 1.0 10 1.0 14 1.0 2 3 1.0 4 1.0 5 1.0 3 4 5 6 7 1.0 8 1.0 9 1.0 7 8 9 10 11 1.0 12 1.0 13 1.0 11 12 13 14 Title Card Required 0 1 C C 1 B1 H 2 B2 1 A1 H 2 B3 1 A2 3 D1 H 2 B4 1 A3 3 D2 C 1 B5 2 A4 3 D3 H 6 B6 1 A5 2 D4 H 6 B7 1 A6 2 D5 H 6 B8 1 A7 2 D6 C 1 B9 6 A8 2 D7 H 10 B10 1 A9 6 D8 H 10 B11 1 A10 6 D9 H 10 B12 1 A11 6 D10 Cl 1 B13 6 A12 2 D11 B1 1.54000000 B2 1.07000000 B3 1.07000000 B4 1.07000000 B5 1.54000000 B6 1.07000000 B7 1.07000000 B8 1.07000000 B9 1.54000000 B10 1.07000000 B11 1.07000000 B12 1.07000000 B13 6.00000000 A1 109.47122063 A2 109.47122063 A3 109.47122063 A4 120.00000000 A5 109.47122063 A6 109.47122063 A7 109.47122063 A8 120.00000000 A9 109.47122063 A10 109.47122063 A11 109.47122063 A12 90.04196700 D1 120.00000000 D2 -120.00000000 D3 30.00000000 D4 90.00000000 D5 -150.00000000 D6 -30.00000000 D7 180.00000000 D8 -150.00000000 D9 -30.00000000 D10 90.00000000 D11 89.67673056 1 2 1.0 6 1.0 10 1.0 2 3 1.0 4 1.0 5 1.0 3 4 5 6 7 1.0 8 1.0 9 1.0 7 8 9 10 11 1.0 12 1.0 13 1.0 11 12 13 14 Title Card Required 0 1 C C 1 B1 H 2 B2 1 A1 H 2 B3 1 A2 3 D1 H 2 B4 1 A3 3 D2 C 1 B5 2 A4 3 D3 H 6 B6 1 A5 2 D4 H 6 B7 1 A6 2 D5 H 6 B8 1 A7 2 D6 C 1 B9 6 A8 2 D7 H 10 B10 1 A9 6 D8 H 10 B11 1 A10 6 D9 H 10 B12 1 A11 6 D10 Cl 1 B13 6 A12 2 D11 B1 1.52814827 B2 1.09402516 B3 1.09405667 B4 1.09781418 B5 1.52812578 B6 1.09781128 B7 1.09405387 B8 1.09409762 B9 1.52816132 B10 1.09403450 B11 1.09405136 B12 1.09787204 B13 2.50000000 A1 111.16489357 A2 111.18012487 A3 109.31911215 A4 111.79975298 A5 109.32516375 A6 111.20567328 A7 111.18437359 A8 111.82233464 A9 111.17621932 A10 111.18604264 A11 109.34393917 A12 107.02374342 D1 120.98801585 D2 -119.51648824 D3 56.47173516 D4 63.28942083 D5 -177.20415370 D6 -56.21393027 D7 -126.24967089 D8 -177.32788754 D9 -56.34606105 D10 63.17371124 D11 116.86381679 1 2 1.0 6 1.0 10 1.0 2 3 1.0 4 1.0 5 1.0 3 4 5 6 7 1.0 8 1.0 9 1.0 7 8 9 10 11 1.0 12 1.0 13 1.0 11 12 13 14 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 11:19:00 2012 From: "Hans-Ullrich Siehl ullrich.siehl^^^uni-ulm.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: run parallel G09 without Linda (re-send) Message-Id: <-46840-120503094101-3092-Q1WoRvx8roKuIT6SYPEZLQ : server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Hans-Ullrich Siehl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 15:40:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Hans-Ullrich Siehl [ullrich.siehl]_[uni-ulm.de] Dear Nattawan, for shared memory parallelization of Gaussian calculations on one node with multipe cores LINDA is not required, thus GAUSS_LFLAGS is not used. Your input with %NProcShared=xx seems to be coorect. On a linux computer top shows the sum of the load of all cores. A better process viewer for linux is htop http://htop.sourceforge.net/ Htop shows the load of the individual cores. best regards Ulli On 03.05.2012 10:40, natta poom natta_tachi]^[hotmail.com wrote: > Dear All, > First of all, I would like to thank Sina Rastegar and Marcel Swart very > much for a useful information concerning a title "Keyword GGA-PW91 and > pseudo potential for G09" posted previously. > > Now I have another question. We have purchased G09 with Linda. However, > I prefer to run parallel using 8 cores within 1 node (i.e. do not use > Linda). My input file is > ----------------------- > %chk =file.chk > %mem=8MW > %NProcShared=8 > # opt B3LYP/6-31G* > ...... > > ----------------------- > > In addition, I set environment of GAUSS_LFLAGS as > GAUSS_LFLAGS="-mp 2 -nodefile $PBS_NODEFILE" > > After submitted the job, using the top command in the compute-node I > found only 1 processor is running with %CPU of several hundreds. And in > the log file, there was a line "Will use up to 8 processors via shared > memory" > > > This is correct for parallel without Linda? Also, do I need to set the > environment of GAUSS_LFLAGS if Linda is not used? > Tha! nk you very much in advance. > > Regards, > Nattawan > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 12:47:00 2012 From: "Andrew Yeung andrew.yeung(a)chem.tamu.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: SN1 Transition state Message-Id: <-46841-120503124502-19560-gTiDZFcRGYazRq3OTiQFQA-#-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Andrew Yeung Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:44:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Andrew Yeung [andrew.yeung:-:chem.tamu.edu] I'm trying to understand a little better. What reaction are you trying to model? Is this correct: tBu-Cl + I(-) --> tBu(+) + Cl(-) +I(-) --> tBu-I + Cl(-) I looked at your input file and it seems a little strange - structure 1 shows a "normal" t-BuCl; structure 2 is sp2 t-Bu---------------Cl (very long); structure 3 shows t-Bu---Cl. I'm not sure what sort of TS you're looking for. What was the TS you found? What sort of imaginary vibrations did you have? I had a bit of time and I did a quick scan of the C-Cl bond length from 1.156 to 2.156 angstroms (probably should have gone a little further) using B3LYP/6-31G, and I did not see any apparent energy barrier. I suspect the kinetic barrier for the overall reaction is simply the heterolysis of the C-Cl bond. In that case, you can simply calculate the energies for t-BuCl, t-Bu(+), and Cl(-) separately, and determine how much energy it takes to break that C-Cl bond? Andrew Yeung Donald J. Darensbourg Research Group Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University 3255 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-3255 Tel: 979 845 4837 On 2012-05-03 8:52 AM, Nguyen Minh Ly nguyenminhly2209|yahoo.com wrote: > Sent to CCL by: "Nguyen Minh Ly" [nguyenminhly2209,,yahoo.com] > Hi, I'm Ly > I'm finding transition state of SN1 reaction with Gaussian. > The reaction between I- and tert - butyl clorua. > May be I found the structure. Then I run TS (Berny), then IRC. But when I use > IRC keyword, the link is died at 130th point. I don't know why. > > Moreover, the SN1 transition state which I found is different with true > structure: > + My structure : C in C - Cl is sp2 Carbon > + True structure : C in C - Cl is sp3 Carbon > > Please hepl me. > This is my in put file: It take more 6 hours for optimization > > > %chk=C:/check - qst3.chk > %mem=40MW > %nproc=1 > # opt=(calcall,qst3,noeigentest) rhf/sto-3g* scrf=(solvent=water) nosymm > geom=connectivity scf=tight > > Title Card Required > > 0 1 > C > C 1 B1 > H 2 B2 1 A1 > H 2 B3 1 A2 3 > D1 > H 2 B4 1 A3 3 > D2 > C 1 B5 2 A4 3 > D3 > H 6 B6 1 A5 2 > D4 > H 6 B7 1 A6 2 > D5 > H 6 B8 1 A7 2 > D6 > C 1 B9 6 A8 2 > D7 > H 10 B10 1 A9 6 > D8 > H 10 B11 1 A10 6 > D9 > H 10 B12 1 A11 6 > D10 > Cl 1 B13 6 A12 2 > D11 > > B1 1.52814827 > B2 1.09402516 > B3 1.09405667 > B4 1.09781418 > B5 1.52812578 > B6 1.09781128 > B7 1.09405387 > B8 1.09409762 > B9 1.52816132 > B10 1.09403450 > B11 1.09405136 > B12 1.09787204 > B13 1.86379804 > A1 111.16489357 > A2 111.18012487 > A3 109.31911215 > A4 111.79975298 > A5 109.32516375 > A6 111.20567328 > A7 111.18437359 > A8 111.82233464 > A9 111.17621932 > A10 111.18604264 > A11 109.34393917 > A12 107.02374342 > D1 120.98801585 > D2 -119.51648824 > D3 56.47173516 > D4 63.28942083 > D5 -177.20415370 > D6 -56.21393027 > D7 -126.24967089 > D8 -177.32788754 > D9 -56.34606105 > D10 63.17371124 > D11 116.86381679 > > 1 2 1.0 6 1.0 10 1.0 14 1.0 > 2 3 1.0 4 1.0 5 1.0 > 3 > 4 > 5 > 6 7 1.0 8 1.0 9 1.0 > 7 > 8 > 9 > 10 11 1.0 12 1.0 13 1.0 > 11 > 12 > 13 > 14 > > Title Card Required > > 0 1 > C > C 1 B1 > H 2 B2 1 A1 > H 2 B3 1 A2 3 > D1 > H 2 B4 1 A3 3 > D2 > C 1 B5 2 A4 3 > D3 > H 6 B6 1 A5 2 > D4 > H 6 B7 1 A6 2 > D5 > H 6 B8 1 A7 2 > D6 > C 1 B9 6 A8 2 > D7 > H 10 B10 1 A9 6 > D8 > H 10 B11 1 A10 6 > D9 > H 10 B12 1 A11 6 > D10 > Cl 1 B13 6 A12 2 > D11 > > B1 1.54000000 > B2 1.07000000 > B3 1.07000000 > B4 1.07000000 > B5 1.54000000 > B6 1.07000000 > B7 1.07000000 > B8 1.07000000 > B9 1.54000000 > B10 1.07000000 > B11 1.07000000 > B12 1.07000000 > B13 6.00000000 > A1 109.47122063 > A2 109.47122063 > A3 109.47122063 > A4 120.00000000 > A5 109.47122063 > A6 109.47122063 > A7 109.47122063 > A8 120.00000000 > A9 109.47122063 > A10 109.47122063 > A11 109.47122063 > A12 90.04196700 > D1 120.00000000 > D2 -120.00000000 > D3 30.00000000 > D4 90.00000000 > D5 -150.00000000 > D6 -30.00000000 > D7 180.00000000 > D8 -150.00000000 > D9 -30.00000000 > D10 90.00000000 > D11 89.67673056 > > 1 2 1.0 6 1.0 10 1.0 > 2 3 1.0 4 1.0 5 1.0 > 3 > 4 > 5 > 6 7 1.0 8 1.0 9 1.0 > 7 > 8 > 9 > 10 11 1.0 12 1.0 13 1.0 > 11 > 12 > 13 > 14 > > Title Card Required > > 0 1 > C > C 1 B1 > H 2 B2 1 A1 > H 2 B3 1 A2 3 > D1 > H 2 B4 1 A3 3 > D2 > C 1 B5 2 A4 3 > D3 > H 6 B6 1 A5 2 > D4 > H 6 B7 1 A6 2 > D5 > H 6 B8 1 A7 2 > D6 > C 1 B9 6 A8 2 > D7 > H 10 B10 1 A9 6 > D8 > H 10 B11 1 A10 6 > D9 > H 10 B12 1 A11 6 > D10 > Cl 1 B13 6 A12 2 > D11 > > B1 1.52814827 > B2 1.09402516 > B3 1.09405667 > B4 1.09781418 > B5 1.52812578 > B6 1.09781128 > B7 1.09405387 > B8 1.09409762 > B9 1.52816132 > B10 1.09403450 > B11 1.09405136 > B12 1.09787204 > B13 2.50000000 > A1 111.16489357 > A2 111.18012487 > A3 109.31911215 > A4 111.79975298 > A5 109.32516375 > A6 111.20567328 > A7 111.18437359 > A8 111.82233464 > A9 111.17621932 > A10 111.18604264 > A11 109.34393917 > A12 107.02374342 > D1 120.98801585 > D2 -119.51648824 > D3 56.47173516 > D4 63.28942083 > D5 -177.20415370 > D6 -56.21393027 > D7 -126.24967089 > D8 -177.32788754 > D9 -56.34606105 > D10 63.17371124 > D11 116.86381679 > > 1 2 1.0 6 1.0 10 1.0 > 2 3 1.0 4 1.0 5 1.0 > 3 > 4 > 5 > 6 7 1.0 8 1.0 9 1.0 > 7 > 8 > 9 > 10 11 1.0 12 1.0 13 1.0 > 11 > 12 > 13 > 14> > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 14:47:00 2012 From: "Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale walecomuk^_^yahoo.co.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Large value of equilibrium constants Message-Id: <-46842-120503144223-3267-r3AiRm4MFdn8CpDTvPF7/Q[a]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="542325855-546353906-1336070535=:64187" Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 19:42:15 +0100 (BST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale [walecomuk!A!yahoo.co.uk] --542325855-546353906-1336070535=:64187 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Colleagues,=0AI carried out some theoretical calculations on complexat= ion of some transition metal ions with a polypyridine ligand and I predicte= d the equilibrium constants for the assumed reversible reactions. I got val= ues of K as high as 1 x 10^400 and in fact, an infinite value in one case.W= hat do you think about these large values? I interpretated them to mean tha= t the reactions are essentially irreversible.=0AThank you all.=0A=0A=A0=0AO= lasunkanmi Lukman Olawale=0A________________________________=0ACurrent Addr= ess:=0ADepartment of Chemistry,=0AObafemi Awolowo University,=0AIle-Ife, Os= un State.=0ANigeria.=0A=0A+234-0-80-52401564 Or +234-0-80-67161091=0A______= __________________________ --542325855-546353906-1336070535=:64187 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Colle= agues,
I carried out some theoretical calculations o= n complexation of some transition metal ions with a polypyridine ligand and= I predicted the equilibrium constants for the assumed reversible reactions= . I got values of K as high as 1 x 10^400 and in fact, an infinite value in= one case.What do you think about these large values? I interpretated them = to mean that the reactions are essentially irreversible.
<= span>Thank you all.
 
Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale<= br>
Current Address:
Department of Chemistry,
Obafemi Awolowo University,
Nigeria= .
+234-0-80-52401564 Or +234-0= -80-67161091

--542325855-546353906-1336070535=:64187-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 15:21:00 2012 From: "John Keller jwkeller~~alaska.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Tinker Force Field Explorer - installation Message-Id: <-46843-120503150451-22583-qpCFFO4+pPwQSr7c/eeRQg!^!server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "John Keller" Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:04:39 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "John Keller" [jwkeller__alaska.edu] Where are the installation files for the Tinker Force Field Explorer (FFE) program? I cannot see them on the Tinker website. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 15:56:00 2012 From: "Andrew Yeung andrew.yeung]=[chem.tamu.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Large value of equilibrium constants Message-Id: <-46844-120503154350-2953-0iJJwONwauzqU8L0Cs57tw]_[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Andrew Yeung Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050907060602080509020301" Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 14:43:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Andrew Yeung [andrew.yeung-$-chem.tamu.edu] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050907060602080509020301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How did you do the calculation? Did you find the differences in free energy between the two species, and apply Delta G = - RT ln K? Or is your program able to give you equilibrium constants directly? Andrew Yeung Donald J. Darensbourg Research Group Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University 3255 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-3255 Tel: 979 845 4837 On 2012-05-03 1:42 PM, Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale walecomuk^_^yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > I carried out some theoretical calculations on complexation of some > transition metal ions with a polypyridine ligand and I predicted the > equilibrium constants for the assumed reversible reactions. I got > values of K as high as 1 x 10^400 and in fact, an infinite value in > one case.What do you think about these large values? I interpretated > them to mean that the reactions are essentially irreversible. > Thank you all. > Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Current Address: > Department of Chemistry, > Obafemi Awolowo University, > Ile-Ife, Osun State. > Nigeria. > +234-0-80-52401564 Or +234-0-80-67161091 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------050907060602080509020301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How did you do the calculation? Did you find the differences in free energy between the two species, and apply Delta G = - RT ln K?

Or is your program able to give you equilibrium constants directly?
Andrew Yeung
Donald J. Darensbourg Research Group
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University
3255 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-3255

Tel: 979 845 4837

On 2012-05-03 1:42 PM, Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale walecomuk^_^yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I carried out some theoretical calculations on complexation of some transition metal ions with a polypyridine ligand and I predicted the equilibrium constants for the assumed reversible reactions. I got values of K as high as 1 x 10^400 and in fact, an infinite value in one case.What do you think about these large values? I interpretated them to mean that the reactions are essentially irreversible.
Thank you all.
 
Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale

Current Address:
Department of Chemistry,
Obafemi Awolowo University,
Ile-Ife, Osun State.
Nigeria.
+234-0-80-52401564 Or +234-0-80-67161091

--------------050907060602080509020301-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 16:32:01 2012 From: "Julien C Thibault julien.thibault : utah.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Managing and sharing biomolecular simulation data Message-Id: <-46845-120503155100-10334-lKNveFt+aXAj3qX5meW6pA=-=server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Julien C Thibault" Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:50:58 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Julien C Thibault" [julien.thibault]![utah.edu] Hi all, Im currently working with the Cheatham Lab at the University of Utah (http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/), trying to develop a system that would facilitate biomolecular simulation data management and sharing at the community level. We are now focusing on AMBER data but we plan to extend it to other software and QM calculations. We prepared a survey to find out which data elements are important to index simulation data and allow community-level queries. You can take the survey here (it takes about 4 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/FNZLJVT The vision is to eventually make this open source and open access, so your feedback is important. Thanks, Julien Thibault University of Utah Department of Biomedical Informatics 26 South 2000 East Room 5775 HSEB Salt Lake City, UT 84112 julien.thibault%utah.edu From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 17:06:00 2012 From: "cina foroutan canyslopus()yahoo.co.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Large value of equilibrium constants Message-Id: <-46846-120503164810-13813-2XncskCUWmvu6AAUGhs0Jg : server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: cina foroutan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-976153366-2033782622-1336078082=:78578" Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 21:48:02 +0100 (BST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: cina foroutan [canyslopus{=}yahoo.co.uk] ---976153366-2033782622-1336078082=:78578 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Olasunkanmi,=0A=0AWould you please mention at which theoretical level = you performed the computations. Is it an ab initio or DFT or it is of semi-= empirical/molecular mechanic level? This might be a systematic error due to= the computational level. Would you please also mention the amount of the b= inding energies between the metal and ligands. If the binding energy is ver= y large, you must improve your computational level.=0ASee this reference as= an example of wrong computational level selection: Sensors, 2007, 7, 3119.= =0A=0AGood Luck!=0ACina=0A*************************************************= ***********************************************=0A=0ACina Foroutan-Nejad, P= h.D.=0ASchool of Chemistry, College of Science=0AUniversity of Tehran, Tehr= an, Iran=0Ahttp://independent.academia.edu/CinaForoutanNejad=0A=0A=0A=0A___= _____________________________=0A From: Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale walecomuk= ^_^yahoo.co.uk =0ATo: "Foroutan-Nejad, Cina -id#47= z-" =0ASent: Thursday, 3 May 2012, 22:42=0ASubject= : CCL: Large value of equilibrium constants=0A =0A=0ADear Colleagues,=0AI c= arried out some theoretical calculations on complexation of some transition= metal ions with a polypyridine ligand and I predicted the equilibrium cons= tants for the assumed reversible reactions. I got values of K as high as 1 = x 10^400 and in fact, an infinite value in one case.What do you think about= these large values? I interpretated them to mean that the reactions are es= sentially irreversible.=0AThank you all.=0A=0A=A0=0AOlasunkanmi Lukman Olaw= ale=0A________________________________=0ACurrent Address:=0ADepartment of C= hemistry,=0AObafemi Awolowo University,=0AIle-Ife, Osun State.=0ANigeria.= =0A=0A+234-0-80-52401564 Or +234-0-80-67161091=0A__________________________= ______ ---976153366-2033782622-1336078082=:78578 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Olasunkanmi,

Would you please mention at= which theoretical level you performed the computations. Is it an ab initio= or DFT or it is of semi-empirical/molecular mechanic level? This might be = a systematic error due to the computational level. Would you please also me= ntion the amount of the binding energies between the metal and ligands. If = the binding energy is very large, you must improve your computational level= .
See this reference as an example of wrong computat= ional level selection: Sensors, 2007, 7, 3119.

<= /span>
Good Luck!
Cina
<= div>*****************************************************************= *******************************
Cina Foroutan-Nejad, Ph.D.
School of Chemistry, College = of Science
University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran=
http://independent.academia.edu/CinaForoutanNejad



From: Olasunkanmi Lukman Olawale walecomuk^_^ya= hoo.co.uk <owner-chemistry_+_ccl.net>
To: "Foroutan-Nejad, Cina " <canyslopus_+_yaho= o.co.uk>
Sent: Thu= rsday, 3 May 2012, 22:42
Subject:= CCL: Large value of equilibrium constants
Dear Colleagues,
I carried out some theoretical = calculations on complexation of some transition metal ions with a polypyrid= ine ligand and I predicted the equilibrium constants for the assumed revers= ible reactions. I got values of K as high as 1 x 10^400 and in fact, an inf= inite value in one case.What do you think about these large values? I inter= pretated them to mean that the reactions are essentially irreversible.
Thank you all.
 
Olasunkanmi Lukman Olaw= ale

Current Address:
Department of Chemistry,
Obafemi Awolowo University,
Ile= -Ife, Osun State.
Nigeria.
+234-0-80-52401564 Or +234-0-80-67161091


---976153366-2033782622-1336078082=:78578-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu May 3 19:53:00 2012 From: "David A Mannock dmannock**ualberta.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: run parallel G09 without Linda (re-send) Message-Id: <-46847-120503172423-21531-gSEhQ70DW/K6Zx1kT8UIAQ[a]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: David A Mannock Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554de6008d29004bf286d42 Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:24:15 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: David A Mannock [dmannock^ualberta.ca] --bcaec554de6008d29004bf286d42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi! I am just running an Opt+ Freq calculation in G09. Top shows the most cpu intensive applications on the top line and presently shows 1199% CPU and 90.2% memory in use. This means that the 12 cores on my AMD motherboard and 90% of 7GB (8GB installed) are being used in the calculation. This may be different for Intel CPUs. Occasionally results will be written to disk and those numbers will fall slightly or a subroutine will be called that uses only a single core, this is normal. I believe that G09 may have some limitations above 32 cores. In my new server which contains 64 cores, I have installed 128 GB of memory and online it suggests leaving 4GB free. The rule for onboard memory in smaller systems is: 2* (# cores) - 1GB. Thus, for my present system, I may have to add more DDR2 to the motherboard to improve the calculation efficiency. Dave On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:45 AM, uekstrom],[gmail.com uekstrom],[gmail.com < owner-chemistry!^!ccl.net> wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "uekstrom**gmail.com" [uekstrom**gmail.com] > > After submitted the job, using the top command in the compute-node I > found > > only 1 processor is running with %CPU of several hundreds. And in the log > > file, there was a line "Will use up to 8 processors via shared memory" > > I don't know anything about Gaussian, but it's normal that top > aggregates many threads as one process using > 100% cpu. For example > on my two (physical) core machine I usually have 350% cpu utilization > for a single process, this means that there are about 3.5 threads > running at the same time (presumably using hyper threading). You can > play with arguments to top to see all threads (i.e. -H). > > Regards, > Ulf Ekstrom, University of Oslo> > > --bcaec554de6008d29004bf286d42 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I am just running an Opt+ Freq calculation in G09. Top shows the most c= pu intensive applications on the top line and presently shows 1199% CPU and= 90.2% memory in use. This means that the 12 cores on my AMD motherboard an= d 90% of 7GB (8GB installed) are being used in the calculation. This may be= different for Intel CPUs. Occasionally results will be written to disk and= those numbers will fall slightly or a subroutine will be called that uses = only a single core, this is normal. I believe that G09 may have some limita= tions above 32 cores. In my new server which contains 64 cores, I have inst= alled 128 GB of memory and online it suggests leaving 4GB free. The rule fo= r onboard memory in smaller systems is: 2* (# cores) - 1GB. Thus, for my pr= esent system, I may have to add more DDR2 to the motherboard to improve the= calculation efficiency. Dave

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:45 AM, uekstrom],[<= a href=3D"http://gmail.com">gmail.com uekstrom],[gmail.com <owner-chemistry!^!ccl.net> wrote:<= br>

Sent to CCL by: "uekstrom**gmail.com" [uekstrom**gmail.com]
> After submitted the job, using the top command in the compute-node I f= ound
> only 1 processor is running with %CPU of several hundreds. And in the = log
> file, there was a line "Will use up to 8 processors via shared me= mory"

I don't know anything about Gaussian, but it's normal that top
aggregates many threads as one process using > 100% cpu. For example
on my two (physical) core machine I usually have 350% cpu utilization
for a single process, this means that there are about 3.5 threads
running at the same time (presumably using hyper threading). You can
play with arguments to top to see all threads (i.e. -H).

Regards,
Ulf Ekstrom, University of Oslo



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY!^!ccl.n= et or use:
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEM= ISTRY-REQUEST!^!ccl.net or use
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/co= nferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
=A0 =A0 =A0
h= ttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/



--bcaec554de6008d29004bf286d42--