From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 01:22:00 2011 From: "Eliz Lam elizabeth.shlam~!~gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Time consuming frequency calculations problem Message-Id: <-44365-110414011844-12839-9Ep1ymlGYRPMV5enu3A23Q_+_server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Eliz Lam" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:18:41 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Eliz Lam" [elizabeth.shlam%a%gmail.com] Hi all, I've been trying with the frequency calculations with gaussian03 for a molecule with 207 atoms to verify whether the geometry obtained from optimisation is a minimum. However, it seems that the frequency calculations have not been completed even after three days. I wonder is there something wrong, since I haven't done a frequency calculations which requires so much time? Thanks! Eliz From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 01:56:00 2011 From: "psavita,,crlindia.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: DFT program for second derivatives using periodic boundaries and GTOs Message-Id: <-44366-110414011459-25285-+kLRHPYrfJDI8PzOibj/hg]^[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: psavita(a)crlindia.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:50:03 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: psavita%%crlindia.com
Hello Bernd,

I wonder whether there is any code that can= do SCF using GTO's and periodic boundary conditions.
In case you know, = please let me know.

Thanks and Regards,

= Savita PundlikComputati= onal Materials Applied Researc= h Group
Computational Research Laboratories Ltd.,=

Taco House, Damle Path, Off Law College Road
Pune - 411004, India.



-----owner-chemistry+psavita=3D=3Dcrlindia.com(0)ccl.net wrote: -----=

To: "= Pundlik, Savita Sunil " <psavita(0)crlindia.com>
From: "Ber= nd Doser doser%avmatsim.de" <owner-chemistry(0)ccl.net>
Sent by:= owner-chemistry+psavita=3D=3Dcrlindia.com(0)ccl= .net
Date: 04/13/2011 07:10PM
Subject: CCL: DFT program for secon= d derivatives using periodic boundaries and GTOs


Sent to CCL by: "Bernd  Doser= " [doser[]avmatsim.de]
Dear CCL users,

I am searching for a DFT p= rogram, which has the ability to calculate organic molecules considering fo= llowing demands:

- periodic boundary conditions,
- Gauss-type ato= mic orbitals, and
- analytically second derivatives with respect to cell= parameters and atomic positions.

All comments are welcome.

B= est regards,
Bernd Doser



-=3D This is automatically added= to each message by the mailing script =3D-
To recover the email address= of the author of the message, please change
the strange characters on t= he top line to the (0) sign. You can also
look up the X-Original-From: lin= e in the mail header.

E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY(0)ccl.net or u= se:
      http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send=5Fccl=5Fmessage

E-mail to administrators:
CHEMISTRY-REQUEST(0)ccl.net or u= se
      http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send=5Fccl=5Fmessage
      
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/= sub=5Funsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 
Conferences: http://serv= er.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/

Search Messages:= http://www.= ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml

If your mail bounces fro= m CCL with 5.7.1 error, check:
      http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTF= I: http://w= ww.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/


=0D
= From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 04:03:00 2011 From: "Ulrike Salzner salzner]~[gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Comparison of Energy Levels with PES Message-Id: <-44367-110414040059-12632-u42KCBHYc17zrgz7Sakpnw ~ server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Ulrike Salzner Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636831e7ef2d64504a0dc52f9 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:00:51 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Ulrike Salzner [salzner-#-gmail.com] --001636831e7ef2d64504a0dc52f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear Sanjay, in principle the answer is yes. There are a lot of issues, however. We have published a paper about this recently (J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 231101). Please check also the references in there, especially the ones from Baerends et al. Regards, Ulrike On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Sanjay Bharathwaj computationalchemist_+_ gmail.com wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > I am trying to simulate the photo electron spectra > for which i am using Density Functional Theory. > > I wanted to ask you, if we can compare the energies of the > orbital obtained from DFT calculations to that of the energy levels > where peaks are obtained on the spectrum. > > For example, in my experiment spectrum, i have a peak at 205 eV, and > i have a orbital on my calculation at -207 eV. > > Is the both can be compared directly. > which assumes that the electron on 207 eV is released on the experiments. > > If not, which factors should i consider to simulate the PES. > > look forward for your favorable reply. > > Best regards, > Sanjay > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Dr. Sanjay Bharathwaj Kumar, > Dharmendra Institute of Technology, > India. > -- Assoc. Prof. Ulrike Salzner Department of Chemistry Bilkent University 06800 Bilkent, Ankara --001636831e7ef2d64504a0dc52f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Sanjay,
in principle the answer is yes. There are a lot of issues, = however. We have published a paper about this recently (J. Chem. Phys. 2009= , 131, 231101). Please check also the references in there, especially the o= nes from Baerends et al.
Regards,
Ulrike

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 a= t 12:25 PM, Sanjay Bharathwaj computationalchemist_+_gmail.com <owner-chemistry##ccl.net> wrote:
Dear=A0Colleagues,

I am = trying to simulate the photo electron spectra=A0
for which i am u= sing Density Functional Theory.

I wanted to ask you, if we can compare the energies of = the
orbital obtained from DFT calculations to that of the energy levels
where peaks are obtained on the spectrum.

= For example, in my experiment spectrum, i have a peak at 205 eV, and
i have a orbital on my calculation at -207 eV.

Is the both can be compared directly.
which assumes that the el= ectron on 207 eV is released on the experiments.

If not, which factors should i consider to simulate the=A0PES.
look forward for your=A0favorable=A0reply.

Best regards,
Sanjay







--
R= egards,
Dr. Sanjay Bharathwaj Kumar,
Dharmendra Institute of Technolo= gy,
India.



--
Assoc. Prof. Ulr= ike Salzner
Department of Chemistry
Bilkent University
06800 Bilke= nt, Ankara
--001636831e7ef2d64504a0dc52f9-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 05:05:00 2011 From: "ABHISHEK SHAHI shahi.abhishek1984/./gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Time consuming frequency calculations problem Message-Id: <-44368-110414050249-27041-VdBkorUuw4JkdzUK7ZxsIw__server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: ABHISHEK SHAHI Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd9901b3690204a0dd2f7d Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:32:35 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: ABHISHEK SHAHI [shahi.abhishek1984%a%gmail.com] --0016e6dd9901b3690204a0dd2f7d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Use freq=noraman in route section (next time). It will save your ~30% computation time. And we don't need raman frequency to check the minima On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Eliz Lam elizabeth.shlam~!~gmail.com < owner-chemistry[*]ccl.net> wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Eliz Lam" [elizabeth.shlam%a%gmail.com] > Hi all, > > I've been trying with the frequency calculations with gaussian03 for a > molecule with 207 atoms to verify whether the geometry obtained from > optimisation is a minimum. However, it seems that the frequency > calculations have not been completed even after three days. I wonder is > there something wrong, since I haven't done a frequency calculations which > requires so much time? > > Thanks! > Eliz> > > --0016e6dd9901b3690204a0dd2f7d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Use freq=3Dnoraman in route section (next time). It will save your ~30% com= putation time. And we don't need raman frequency to check the minima

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Eliz L= am elizabeth.shlam~!~gmail.com <owner-chemistry[*]ccl= .net> wrote:

Sent to CCL by: "Eliz =A0Lam" [elizabeth.shlam%a%gmail.com]
Hi all,

I've been trying with the frequency calculations with gaussian03 for a = molecule with 207 atoms to verify whether the geometry obtained from optimi= sation is a minimum. =A0However, it seems that the frequency calculations h= ave not been completed even after three days. =A0I wonder is there somethin= g wrong, since I haven't done a frequency calculations which requires s= o much time?

Thanks!
Eliz



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY[*]ccl.n= et or use:
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEM= ISTRY-REQUEST[*]ccl.net or use
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/co= nferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
=A0 =A0 =A0
h= ttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/



--0016e6dd9901b3690204a0dd2f7d-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 08:08:00 2011 From: "Wojciech Kolodziejczyk dziecial__icnanotox.org" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Time consuming frequency calculations problem Message-Id: <-44369-110414080503-13657-Q3vxmpYnvNr+WbJvELewHg:-:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Wojciech Kolodziejczyk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:04:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Wojciech Kolodziejczyk [dziecial]^[icnanotox.org] Hi It looks normal for me. I used to calculate molecule with about 80-100 atoms with LAN2DZ basis set using B3LYP. It took about 12 or 16 days to get frequencies. But don't look at nuber of atoms. The most important thing is number of basis functions (NBas=). It tells you how much time the calculations will last. Sometimes is better to use numerical because you can restart them in case of machine problem. Have a nice day W. 2011/4/14 Eliz Lam elizabeth.shlam~!~gmail.com : > > Sent to CCL by: "Eliz  Lam" [elizabeth.shlam%a%gmail.com] > Hi all, > > I've been trying with the frequency calculations with gaussian03 for a molecule with 207 atoms to verify whether the geometry obtained from optimisation is a minimum.  However, it seems that the frequency calculations have not been completed even after three days.  I wonder is there something wrong, since I haven't done a frequency calculations which requires so much time? > > Thanks! > Eliz>      http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message>      http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message>      http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml>      http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt> > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 08:42:00 2011 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tobias_Schl=F6der?= tobias.schloeder---cpg.uni-freiburg.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: converting .wfn files Message-Id: <-44370-110414074653-20393-+levQvfSkSHQQiSC9EbEag{}server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tobias_Schl=F6der?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:45:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tobias_Schl=F6der?= [tobias.schloeder]=[cpg.uni-freiburg.de] Dear all, I'd like to ask if someone knows a tool that converts gaussian wavefunction files (.wfn) to other formats, such as e.g. MolPro, CFOUR, Turbomole, etc. Thanks in advance for suggestions Tobias -- Tobias Schlöder Institut für Anorganische Chemie Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Albertstr. 21 79104 Freiburg i. Br., Germany Phone: + 49 (0) 761 203 6138 email: tobias.schloeder(at)cpg.uni-freiburg.de From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 09:17:00 2011 From: "Roman Affentranger roman#%#douglasconnect.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: OpenTox Online Tutorial: Predict the toxicity of a molecule using ToxPredict. (Wed, 20 April, 15:00 CEST) Message-Id: <-44371-110414033841-619-2BfhjfAtIk0rhyuld+gRaQ|*|server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Roman Affentranger Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53f97853dd0ad04a0dc0381 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:38:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Roman Affentranger [roman.:.douglasconnect.com] --bcaec53f97853dd0ad04a0dc0381 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear All: OpenTox recently announced a series of online seminars and interactive tutorials on topics related to predictive toxicology using a virtual conferencing system supporting desktop sharing and voice. The tutorials are part of the EU FP7 project OpenTox (www.opentox.org), which aims at developing an interoperable open source predictive toxicology framework which may be used as an enabling platform for the creation of predictive toxicology applications. The next tutorial will be held *Wednesday, 20 April, at 15:00 CEST*, and is aiming at end users who want to use the OpenTox application ToxPredict to predict the toxicity of a molecule, or to explore existing data in OpenTox. The ToxPredict tutorial includes demonstration of the following functionalities: Defining the structure - Querying by chemical name or other identifiers - Structure search - exact, substructure, similarity - Uploading own set of structures and assigning access rights - Using previously uploaded sets of structures Running predictions - Individually for a compound - Batch mode Exploring toxicity data - Existing toxicity data (multiple endpoints) for a given compound. - Browsing toxicity datasets. - Reports Following the demonstration, every participant may use the system to perform the same activities. Exercise outline and example files will be provided. Requirements: Web browser (Firefox, Internet Explorer, Chrome, Safari) with javascript enabled Java enabled (in order to use structure diagram editor) Preferred, but optional : a user account on opentox.org site Participation in these online events involves no registration fee. For more information, as well as to register, visit http://www.opentox.org/meet/opentoxonline. Best regards, Roman Affentranger -- Dr. Roman Affentranger R&D Activity Coordinator Douglas Connect Baermeggenweg 14 4314 Zeiningen Switzerland --bcaec53f97853dd0ad04a0dc0381 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All:

OpenTox recently announced a series of online=20 seminars and interactive tutorials on topics related to predictive=20 toxicology using a virtual conferencing system supporting desktop=20 sharing and voice. The tutorials are part of the EU FP7 project OpenTox (www.opentox.org), which aims at developing an interoperable open source predictive=20 toxicology framework=A0which may be used as an enabling=A0platform for the= =20 creation of predictive toxicology applications.

The next tutorial will be held Wednesday, 20 April, at 15:00 CEST, and is aiming at end users= who want to=20 use the OpenTox application ToxPredict to predict the toxicity of a=20 molecule, or to explore existing data in OpenTox.

The ToxP= redict tutorial includes demonstration of the following functionalities:

Defining the structure
- Querying by chemical name or other identifiers
- Structure search - exact, substructure, similarity
- Uploading own set of structures and assigning access rights
- Using previously uploaded sets of structures=A0

Running predictions=A0
- Individually for a compound
- Batch mode

Exploring toxicity data
- Existing toxicity data (multiple endpoints) for a given compoun= d.
- Browsing toxicity datasets.
- Reports=A0

Following the demonstration, every participant may use the system= to perform the same activities.=A0
Exercise outline and example files will be provided.=A0

Requirements:=A0
Web browser (Firefox, Internet Explorer, Chrome, Safari) with jav= ascript enabled=A0
Java enabled (in order to use structure diagram editor)
Preferred, but optional : a user account on opentox.org site=A0


Participation in these online events involves no registration fee.
For more information, as well as to register, visit http://www.opentox.org/mee= t/opentoxonline.


Best regards,
Roman Affentranger

--
Dr. Roman Affentranger
R&D Activity Coordinator
Dougla= s Connect
Baermeggenweg 14
4314 Zeiningen
Switzerland
--bcaec53f97853dd0ad04a0dc0381-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 09:52:00 2011 From: "Gkourmpis, Thomas Thomas.Gkourmpis^^^borealisgroup.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Time consuming frequency calculations problem Message-Id: <-44372-110414021005-8362-sX6VHTxy7t0ZLLIfO2qvyg],[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Gkourmpis, Thomas" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:09:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Gkourmpis, Thomas" [Thomas.Gkourmpis . borealisgroup.com] Eliz Hi Generally speaking frequency calculations can be very time consuming depending on the number of molecules in the system, the potential energy surface around the minima and of course the level of theory and basis set you are using. Your system is quite big and if you're using MP-type methods with expanded basis sets waiting for a few days is perfectly natural (especially in less powerful computers). Once I had to wait for a week! As a rule of thumb as long as the program is working and doesn't produce any error or serious warning messages leave it alone. I hope this is helpful Thomas -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry+thomas.gkourmpis==borealisgroup.com(!)ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry+thomas.gkourmpis==borealisgroup.com(!)ccl.net] On Behalf Of Eliz Lam elizabeth.shlam~!~gmail.com Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:19 AM To: Gkourmpis, Thomas Subject: CCL:G: Time consuming frequency calculations problem Sent to CCL by: "Eliz Lam" [elizabeth.shlam%a%gmail.com] Hi all, I've been trying with the frequency calculations with gaussian03 for a molecule with 207 atoms to verify whether the geometry obtained from optimisation is a minimum. However, it seems that the frequency calculations have not been completed even after three days. I wonder is there something wrong, since I haven't done a frequency calculations which requires so much time? Thanks! Elizhttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txtThis Email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or the entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this Email by error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any storage device. Borealis extends no warranties and makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. It is the customer's responsibility to inspect and test our products and technical advice in order to satisfy itself as to the suitability of the products and technical advice for the customer's particular purpose. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 10:27:00 2011 From: "P.D.Jarowski{:}surrey.ac.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Diffuse functions Message-Id: <-44373-110414045252-19216-dUrFERp/aEfNhmUYT4fk1g/a\server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7573C7C772F1CB48A79EA49CDD41DD3DF39C2AB555EXMB01CMSsurr_" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:52:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: [P.D.Jarowski]_[surrey.ac.uk] --_000_7573C7C772F1CB48A79EA49CDD41DD3DF39C2AB555EXMB01CMSsurr_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGVhciBhbGwsDQoNCkkgYW0gZmFjaW5nIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBpbiB0aGUgbW9sZWN1bGFyIG9yYml0 YWwgcmVwcmVzZW50YXRpb24gb2Ygc29tZSBkaXBvbGFyIGNocm9tb3Bob3JlcyB1c2luZyB0d28g ZGlmZmVyZW50IG1ldGhvZHMuIEluIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBjYXNlIHdlIGhhdmUgYSBiM2x5cCAvNi0z MWcoZCkgaG9tbyBhbmQgbHVtbyBsZXZlbCB3aGVyZSB0aGVyZSBpcyBhbG1vc3QgZXF1YWwgZGVu c2l0eSBvbiBib3RoIHRoZSBkb25vciBhbmQgYWNjZXB0b3IgcG9ydGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgbW9sZWN1 bGUuIEluIG90aGVyIHdvcmRzLCB0aGUgZWlnZW5zdGF0ZXMgYXJlIHZlcnkgZGVsb2NhbGl6ZWQu IFdoZW4gdXNpbmcgYSBmaW5pdGUgZmllbGQgbWV0aG9kIHdpdGggYSA2LTMxKytnIGJhc2lzIHRo ZSBob21vIGhhcyBtb3N0IG9mIHRoZSBkZW5zaXR5IG9uIHRoZSBkb25vciBhbmQgaW4gdGhlIGx1 bW8gaXRzIG1vc3RseSBvbiB0aGUgYWNjZXB0b3IsIHRoZSBlaWdlbnN0YXRlcyBhcmUgbW9yZSBs b2NhbGl6ZWQuDQoNCkhlcmUgaXMgbXkgcXVlc3Rpb246IGNvdWxkIHRoZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlv biBvZiB0aGUgZGlmZnVzZSBmdW5jdGlvbnMgY2F1c2UgdGhpcyBkaWZmZXJlbmNlPw0KDQpXb3Vs ZCBhIGZpbml0ZSBmaWVsZCBtZXRob2QgbGVhZCB0byBncmVhdGVyIGxvY2FsaXphdGlvbiBvZiB0 aGVzZSBlaWdlbnN0YXRlcz8NCg0KVGhlIGludGVycHJldGF0aW9uIG9mIG91ciBleHBlcmltZW50 YWwgZGF0YSB3aWxsIGRlcGVuZCBoZWF2aWx5IG9uIHRoZSBvdmVybGFwIG9mIHRoZSBlaWdlbnN0 YXRlcy4NCg0KVGhhbmtzIGluIGFkdmFuY2UuDQoNCioqKlNlbnQgdmlhIFJvYWRTeW5jwq4gZm9y IEFuZHJvaWTihKINCg== --_000_7573C7C772F1CB48A79EA49CDD41DD3DF39C2AB555EXMB01CMSsurr_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkm cXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90OyI+RGVhciBhbGwsPGJyPjxicj5JIGFtIGZhY2lu ZyBhIHByb2JsZW0gaW4gdGhlIG1vbGVjdWxhciBvcmJpdGFsIHJlcHJlc2VudGF0aW9uIG9mIHNv bWUgZGlwb2xhciBjaHJvbW9waG9yZXMgdXNpbmcgdHdvIGRpZmZlcmVudCBtZXRob2RzLiBJbiB0 aGUgZmlyc3QgY2FzZSB3ZSBoYXZlIGEgYjNseXAgLzYtMzFnKGQpIGhvbW8gYW5kIGx1bW8gbGV2 ZWwgd2hlcmUgdGhlcmUgaXMgYWxtb3N0IGVxdWFsIGRlbnNpdHkgb24gYm90aCB0aGUgZG9ub3Ig YW5kIGFjY2VwdG9yIHBvcnRpb24gb2YgdGhlIG1vbGVjdWxlLiBJbiBvdGhlciB3b3JkcywgdGhl IGVpZ2Vuc3RhdGVzIGFyZSB2ZXJ5IGRlbG9jYWxpemVkLiBXaGVuIHVzaW5nIGEgZmluaXRlIGZp ZWxkIG1ldGhvZCB3aXRoIGEgNi0zMSsrZyBiYXNpcyB0aGUgaG9tbyBoYXMgbW9zdCBvZiB0aGUg ZGVuc2l0eSBvbiB0aGUgZG9ub3IgYW5kIGluIHRoZSBsdW1vIGl0cyBtb3N0bHkgb24gdGhlIGFj Y2VwdG9yLCB0aGUgZWlnZW5zdGF0ZXMgYXJlIG1vcmUgbG9jYWxpemVkLiA8YnI+PGJyPkhlcmUg aXMgbXkgcXVlc3Rpb246IGNvdWxkIHRoZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgZGlmZnVzZSBm dW5jdGlvbnMgY2F1c2UgdGhpcyBkaWZmZXJlbmNlPzxicj48YnI+V291bGQgYSBmaW5pdGUgZmll bGQgbWV0aG9kIGxlYWQgdG8gZ3JlYXRlciBsb2NhbGl6YXRpb24gb2YgdGhlc2UgZWlnZW5zdGF0 ZXM/PGJyPjxicj5UaGUgaW50ZXJwcmV0YXRpb24gb2Ygb3VyIGV4cGVyaW1lbnRhbCBkYXRhIHdp bGwgZGVwZW5kIGhlYXZpbHkgb24gdGhlIG92ZXJsYXAgb2YgdGhlIGVpZ2Vuc3RhdGVzLjxicj48 YnI+VGhhbmtzIGluIGFkdmFuY2UuPGJyPjxicj4qKipTZW50IHZpYSBSb2FkU3luY8KuIGZvciBB bmRyb2lk4oSiPC9zcGFuPg0K --_000_7573C7C772F1CB48A79EA49CDD41DD3DF39C2AB555EXMB01CMSsurr_-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 11:02:00 2011 From: "Dillen, Jan jlmd(0)sun.ac.za JLMD(0)sun.ac.za" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Time consuming frequency calculations problem Message-Id: <-44374-110414031655-30796-syM2I3ZlDGcdGmdqzELiPQ() server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Dillen, Jan " Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:16:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Dillen, Jan [jlmd(_)sun.ac.za]" Eliz That depends on the level of theory that you are using, e.g. MP3 or QCISD require numerical derivatives, and also on the size of the basis set. 200+ atoms is demanding. To test if the rest of the input is OK, I would first run a HF/3-21G or something similar. Jan -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry+jlmd==sun.ac.za]~[ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry+jlmd==sun.ac.za]~[ccl.net] On Behalf Of Eliz Lam elizabeth.shlam~!~gmail.com Sent: 14 April 2011 07:19 To: Dillen, Jan Subject: CCL:G: Time consuming frequency calculations problem Sent to CCL by: "Eliz Lam" [elizabeth.shlam%a%gmail.com] Hi all, I've been trying with the frequency calculations with gaussian03 for a molecule with 207 atoms to verify whether the geometry obtained from optimisation is a minimum. However, it seems that the frequency calculations have not been completed even after three days. I wonder is there something wrong, since I haven't done a frequency calculations which requires so much time? Thanks! Elizhttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 11:37:00 2011 From: "Abrash, Sam sabrash(0)richmond.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Diffuse functions Message-Id: <-44375-110414113133-28194-Rb45Aoz+evXrKcr/2+DBLA^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Abrash, Sam" Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB1DF332AFC21544BA642BA6B7D4654D2E23AA3D8BUREXCHANGESCC_" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:31:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Abrash, Sam" [sabrash : richmond.edu] --_000_DB1DF332AFC21544BA642BA6B7D4654D2E23AA3D8BUREXCHANGESCC_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 V2hhdCBtZXRob2QgZGlkIHlvdSB1c2UgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIHRoZSBMVU1PPyAgSWYgeW91IG9u bHkgdXNlZCBhIGdyb3VuZCBzdGF0ZSBtZXRob2QgdG8gZGVzY3JpYmUgdGhlIHZpcnR1YWwgb3Ji aXRhbHMgKHRoZSBsb3dlc3QgZW5lcmd5IG9mIHdoaWNoIGlzIHRoZSBMVU1PKSwgdGhlbiB0aGUg TFVNTyBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBpcyBhbG1vc3QgY2VydGFpbmx5IGluY29ycmVjdC4gIFRyeSB1c2lu ZyBURERGVCByYXRoZXIgdGhhbiBhIGdyb3VuZCBzdGF0ZSBtZXRob2QuDQoNCkluIGFkZGl0aW9u IHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB3aGV0aGVyIHRoZSBkaWZmZXJlbmNlIGluIHlvdXIgcmVzdWx0cyBpcyBk dWUgdG8gdGhlIGZpbml0ZSBmaWVsZCBtZXRob2Qgb3IgdGhlIGJhc2lzIHNldCwgcmVydW4geW91 ciBERlQgcmVzdWx0cyB1c2luZyB0aGUgZGlmZnVzZSBiYXNpcyBzZXQgYW5kIGNvbXBhcmUgdGhl IHJlc3VsdHMuDQoNCkdvb2QgbHVjayENCg0KU2FtDQoNClNhbXVlbCBBLiBBYnJhc2gNCkRlcGFy dG1lbnQgb2YgQ2hlbWlzdHJ5DQpVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFJpY2htb25kDQpSaWNobW9uZCwgVkEg MjMxNzMNClBob25lOiAgODA0LTI4OS04MjQ4DQpGYXg6ICA4MDQtMjg3LTE4OTcNCkUtbWFpbDog IHNhYnJhc2hAcmljaG1vbmQuZWR1PG1haWx0bzpzYWJyYXNoQHJpY2htb25kLmVkdT4NCldlYi1w YWdlOiAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5yaWNobW9uZC5lZHUvfnNhYnJhc2g8aHR0cDovL29uY2FtcHVzLnJp Y2htb25kLmVkdS9+c2FicmFzaD4NCiJJbiAxODkzIENoYXJsZXMgSGludG9uIGxlZnQgSmFwYW4g dG8gYmVjb21lIGEgbWF0aGVtYXRpY3MgaW5zdHJ1Y3RvciBhdCBQcmluY2V0b24gVW5pdmVyc2l0 eSwgd2hlcmUgaGUgaW52ZW50ZWQgYSBiYXNlYmFsbC1waXRjaGluZyBtYWNoaW5lIHRoYXQgdXNl ZCBndW5wb3dkZXIgdG8gcHJvcGVsIHRoZSBiYWxscywgbGlrZSBhIGNhbm5vbi4gIEFmdGVyIHNl dmVyYWwgYWNjaWRlbnRzLCB0aGUgZGV2aWNlIHdhcyBhYmFuZG9uZWQgYW5kIEhpbnRvbiBsb3N0 IGhpcyBqb2IgLi4uIiBUZXJyeSBQcmF0Y2hldHQsIElhbiBTdGV3YXJkIGFuZCBKYWNrIENvaGVu LCBUaGUgU2NpZW5jZSBvZiBEaXNrd29ybGQgSUlJDQoNCkZyb206IG93bmVyLWNoZW1pc3RyeStz YWJyYXNoPT1yaWNobW9uZC5lZHVAY2NsLm5ldCBbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLWNoZW1pc3RyeStzYWJy YXNoPT1yaWNobW9uZC5lZHVAY2NsLm5ldF0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIFAuRC5KYXJvd3NraXs6fXN1 cnJleS5hYy51aw0KU2VudDogVGh1cnNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDE0LCAyMDExIDQ6NTMgQU0NClRvOiBB YnJhc2gsIFNhbQ0KU3ViamVjdDogQ0NMOiBEaWZmdXNlIGZ1bmN0aW9ucw0KDQpEZWFyIGFsbCwN Cg0KSSBhbSBmYWNpbmcgYSBwcm9ibGVtIGluIHRoZSBtb2xlY3VsYXIgb3JiaXRhbCByZXByZXNl bnRhdGlvbiBvZiBzb21lIGRpcG9sYXIgY2hyb21vcGhvcmVzIHVzaW5nIHR3byBkaWZmZXJlbnQg bWV0aG9kcy4gSW4gdGhlIGZpcnN0IGNhc2Ugd2UgaGF2ZSBhIGIzbHlwIC82LTMxZyhkKSBob21v IGFuZCBsdW1vIGxldmVsIHdoZXJlIHRoZXJlIGlzIGFsbW9zdCBlcXVhbCBkZW5zaXR5IG9uIGJv dGggdGhlIGRvbm9yIGFuZCBhY2NlcHRvciBwb3J0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBtb2xlY3VsZS4gSW4gb3Ro ZXIgd29yZHMsIHRoZSBlaWdlbnN0YXRlcyBhcmUgdmVyeSBkZWxvY2FsaXplZC4gV2hlbiB1c2lu ZyBhIGZpbml0ZSBmaWVsZCBtZXRob2Qgd2l0aCBhIDYtMzErK2cgYmFzaXMgdGhlIGhvbW8gaGFz IG1vc3Qgb2YgdGhlIGRlbnNpdHkgb24gdGhlIGRvbm9yIGFuZCBpbiB0aGUgbHVtbyBpdHMgbW9z dGx5IG9uIHRoZSBhY2NlcHRvciwgdGhlIGVpZ2Vuc3RhdGVzIGFyZSBtb3JlIGxvY2FsaXplZC4N Cg0KSGVyZSBpcyBteSBxdWVzdGlvbjogY291bGQgdGhlIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBk aWZmdXNlIGZ1bmN0aW9ucyBjYXVzZSB0aGlzIGRpZmZlcmVuY2U/DQoNCldvdWxkIGEgZmluaXRl IGZpZWxkIG1ldGhvZCBsZWFkIHRvIGdyZWF0ZXIgbG9jYWxpemF0aW9uIG9mIHRoZXNlIGVpZ2Vu c3RhdGVzPw0KDQpUaGUgaW50ZXJwcmV0YXRpb24gb2Ygb3VyIGV4cGVyaW1lbnRhbCBkYXRhIHdp bGwgZGVwZW5kIGhlYXZpbHkgb24gdGhlIG92ZXJsYXAgb2YgdGhlIGVpZ2Vuc3RhdGVzLg0KDQpU aGFua3MgaW4gYWR2YW5jZS4NCg0KKioqU2VudCB2aWEgUm9hZFN5bmPCriBmb3IgQW5kcm9pZOKE og0K --_000_DB1DF332AFC21544BA642BA6B7D4654D2E23AA3D8BUREXCHANGESCC_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6eD0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9z b2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6ZXhjZWwiIHhtbG5zOnA9InVybjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206 b2ZmaWNlOnBvd2VycG9pbnQiIHhtbG5zOmE9InVybjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2Zm aWNlOmFjY2VzcyIgeG1sbnM6ZHQ9InV1aWQ6QzJGNDEwMTAtNjVCMy0xMWQxLUEyOUYtMDBBQTAw QzE0ODgyIiB4bWxuczpzPSJ1dWlkOkJEQzZFM0YwLTZEQTMtMTFkMS1BMkEzLTAwQUEwMEMxNDg4 MiIgeG1sbnM6cnM9InVybjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206cm93c2V0IiB4bWxuczp6PSIj Um93c2V0U2NoZW1hIiB4bWxuczpiPSJ1cm46c2NoZW1hcy1taWNyb3NvZnQtY29tOm9mZmljZTpw dWJsaXNoZXIiIHhtbG5zOnNzPSJ1cm46c2NoZW1hcy1taWNyb3NvZnQtY29tOm9mZmljZTpzcHJl YWRzaGVldCIgeG1sbnM6Yz0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6Y29tcG9u ZW50OnNwcmVhZHNoZWV0IiB4bWxuczpvZGM9InVybjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2Zm aWNlOm9kYyIgeG1sbnM6b2E9InVybjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOmFjdGl2 YXRpb24iIHhtbG5zOmh0bWw9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnL1RSL1JFQy1odG1sNDAiIHhtbG5z OnE9Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLnhtbHNvYXAub3JnL3NvYXAvZW52ZWxvcGUvIiB4bWxuczpydGM9 Imh0dHA6Ly9taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL29mZmljZW5ldC9jb25mZXJlbmNpbmciIHhtbG5zOkQ9IkRB VjoiIHhtbG5zOlJlcGw9Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5jb20vcmVwbC8iIHhtbG5z Om10PSJodHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL3NoYXJlcG9pbnQvc29hcC9tZWV0aW5n cy8iIHhtbG5zOngyPSJodHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL29mZmljZS9leGNlbC8y MDAzL3htbCIgeG1sbnM6cHBkYT0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5wYXNzcG9ydC5jb20vTmFtZVNwYWNlLnhz ZCIgeG1sbnM6b2lzPSJodHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL3NoYXJlcG9pbnQvc29h cC9vaXMvIiB4bWxuczpkaXI9Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5jb20vc2hhcmVwb2lu dC9zb2FwL2RpcmVjdG9yeS8iIHhtbG5zOmRzPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnczLm9yZy8yMDAwLzA5L3ht bGRzaWcjIiB4bWxuczpkc3A9Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5jb20vc2hhcmVwb2lu dC9kc3AiIHhtbG5zOnVkYz0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9kYXRhL3VkYyIg eG1sbnM6eHNkPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnczLm9yZy8yMDAxL1hNTFNjaGVtYSIgeG1sbnM6c3ViPSJo dHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL3NoYXJlcG9pbnQvc29hcC8yMDAyLzEvYWxlcnRz LyIgeG1sbnM6ZWM9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDEvMDQveG1sZW5jIyIgeG1sbnM6c3A9 Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5jb20vc2hhcmVwb2ludC8iIHhtbG5zOnNwcz0iaHR0 cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9zaGFyZXBvaW50L3NvYXAvIiB4bWxuczp4c2k9Imh0 dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDEvWE1MU2NoZW1hLWluc3RhbmNlIiB4bWxuczp1ZGNzPSJodHRw Oi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL2RhdGEvdWRjL3NvYXAiIHhtbG5zOnVkY3hmPSJodHRw Oi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL2RhdGEvdWRjL3htbGZpbGUiIHhtbG5zOnVkY3AycD0i aHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9kYXRhL3VkYy9wYXJ0dG9wYXJ0IiB4bWxuczp3 Zj0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9zaGFyZXBvaW50L3NvYXAvd29ya2Zsb3cv IiB4bWxuczpkc3NzPSJodHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL29mZmljZS8yMDA2L2Rp Z3NpZy1zZXR1cCIgeG1sbnM6ZHNzaT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZp Y2UvMjAwNi9kaWdzaWciIHhtbG5zOm1kc3NpPSJodHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5vcGVueG1sZm9ybWF0 cy5vcmcvcGFja2FnZS8yMDA2L2RpZ2l0YWwtc2lnbmF0dXJlIiB4bWxuczptdmVyPSJodHRwOi8v c2NoZW1hcy5vcGVueG1sZm9ybWF0cy5vcmcvbWFya3VwLWNvbXBhdGliaWxpdHkvMjAwNiIgeG1s bnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4 bWxuczptcmVscz0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMub3BlbnhtbGZvcm1hdHMub3JnL3BhY2thZ2UvMjAw Ni9yZWxhdGlvbnNoaXBzIiB4bWxuczpzcHdwPSJodHRwOi8vbWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9zaGFyZXBv aW50L3dlYnBhcnRwYWdlcyIgeG1sbnM6ZXgxMnQ9Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5j b20vZXhjaGFuZ2Uvc2VydmljZXMvMjAwNi90eXBlcyIgeG1sbnM6ZXgxMm09Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hl bWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5jb20vZXhjaGFuZ2Uvc2VydmljZXMvMjAwNi9tZXNzYWdlcyIgeG1sbnM6 cHB0c2w9Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5jb20vc2hhcmVwb2ludC9zb2FwL1NsaWRl TGlicmFyeS8iIHhtbG5zOnNwc2w9Imh0dHA6Ly9taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL3dlYnNlcnZpY2VzL1No YXJlUG9pbnRQb3J0YWxTZXJ2ZXIvUHVibGlzaGVkTGlua3NTZXJ2aWNlIiB4bWxuczpaPSJ1cm46 c2NoZW1hcy1taWNyb3NvZnQtY29tOiIgeG1sbnM6c3Q9IiYjMTsiIHhtbG5zPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnczLm9yZy9UUi9SRUMtaHRtbDQwIj48aGVhZD48bWV0YSBodHRwLWVxdWl2PUNvbnRlbnQtVHlw ZSBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9dXRmLTgiPjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9R2VuZXJhdG9y IGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1pY3Jvc29mdCBXb3JkIDEyIChmaWx0ZXJlZCBtZWRpdW0pIj48c3R5bGU+PCEt LQ0KLyogRm9udCBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2Ft YnJpYSBNYXRoIjsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDQgNSAzIDUgNCA2IDMgMiA0O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UN Cgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUgMiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9 DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAz IDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQovKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1z b05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAw MDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4i LCJzZXJpZiI7fQ0KYTpsaW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3Jp dHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlz aXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7 DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFp bFN0eWxlMTcNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiIsInNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCWZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5v cm1hbDsNCglmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246bm9uZSBub25lO30N Ci5Nc29DaHBEZWZhdWx0DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5O30NCkBwYWdlIFdv cmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWluIDExLjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW46MS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4w aW4gMS4waW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48 L3N0eWxlPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0i ZWRpdCIgc3BpZG1heD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1z byA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9 ImVkaXQiIGRhdGE9IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+PC9o ZWFkPjxib2R5IGxhbmc9RU4tVVMgbGluaz1ibHVlIHZsaW5rPXB1cnBsZT48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVdv cmRTZWN0aW9uMT48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9J2NvbG9yOmJsdWUnPldo YXQgbWV0aG9kIGRpZCB5b3UgdXNlIHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB0aGUgTFVNTz/CoCBJZiB5b3Ugb25s eSB1c2VkIGEgZ3JvdW5kIHN0YXRlIG1ldGhvZCB0byBkZXNjcmliZSB0aGUgdmlydHVhbCBvcmJp dGFscyAodGhlIGxvd2VzdCBlbmVyZ3kgb2Ygd2hpY2ggaXMgdGhlIExVTU8pLCB0aGVuIHRoZSBM VU1PIGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIGlzIGFsbW9zdCBjZXJ0YWlubHkgaW5jb3JyZWN0LsKgIFRyeSB1c2lu ZyBURERGVCByYXRoZXIgdGhhbiBhIGdyb3VuZCBzdGF0ZSBtZXRob2QuPG86cD48L286cD48L3Nw YW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+PG86cD4m bmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29s b3I6Ymx1ZSc+SW4gYWRkaXRpb24gdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIHdoZXRoZXIgdGhlIGRpZmZlcmVuY2Ug aW4geW91ciByZXN1bHRzIGlzIGR1ZSB0byB0aGUgZmluaXRlIGZpZWxkIG1ldGhvZCBvciB0aGUg YmFzaXMgc2V0LCByZXJ1biB5b3VyIERGVCByZXN1bHRzIHVzaW5nIHRoZSBkaWZmdXNlIGJhc2lz IHNldCBhbmQgY29tcGFyZSB0aGUgcmVzdWx0cy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xh c3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSdjb2xvcjpibHVlJz48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwv c3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSdjb2xvcjpibHVlJz5Hb29k IGx1Y2shPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBzdHls ZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05v cm1hbD48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+U2FtPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxw IGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286 cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+ U2FtdWVsIEEuIEFicmFzaDxicj5EZXBhcnRtZW50IG9mIENoZW1pc3RyeTxicj5Vbml2ZXJzaXR5 IG9mIFJpY2htb25kPGJyPlJpY2htb25kLCBWQSAyMzE3Mzxicj5QaG9uZTrCoCA4MDQtMjg5LTgy NDg8YnI+RmF4OsKgIDgwNC0yODctMTg5Nzxicj5FLW1haWw6wqAgPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnNh YnJhc2hAcmljaG1vbmQuZWR1Ij48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+c2FicmFzaEByaWNo bW9uZC5lZHU8L3NwYW4+PC9hPjxicj5XZWItcGFnZTrCoCA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vb25jYW1w dXMucmljaG1vbmQuZWR1L35zYWJyYXNoIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+aHR0cDov L3d3dy5yaWNobW9uZC5lZHUvfnNhYnJhc2g8L3NwYW4+PC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwv cD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjtjb2xvcjpibHVlJz4mcXVvdDtJbiAxODkzJm5i c3A7Q2hhcmxlcyBIaW50b24mbmJzcDtsZWZ0IEphcGFuIHRvIGJlY29tZSBhIG1hdGhlbWF0aWNz IGluc3RydWN0b3IgYXQgUHJpbmNldG9uIFVuaXZlcnNpdHksIHdoZXJlIGhlIGludmVudGVkIGEm bmJzcDtiYXNlYmFsbC1waXRjaGluZyBtYWNoaW5lIHRoYXQgdXNlZCBndW5wb3dkZXIgdG8gcHJv cGVsIHRoZSBiYWxscywgbGlrZSBhIGNhbm5vbi4mbmJzcDsgQWZ0ZXIgc2V2ZXJhbCBhY2NpZGVu dHMsIHRoZSBkZXZpY2Ugd2FzIGFiYW5kb25lZCBhbmQgSGludG9uIGxvc3QgaGlzIGpvYiAuLi4m cXVvdDsgVGVycnkgUHJhdGNoZXR0LCBJYW4gU3Rld2FyZCBhbmQmbmJzcDtKYWNrIENvaGVuLCBU aGUgU2NpZW5jZSBvZiBEaXNrd29ybGQgSUlJPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNz PU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6Ymx1ZSc+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3Nw YW4+PC9wPjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9J2JvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci10b3A6c29saWQgI0I1QzRERiAx LjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjMuMHB0IDBpbiAwaW4gMGluJz48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+PGI+PHNw YW4gc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IlRhaG9tYSIsInNhbnMtc2Vy aWYiJz5Gcm9tOjwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6IlRhaG9tYSIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYiJz4gb3duZXItY2hlbWlzdHJ5K3NhYnJhc2g9PXJp Y2htb25kLmVkdUBjY2wubmV0IFttYWlsdG86b3duZXItY2hlbWlzdHJ5K3NhYnJhc2g9PXJpY2ht b25kLmVkdUBjY2wubmV0XSA8Yj5PbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgPC9iPlAuRC5KYXJvd3NraXs6fXN1cnJl eS5hYy51azxicj48Yj5TZW50OjwvYj4gVGh1cnNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDE0LCAyMDExIDQ6NTMgQU08 YnI+PGI+VG86PC9iPiBBYnJhc2gsIFNhbTxicj48Yj5TdWJqZWN0OjwvYj4gQ0NMOiBEaWZmdXNl IGZ1bmN0aW9uczxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48L2Rpdj48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+ PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSdmb250 LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiInPkRlYXIgYWxs LDxicj48YnI+SSBhbSBmYWNpbmcgYSBwcm9ibGVtIGluIHRoZSBtb2xlY3VsYXIgb3JiaXRhbCBy ZXByZXNlbnRhdGlvbiBvZiBzb21lIGRpcG9sYXIgY2hyb21vcGhvcmVzIHVzaW5nIHR3byBkaWZm ZXJlbnQgbWV0aG9kcy4gSW4gdGhlIGZpcnN0IGNhc2Ugd2UgaGF2ZSBhIGIzbHlwIC82LTMxZyhk KSBob21vIGFuZCBsdW1vIGxldmVsIHdoZXJlIHRoZXJlIGlzIGFsbW9zdCBlcXVhbCBkZW5zaXR5 IG9uIGJvdGggdGhlIGRvbm9yIGFuZCBhY2NlcHRvciBwb3J0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBtb2xlY3VsZS4g SW4gb3RoZXIgd29yZHMsIHRoZSBlaWdlbnN0YXRlcyBhcmUgdmVyeSBkZWxvY2FsaXplZC4gV2hl biB1c2luZyBhIGZpbml0ZSBmaWVsZCBtZXRob2Qgd2l0aCBhIDYtMzErK2cgYmFzaXMgdGhlIGhv bW8gaGFzIG1vc3Qgb2YgdGhlIGRlbnNpdHkgb24gdGhlIGRvbm9yIGFuZCBpbiB0aGUgbHVtbyBp dHMgbW9zdGx5IG9uIHRoZSBhY2NlcHRvciwgdGhlIGVpZ2Vuc3RhdGVzIGFyZSBtb3JlIGxvY2Fs aXplZC4gPGJyPjxicj5IZXJlIGlzIG15IHF1ZXN0aW9uOiBjb3VsZCB0aGUgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRp b24gb2YgdGhlIGRpZmZ1c2UgZnVuY3Rpb25zIGNhdXNlIHRoaXMgZGlmZmVyZW5jZT88YnI+PGJy PldvdWxkIGEgZmluaXRlIGZpZWxkIG1ldGhvZCBsZWFkIHRvIGdyZWF0ZXIgbG9jYWxpemF0aW9u IG9mIHRoZXNlIGVpZ2Vuc3RhdGVzPzxicj48YnI+VGhlIGludGVycHJldGF0aW9uIG9mIG91ciBl eHBlcmltZW50YWwgZGF0YSB3aWxsIGRlcGVuZCBoZWF2aWx5IG9uIHRoZSBvdmVybGFwIG9mIHRo ZSBlaWdlbnN0YXRlcy48YnI+PGJyPlRoYW5rcyBpbiBhZHZhbmNlLjxicj48YnI+KioqU2VudCB2 aWEgUm9hZFN5bmPCriBmb3IgQW5kcm9pZOKEojwvc3Bhbj4gPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+PC9kaXY+ PC9ib2R5PjwvaHRtbD4= --_000_DB1DF332AFC21544BA642BA6B7D4654D2E23AA3D8BUREXCHANGESCC_-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 12:32:01 2011 From: "P.D.Jarowski.\a/.surrey.ac.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Diffuse functions Message-Id: <-44376-110414123007-13116-I0wan5JuQk9EydnR84yNPA\a/server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Content-Language: en Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9CCDF8E1551pj0013surreyacuk_" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:29:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: [P.D.Jarowski]^[surrey.ac.uk] --_000_C9CCDF8E1551pj0013surreyacuk_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, thanks. Yes I tried that and the orbitals on the donor side got a littl= e bigger. I guess I was looking for a general conclusion about diffuse func= tions. In my experience, the general conclusions and shape of orbitals is r= ather basis set independent and I was hoping for someone to confirm that fo= r me. Do you know if this is indeed true? Hard to find such things in the literature. If anyone has a reference that = would be great. Best Regards, Peter On 4/14/11 3:31 PM, "Abrash, Sam sabrash(0)richmond.edu" wrote: What method did you use to determine the LUMO? If you only used a ground s= tate method to describe the virtual orbitals (the lowest energy of which is= the LUMO), then the LUMO description is almost certainly incorrect. Try u= sing TDDFT rather than a ground state method. In addition to determine whether the difference in your results is due to t= he finite field method or the basis set, rerun your DFT results using the d= iffuse basis set and compare the results. Good luck! Sam Samuel A. Abrash Department of Chemistry University of Richmond Richmond, VA 23173 Phone: 804-289-8248 Fax: 804-287-1897 E-mail: sabrash^-^richmond.edu Web-page: http://www.richmond.edu/~sabrash "In 1893 Charles Hinton left Japan to become a mathematics instructor at Pr= inceton University, where he invented a baseball-pitching machine that used= gunpowder to propel the balls, like a cannon. After several accidents, th= e device was abandoned and Hinton lost his job ..." Terry Pratchett, Ian St= eward and Jack Cohen, The Science of Diskworld III > From: owner-chemistry+sabrash=3D=3Drichmond.edu^-^ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemi= stry+sabrash=3D=3Drichmond.edu^-^ccl.net] On Behalf Of P.D.Jarowski{:}surrey.= ac.uk Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:53 AM To: Abrash, Sam Subject: CCL: Diffuse functions Dear all, I am facing a problem in the molecular orbital representation of some dipol= ar chromophores using two different methods. In the first case we have a b3= lyp /6-31g(d) homo and lumo level where there is almost equal density on bo= th the donor and acceptor portion of the molecule. In other words, the eige= nstates are very delocalized. When using a finite field method with a 6-31+= +g basis the homo has most of the density on the donor and in the lumo its = mostly on the acceptor, the eigenstates are more localized. Here is my question: could the implementation of the diffuse functions caus= e this difference? Would a finite field method lead to greater localization of these eigenstat= es? The interpretation of our experimental data will depend heavily on the over= lap of the eigenstates. Thanks in advance. ***Sent via RoadSync=AE for Android(tm) --_000_C9CCDF8E1551pj0013surreyacuk_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: CCL: Diffuse functions Hi, thanks. Yes I tried that and the orbitals on the donor side got a= little bigger. I guess I was looking for a general conclusion about diffus= e functions. In my experience, the general conclusions and shape of orbital= s is rather basis set independent and I was hoping for someone to confirm t= hat for me. Do you know if this is indeed true?

Hard to find such things in the literature. If anyone has a reference that = would be great.

Best Regards,

Peter


On 4/14/11 3:31 PM, "Abrash, Sam sabrash(0)richmond.edu" <owner-chemistry^-^ccl.net> wrote:

What method did you use to determine t= he LUMO?=A0 If you only used a ground state method to describe the virtual = orbitals (the lowest energy of which is the LUMO), then the LUMO descriptio= n is almost certainly incorrect.=A0 Try using TDDFT rather than a ground st= ate method.
 
In addition to determine whether the difference in your results is due to t= he finite field method or the basis set, rerun your DFT results using the d= iffuse basis set and compare the results.
 
Good luck!
 
Sam
 
Samuel A. Abrash
Department of Chemistry
University of Richmond
Richmond, VA 23173
Phone:=A0 804-289-8248
Fax:=A0 804-287-1897
E-mail:=A0 sabrash^-^richmond.edu <mailto:sabrash^-^richmond.edu> <= BR> Web-page:=A0 http://www.richmo= nd.edu/~sabrash <h= ttp://oncampus.richmond.edu/~sabrash>
"In 1893 Charles Hinton left Japan to become a mat= hematics instructor at Princeton University, where he invented a baseball-p= itching machine that used gunpowder to propel the balls, like a cannon. &nb= sp;After several accidents, the device was abandoned and Hinton lost his jo= b ..." Terry Pratchett, Ian Steward and Jack Cohen, The Science of Dis= kworld III


From: owner-chemistry+sabrash=3D=3Drichmond.e= du^-^ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry+sabrash=3D=3Drichmond.edu^-^ccl.net] = On Behalf Of P.D.Jarowski{:}surrey.ac.uk
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:53 AM
To: Abrash, Sam
Subject: CCL: Diffuse functions

Dear all,

I am facing a problem in the molecular orbital representation of some dipol= ar chromophores using two different methods. In the first case we have a b3= lyp /6-31g(d) homo and lumo level where there is almost equal density on bo= th the donor and acceptor portion of the molecule. In other words, the eige= nstates are very delocalized. When using a finite field method with a 6-31+= +g basis the homo has most of the density on the donor and in the lumo its = mostly on the acceptor, the eigenstates are more localized.

Here is my question: could the implementation of the diffuse functions caus= e this difference?

Would a finite field method lead to greater localization of these eigenstat= es?

The interpretation of our experimental data will depend heavily on the over= lap of the eigenstates.

Thanks in advance.

***Sent via RoadSync® for Android™


--_000_C9CCDF8E1551pj0013surreyacuk_-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 17:59:00 2011 From: "=?GB2312?B?0vO9oQ==?= janeyin600(a)gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: ADMP trajectories in Gaussian Message-Id: <-44377-110414175719-1679-U/Mob69gdrvbolzzLoZ3vQ(0)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: =?GB2312?B?0vO9oQ==?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301d4242efc5b304a0e801ac Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:57:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: =?GB2312?B?0vO9oQ==?= [janeyin600,,gmail.com] --20cf301d4242efc5b304a0e801ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello there, I wonder if anyone has done the *ADMP* trajectories in Gaussian before? I'd like to know if I can calculate multiple trajectories in the same log file and show them at the same time in Gaussview. Another questions is: If I start from the same transition state and run for several times, would they be different due to some random factor?? Thank you very much!!! Jane --20cf301d4242efc5b304a0e801ac Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello there,
=A0
I wonder if anyone has done the ADMP trajectories in = Gaussian before? I'd like to know if I can calculate multiple trajector= ies in the same log file and=A0show them at the same time in Gaussview.
=A0
Another questions is: If I start from the same transition state and=A0= run=A0for several times, would they be different due to some random factor?= ?
=A0
Thank you very much!!!
=A0
Jane
--20cf301d4242efc5b304a0e801ac-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Apr 14 21:24:00 2011 From: "Cory Pye cpye%x%ap.smu.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Polarized IR spectra Question Message-Id: <-44378-110414125439-1608-tU4U4YUR734TGvaTKHH6Ng-*-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Cory Pye Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:54:24 -0300 (ADT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Cory Pye [cpye|*|ap.smu.ca] On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Timothy Coleman tctcole6[A]gmail.com wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Timothy Coleman" [tctcole6() gmail.com] > Dear CCL Subscribers, > > I would like to kindly ask you about simulating polarized IR spectra. Could anybody tell me how to use the informations delivered by Gaussian frequency outputs in order to predict the spectra in that form? Please forgive me this very naive question, but I am new in this matter and I wonder how to use the depolarization ratios. I suppose that it is trivial. I would really appreciate your help! > Dear Tim, I am not aware of polarized IR spectra. I think you mean polarized Raman spectrum. Basically the total Raman spectra (which should have the same frequencies as an IR spectrum but different intensity patterns) can be regarded as the sum of two contributions, the polarized and depolarized contributions, measured experimentally, which can be separated into the isotropic and anisotropic contributions. The newer versions of Gaussian reports depolarization rations for both laser sources and older sources, in the lines Depolar (P) and Depolar (U). Depolarized modes have a depolarization ratio of 3/4 with a laser source and 6/7 with the older mercury arc lamp sources. The total intensity would be the Raman activity (Raman activ). If R is the Raman activity and p is the depolarization ratio, then the isotropic spectra can be constructed as Iiso = R*(1-4/3*p) and the anisotropic spectra as Ianiso = R*(4/3)*p . I think any good phys chem or molecular spec text should have the formulas in them. ************* ! Dr. Cory C. Pye ***************** ! Associate Professor *** ** ** ** ! Theoretical and Computational Chemistry ** * **** ! Department of Chemistry, Saint Mary's University ** * * ! 923 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3 ** * * ! cpye^_^crux.stmarys.ca http://apwww.stmarys.ca/~cpye *** * * ** ! Ph: (902)-420-5654 FAX:(902)-496-8104 ***************** ! ************* ! Les Hartree-Focks (Apologies to Montreal Canadien Fans)