From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Jan 15 04:06:01 2009 From: "Roland H Lindh roland.lindh*_*teokem.lu.se" To: CCL Subject: CCL: CASPT2 transition metal complex excitation energies Message-Id: <-38430-090115035408-18565-TNwH5DBcrmT+xZQwPCkzlw .. server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Roland H Lindh" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:54:04 -0500 Sent to CCL by: "Roland H Lindh" [roland.lindh||teokem.lu.se] Dear CCL Subscribers, I'm calling on you for help. We are currently benchmarking the CASPT2 method for excitation energies. For that purpose we need, in addition to a set of organic molecules, which we already have, also some transition metal complex. If you have any old MOLCAS input decks around from CASPT2 calculations we would be very glad to recycle these. In return we will cite your work whenever we us the test suite in the future. If this is possible we would like to have: 1. the MOLCAS input deck (the CASSCF and CASPT2 calculations should be in a single input deck, 2. any associated MO vector files, 3. reference values of the excitation energies, 4. the version of MOLCAS which was used in your case and 5. the reference that you would like us to cite. Thanks for your help and contribution! Roland Lindh roland.lindh---teokem.lu.se From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Jan 15 09:13:01 2009 From: "Francesca Mocci francimocci .. tiscali.it" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: G03, problem with PCM : ALPHA scaling factor with UAKS not read correctly Message-Id: <-38431-090114191355-9383-vHw37uiVNlpHiuGnaViDIA[a]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Francesca Mocci Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010106050601080904050104" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:35:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Francesca Mocci [francimocci-#-tiscali.it] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010106050601080904050104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I'm using g03 revision C02 to optimize the structure of a molecule modeling the solvent through PCM defining the molecular cavity through the UAKS model and using an electrostatic scaling factor for the sphere radius of 1.4 This is the input: > %chk=uaks_1.4_ch3cn_6311gdp.chk > # pbe1pbe/6-311g(d,p) opt SCRF=(PCM,Read,Solvent=acetonitrile) > # freq > > 14gen09 > > 0 1 > coordinates of the system > > TABS=298. > RADII=UAKS > ALPHA=1.4 But the program seems not to read correctly the ALPHA input, infact in the output file it writes: > Using the following non-standard input for PCM: > TABS=298. > RADII=UAKS > ALPHA=1.4 > --- end of non-standard input. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > United Atom Topological Model (UAKS parameters set). > Nord Group Hybr Charge Alpha Radius Bonded to > 1 C sp2 0.00 1.20 1.680 O2 [s] O7 [d] C8 [s] > 2 O sp3 0.00 1.20 1.500 C1 [s] C3 [s] > 3 CH3 sp3 0.00 1.20 1.950 O2 [s] > 7 O sp2 0.00 1.20 1.500 C1 [d] > 8 CH3 sp3 0.00 1.20 1.950 C1 [s] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ If the cavity is defined with the UA0 model the ALPHA value is read correctly: > Using the following non-standard input for PCM: > TABS=298. > ALPHA=1.4 > --- end of non-standard input. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > United Atom Topological Model (UA0 parameters set). > Nord Group Hybr Charge Alpha Radius Bonded to > 1 C * 0.00 1.40 1.925 O2 [s] O7 [d] C8 [s] > 2 O * 0.00 1.40 1.750 C1 [s] C3 [s] > 3 CH3 * 0.00 1.40 2.525 O2 [s] > 7 O * 0.00 1.40 1.750 C1 [d] > 8 CH3 * 0.00 1.40 2.525 C1 [s] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is this a bug or am I missing something? Any hint on how to solve this problem would be very welcome! Best Regards, Francesca Mocci --------------010106050601080904050104 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all,

I'm using g03 revision C02 to  optimize the structure of a molecule modeling the solvent through PCM
defining the molecular cavity through the UAKS model
and using an electrostatic scaling factor for the sphere radius of 1.4

This is the input:
%chk=uaks_1.4_ch3cn_6311gdp.chk
# pbe1pbe/6-311g(d,p) opt  SCRF=(PCM,Read,Solvent=acetonitrile)
# freq

14gen09

0 1
coordinates of the system

TABS=298.
RADII=UAKS
ALPHA=1.4


But the program seems not to read correctly the ALPHA input, infact in the output file
it writes:

Using the following non-standard input for PCM:
 TABS=298.
 RADII=UAKS
 ALPHA=1.4
 --- end of non-standard input.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 United Atom Topological Model (UAKS parameters set).
  Nord Group  Hybr  Charge Alpha Radius          Bonded to
    1   C     sp2   0.00   1.20  1.680   O2   [s]  O7   [d]  C8   [s]
    2   O     sp3   0.00   1.20  1.500   C1   [s]  C3   [s]
    3   CH3   sp3   0.00   1.20  1.950   O2   [s]
    7   O     sp2   0.00   1.20  1.500   C1   [d]
    8   CH3   sp3   0.00   1.20  1.950   C1   [s]

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the cavity is defined with the UA0 model the ALPHA value is read correctly:

 Using the following non-standard input for PCM:
 TABS=298.
 ALPHA=1.4
 --- end of non-standard input.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 United Atom Topological Model (UA0  parameters set).
  Nord Group  Hybr  Charge Alpha Radius          Bonded to
    1   C     *     0.00   1.40  1.925   O2   [s]  O7   [d]  C8   [s]
    2   O     *     0.00   1.40  1.750   C1   [s]  C3   [s]
    3   CH3   *     0.00   1.40  2.525   O2   [s]
    7   O     *     0.00   1.40  1.750   C1   [d]
    8   CH3   *     0.00   1.40  2.525   C1   [s]
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a bug or am 
I missing something?
Any hint on how to solve this problem would be very welcome!

Best Regards,
Francesca Mocci





  
--------------010106050601080904050104-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Jan 15 12:28:01 2009 From: "Richard Tia richtiagh(_)gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Re-submitting a previously 'killed' job in spartan Message-Id: <-38432-090115122626-10331-iCUxmN921Xxj5dK/QEy18Q]=[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Richard Tia" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:26:23 -0500 Sent to CCL by: "Richard Tia" [richtiagh(-)gmail.com] Hi everybody, Please forgive me if my question sounds trivial but I'm new to spartan. If I had to kill a job on spartan '06 for some reason, can I get it to start from where it left off when I re-submit later or it will have to start all over again(from scratch). Thanks in advance for your assistance. Richard Tia KNUST, Kumasi Ghana richtiagh()gmail.com From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Jan 15 13:03:01 2009 From: "Rachelle Joyce Bienstock biensto1#niehs.nih.gov" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Recommendations for computer hardware Message-Id: <-38433-090114134548-9507-OLfRVEHICHvqUaqqvdvRCA(!)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Rachelle Joyce Bienstock" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:45:44 -0500 Sent to CCL by: "Rachelle Joyce Bienstock" [biensto1(-)niehs.nih.gov] I am looking to purchase a new machine to run AMBER, CHARMm, NAMD, Accelrys and Schrodinger software. What would be your recommendations for a machine for optimum performance for these applications and this use (modeling, visualization and simulation): Processor: Intel Core Duo, 2 Duo, 2Quad, 2Extreme?? How many processors? Can the Schrodinger and Accelrys software take advantage of and use multiple processors of this kind? how many? are there particular processors their software is optimized for? 32 bit or 64 bit Linux? How much memory is sufficient? What about stereo? Are there Linux Centos 5 drivers that support Open GL stereo graphics with Nvidia Quadro FX cards? From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Jan 15 13:38:00 2009 From: "Mohamed Abdulhameed mabdu3+/-email.uky.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: clustering docked poses Message-Id: <-38434-090115130824-31813-MQwEw5E67ds5F8ifYeK1aA^^^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Mohamed Abdulhameed" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:08:20 -0500 Sent to CCL by: "Mohamed Abdulhameed" [mabdu3:+:email.uky.edu] Hello everyone, I had docked some 80 ligands to my target protein and got 100 docked poses for each ligand. I would like to cluster the poses (based on RMSD). I think this will help me to quickly select the more distinct poses. It will be helpful if anyone can tell me how I can do the clustering of poses. Is there any free software to do this? It will also be helpful if anyone can point out some links/websites towards clustering of compounds. Thank you for your time. regards, Mohamed Diwan Graduate student College of Pharmacy University of Kentucky From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Jan 15 15:58:00 2009 From: "Kyle Beran beran_k*utpb.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Re-submitting a previously 'killed' job in spartan Message-Id: <-38435-090115153136-4861-MJHR9TE2ze2CdY2EbeVBug*_*server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Kyle Beran" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:58:52 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Kyle Beran" [beran_k(_)utpb.edu] Richard I've used various versions of Spartan for ~8 years. Sorry, but it will have to start over from scratch (or, I've never read anything to the effect of re-starting a calculation from the point at which it was killed). Regards, Kyle -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry+beran_k==utpb.edu,+,ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry+beran_k==utpb.edu,+,ccl.net] On Behalf Of Richard Tia richtiagh(_)gmail.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:26 AM To: Beran, Kyle Subject: CCL: Re-submitting a previously 'killed' job in spartan Sent to CCL by: "Richard Tia" [richtiagh(-)gmail.com] Hi everybody, Please forgive me if my question sounds trivial but I'm new to spartan. If I had to kill a job on spartan '06 for some reason, can I get it to start > from where it left off when I re-submit later or it will have to start all over again(from scratch). Thanks in advance for your assistance. Richard Tia KNUST, Kumasi Ghana richtiagh,,gmail.comhttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Jan 15 22:55:00 2009 From: "David Gallagher gallagher.da_+_gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Modelling whole proteins with quantum chemistry Message-Id: <-38436-090115224255-9861-DhvkCYMZPYuc+pChcLNVDw#,#server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: David Gallagher Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_46162140==.ALT" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:42:39 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: David Gallagher [gallagher.da[*]gmail.com] --=====================_46162140==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Modelling whole proteins with quantum chemistry A review on the modelling of whole proteins including metalloenzymes, using the new PM6 semiempirical method and linear scaling algorithm (Mozyme) in MOPAC2009 has just been published in the Journal of Molecular Modelling. The review includes numerous examples, including a simple enzyme reaction coordinate, salt-bridges, ion channels, comparisons with other computational methods and X-ray crystal structures, and discussions on the advantages and limitations. The link to the full text, "Application of the PM6 method to modeling proteins", is at http://www.cacheresearch.com/mopac.html#mopac-support (at the end of the MOPAC bibliography). MOPAC2009, released in November 2008, is available free to academics. Enjoy, David Gallagher CACheResearch.com --=====================_46162140==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Modelling whole proteins with quantum chemistry

A review on the modelling of whole proteins including metalloenzymes, using the new PM6 semiempirical method and linear scaling algorithm (Mozyme) in MOPAC2009 has just been published in the Journal of Molecular Modelling.

The review includes numerous examples, including a simple enzyme reaction coordinate, salt-bridges, ion channels, comparisons with other computational methods and X-ray crystal structures, and discussions on the advantages and limitations. 

The link to the full text, "Application of the PM6 method to modeling proteins", is at
http://www.cacheresearch.com/mopac.html#mopac-support (at the end of the MOPAC bibliography).

MOPAC2009, released in November 2008, is available free to academics.

Enjoy,
David Gallagher
CACheResearch.com --=====================_46162140==.ALT--