From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat May 9 05:41:00 2009 From: "vadicherla tati reddy tatireddy.vadicherla]=[gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: docking Message-Id: <-39260-090508151606-13538-hrfNMfZCsEKmIOksq6l77w-$-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: vadicherla tati reddy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636af034216aeb304696b75a3 Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:45:53 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: vadicherla tati reddy [tatireddy.vadicherla*gmail.com] --001636af034216aeb304696b75a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hii, For Docking i suggest you to opt for GLIDE ( from SCHRODINGER) On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Danni Harris danni]![simbiosys.ca < owner-chemistry+/-ccl.net> wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Danni Harris" [danni(!)simbiosys.ca] > All the packages mentioned in this thread to date are first rate---and I > have used most of them to good effect. > > Each of these are worth examining in trials ---and if you can afford it > having more than 1-package is a good idea. Each has their strengths. > > You also want to go read a few reviews on scoring functions---there have > been numerous over the past few years---I'll just mention the latest one > I've seen: > > Cheng, T. Yan X-L., Liu Z., Wang R. "Comparative Assessment of Scoring > Functions on a Diverse Test Set." JCIM 49:1079-1093 (2009). > > You may also want to download and try eHiTS. It is available for 1-month > demo's---and low cost. > > Two of the aspects I see as strengths for this own package in my own > personal research is a knowledge based scoring function that often gives > low-RMSD/score correlations/separations--such that your top-ranked poses > tend to be the ones observed in structural biology. I would like to have > some assurance when examining docking paradigms that my Top-Rank poses are > the relevant ones. > > One can also 'family' train your own customized scoring function to > improve this latter facet (if need be) for particular pharmacological > families. > > Here's some blog items to say a few words about these concepts. > > http://www.simbiosys.ca/blog/2009/05/04/fragment-based-pose-prediction-and-affinity-scoring/ > > http://www.simbiosys.ca/blog/2009/03/10/fragment-pose-prediction-and-score-rmsd-correlations/ > > One last facet---besides running on Intel platforms---you can also set up > a PS3 'farm' for low cost supercomputing performance. I am currently doing > this myself for high throughput metabolism predictions. So for $400.00 I > have a platform that will replace 8-30 nodes on a cluster---and running > the PS3's in parallel gives nearly linear scaling. > > Danni > > > > > > Sent to CCL by: "neeraj misra" [neerajmisra[-]hotmail.com] > > PLEASE SUGGEST SOME GOOD PACKAGE FOR DOCKING STUDIES AND MD SIMULATION.> > > > > > -- > Danni Harris, Ph.D. > Scientific Sales and Support Executive > Computational Chemistry Software Development > SimBioSys > 135 Queens Plate Dr.; Unit 520 > Toronto, Ontario > M9W V61, Canada > Tel. Head-Office: 416-741-4263 > Mobile: 650-799-6637 > Fax: 416-741-5084 > Web: http://www.simbiosys.ca> > > --001636af034216aeb304696b75a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hii,
For Docking=A0 i suggest you to opt for GLIDE=A0=A0( from SCHRODINGER)=

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Danni Harris da= nni]![simbiosys.ca &l= t;owner-chemistry+/-ccl.net>= ; wrote:

Sent to CCL by: "Danni = Harris" [danni(!)si= mbiosys.ca]
All the packages mentioned in this thread to date are first rate---and Ihave used most of them to good effect.

Each of these are worth exam= ining in trials ---and if you can afford it
having more than 1-package i= s a good idea. Each has their strengths.

You also want to go read a few reviews on scoring functions---there hav= e
been numerous over the past few years---I'll just mention the late= st one
I've seen:

Cheng, T. Yan X-L., Liu Z., Wang R. =A0&quo= t;Comparative Assessment of Scoring
Functions on a Diverse Test Set." JCIM 49:1079-1093 (2009).

You= may also want to download and try eHiTS. It is available for 1-month
de= mo's---and low cost.

Two of the aspects I see as strengths for t= his own package in my own
personal research is a knowledge based scoring function that often giveslow-RMSD/score correlations/separations--such that your top-ranked posestend to be the ones observed in structural biology. I would like to have<= br> some assurance when examining docking paradigms that my Top-Rank poses are<= br>the relevant ones.

One can also 'family' train your own c= ustomized scoring function to
improve this latter facet (if need be) for= particular pharmacological
families.

Here's some blog items to say a few words about these = concepts.
http://www.sim= biosys.ca/blog/2009/05/04/fragment-based-pose-prediction-and-affinity-scori= ng/
http://www.simbiosys.ca/bl= og/2009/03/10/fragment-pose-prediction-and-score-rmsd-correlations/

One last facet---besides running on Intel platforms---you can also set = up
a PS3 'farm' for low cost supercomputing performance. I am cu= rrently doing
this myself for high throughput metabolism predictions. So= for $400.00 =A0I
have a platform that will replace 8-30 nodes on a cluster---and running
= the PS3's in parallel gives nearly linear scaling.

Danni

=
>
> Sent to CCL by: "neeraj =A0misra" [neerajmisra[-= ]hotmail.com]
> PLEASE SUGGEST SOME GOOD PACKAGE FOR DOCKING STUDIES AND MD SIMULATION= .>
>


--
Danni Harris, Ph.D.
Scientific Sales and = Support Executive
Computational Chemistry Software Development
SimBio= Sys
135 Queens Plate Dr.; Unit 520
Toronto, Ontario
M9W V61, Canada
Te= l. Head-Office: 416-741-4263
Mobile: 650-799-6637
Fax: 416-741-5084Web: http://www.si= mbiosys.ca



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing= script =3D-
To recover the email address of the author of the message, = please change
the strange characters on the top line to the +/- sign. You = can also
E-mail to subs= cribers: CHEMISTRY+/-ccl.net or use:=
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: = CHEMISTRY-REQUEST+/-ccl.net or use
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/cg= i-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_u= nsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.c= cl.net/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemist= ry/announcements/conferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.sht= ml
=A0= =A0 =A0http:= //www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/


--001636af034216aeb304696b75a3-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat May 9 08:07:00 2009 From: "=?gb2312?B?yqnBvA==?= shiliang%a%mail.ustc.edu.cn" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Problems with CASSCF Message-Id: <-39261-090509075116-8615-lpRQCuaQAG0QhC413CUmYA|,|server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "=?gb2312?B?yqnBvA==?=" Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 19:52:00 +0800 Sent to CCL by: "=?gb2312?B?yqnBvA==?=" [shiliang[A]mail.ustc.edu.cn] Dear CCLers£¬ I'm doing a CASSCF calculation and I need some suggestion or tips to get appropriate active space. BTW,in my Gaussian output files, there are all "(A)" ,not "(A'')" or "(A')") at "Orbital Symmetries" part(on a Guess=Only job), especially a small molecule "acrolein", therefore, I'm in a puzzle as to how to ensure the active space. Thanks in advance. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat May 9 11:37:01 2009 From: "tang_shi_ya tang_shi_ya!=!126.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Problem with CASSCF Message-Id: <-39262-090508102600-21711-A0iLeKsJZzubnwvWgbhxXg^_^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "tang_shi_ya" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon706804700230_=====" Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 21:54:21 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "tang_shi_ya" [tang_shi_ya+/-126.com] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=====003_Dragon706804700230_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear CCLers, I'm doing a CASSCF calculation and I need some suggestion or tips to get appropriate active space. BTW,in my Gaussian output files, there are all "(A)" ,not "(A'')" or "(A')") at "Orbital Symmetries" part(on a Guess=Only job), especially a small molecule "acrolein", therefore, I'm in a puzzle as to how to ensure the active space. Thanks in advance. tang_shi_ya 2009-05-08 --=====003_Dragon706804700230_===== Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dear CCLers,
   I'm doing a CASSCF calculation and I need some suggestion or tips to get appropriate active space.
 
BTW,in my Gaussian output files, there are all "(A)" ,not "(A'')" or "(A')") at "Orbital Symmetries" part(on a Guess=Only job), especially a small molecule "acrolein", therefore, I'm in a puzzle as to how to ensure the active space.
 
Thanks in advance.

tang_shi_ya
2009-05-08
--=====003_Dragon706804700230_=====-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat May 9 17:31:00 2009 From: "Carsten Detering detering#biosolveit.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL: free docking Message-Id: <-39263-090509052727-24716-nq+HtoafNJs8COnwPoHZuA(!)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Carsten Detering" Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:27:23 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Carsten Detering" [detering|-|biosolveit.de] Dear Jacopo FlexX has a very intuitive graphical user interface, guiding the user through the entire process of setting up a docking job. Check it out here: www.biosolveit.com/flexx There is a very attractive package for academic users. If you want to know more about it, please contact us: contact#,#biosolveit.com Cheers Carsten From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat May 9 18:05:00 2009 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gon=E7alo_C=2E_Justino?= jgcj[*]fct.unl.pt" To: CCL Subject: CCL: docking Message-Id: <-39264-090508142514-10148-XunOmlIblBAHoklGfeC3+g::server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gon=E7alo_C=2E_Justino?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a9b1beacee04696aa6bc Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 19:18:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gon=E7alo_C=2E_Justino?= [jgcj===fct.unl.pt] --001636c5a9b1beacee04696aa6bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > One last facet---besides running on Intel platforms---you can also set up > a PS3 'farm' for low cost supercomputing performance. I am currently doin= g > this myself for high throughput metabolism predictions. So for $400.00 I > have a platform that will replace 8-30 nodes on a cluster---and running > the PS3's in parallel gives nearly linear scaling. > > Sorry, I'm... perplex... PS3 as in Playstation 3?! Really?! One PS3 =3D 8 - 30 nodes? Where's the how-to? Gon=E7alo --001636c5a9b1beacee04696aa6bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

One last facet---besides running on Intel platforms---you can also set up a PS3 'farm' for low cost supercomputing performance. I am currentl= y doing
this myself for high throughput metabolism predictions. So for $400.00 =A0I=
have a platform that will replace 8-30 nodes on a cluster---and running
the PS3's in parallel gives nearly linear scaling.

Sorry, I'm... perplex...

PS3 as in Playstation= 3?! Really?!

One PS3 =3D 8 - 30 nodes?

Where's the how-t= o?

Gon=E7alo
--001636c5a9b1beacee04696aa6bc-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat May 9 22:44:00 2009 From: "Sulayman Oladepo soladepo[-]ualberta.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Question on gar2ped for PED calculations Message-Id: <-39265-090509222336-22216-XvwQ2mQAD8Mtcp9Dhe9uww_-_server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Sulayman Oladepo" Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 22:23:32 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Sulayman Oladepo" [soladepo[*]ualberta.ca] Hi, I am mailing to ask a question about the gar2ped program. I got information from that this program could be downloaded from the CCL website. I have downloaded the program, but for some reasons it doesn't work. I know some former members of my reserach group had successfully used it for PED calculations in the past. But for quite some time now, even those who had used it in the past cann't get it to work. I just tried downloading the program again, using a munual written by a former group member as a guide. But it still didn't work. I'm wondering there must be something missing to get it to work. Can you please offer some suggestions about how to get this program to work? Any suggestions about other programs that can do similar calculations as gar2ped will be appreciated. Basically, i need a program that can give internal coordinates as well as as potential energy distribution (PED) information just like gar2ped. Thank you. Sulayman Oladepo soladepo[#]ualberta.ca