From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 05:25:01 2008 From: "Vivek Sharma vivek.viv.sharma*gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Linux cluster for QM calculations Message-Id: <-37497-080807052239-13417-NOFQBK0Aivs/ku4b4wfBPA~~server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Vivek Sharma" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:22:36 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Vivek Sharma" [vivek.viv.sharma-,-gmail.com] Dear CCL people, I have seen some emails on CCL; people asking about cluster/computer configurations for QM calculations, thus I also would like to know a bit. Actually, I would like to have a little feedback on the linux cluster we are building. We because of lack of technical expertise, are keeping the things on low profile and would like to improve from there. The main idea is to have a separate cluster (which will be improved in due course of time) for QM calculations. We are starting with 2-node system: a) 2.2 - 2.6GHz AMD Athlon per node. b) 3GB RAM per node. c) 160GB per node HDD. d) Server Class Motherboard per node and possibly extra-slots for increasing RAM and HDD capacity. e) Good graphics card per node. f) DVD ROM per node. g) 2 Ethernet adaptors per node. h) Misc: 1 Monitor, Cables, etc. And, most probably we will be buying these machines of some BRAND (as we would like to have maintenance available in case of problems). And for OS also, we are thinking about RHEL 5 (with package for HPC) (again for maintenance reasons). I apologise if details mentioned here are not-so-specific, but any input will be of great help. First question is that does this configuration sound decent, sure there is no-upper limit for QM calculations, but for starting purposes, does it look okay OR to say, where it seems utmost to improve, PROCESSORS or Memory (?). Secondly, how easy/difficult it is to further add-up the hardware, say nodes of different configuration from previous ones (?). Also, any little inputs regarding the possible programs, which can be parallelised easily over such a machine, will be helpful too. Thanks very much in advance, Vivek Sharma vivek.viv.sharmaATgmail.com IMM, India. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 07:29:00 2008 From: "Arun Venkatnathan arunv1973|a|yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37498-080807054744-23794-XYVgB2RjeYZeuKEuwYdl4g * server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Arun Venkatnathan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-542571277-1218098851=:63033" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:47:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Arun Venkatnathan [arunv1973*o*yahoo.com] --0-542571277-1218098851=:63033 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All, I am looking for a free computational Chemistry software(s) which works in = Windows operating systems which can do simple ab initio calculations as wel= l as molecular mechanics. This will be used primarily as a teaching tool fo= r 2nd and 3rd year undergraduate students.=A0 Additionally, software which = can display orbitals etc will also be useful as a teaching tool.=20 Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or pointers towards = any free software will be deeply appreciated. Thanks, Arun=20 Dr. Arun Venkatnathan Assistant Professor, Chemistry Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune India. 411021=20 Tel: 91-20-2590-8044 =0A=0A=0A --0-542571277-1218098851=:63033 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Dear All,

I am looking for a free computational Chemistry software(s) which works in Windows operating systems which can do simple ab initio calculations as well as molecular mechanics. This will be used primarily as a teaching tool for 2nd and 3rd year undergraduate students.  Additionally, software which can display orbitals etc will also be useful as a teaching tool.

Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or pointers towards any free software will be deeply appreciated.

Thanks,
Arun

Dr. Arun Venkatnathan
Assistant Professor, Chemistry
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune
India. 411021
Tel: 91-20-2590-8044


--0-542571277-1218098851=:63033-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 09:33:01 2008 From: "Anatoli Korkin a_korkin__yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37499-080807093216-771-xQ7EbTtdeIdi7SQo6OFY8w-x-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Anatoli Korkin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:32:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Anatoli Korkin [a_korkin_+_yahoo.com] Check this if you wish: http://asdn.net/asdn/links/software.shtml --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Arun Venkatnathan arunv1973|a|yahoo.com wrote: > From: Arun Venkatnathan arunv1973|a|yahoo.com > Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software > To: "Korkin, Anatoli " > Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008, 1:47 AM > Dear All, > > I am looking for a free computational Chemistry software(s) > which works in Windows operating systems which can do simple > ab initio calculations as well as molecular mechanics. This > will be used primarily as a teaching tool for 2nd and 3rd > year undergraduate students. Additionally, software which > can display orbitals etc will also be useful as a teaching > tool. > > Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or > pointers towards any free software will be deeply > appreciated. > > Thanks, > Arun > > Dr. Arun Venkatnathan > Assistant Professor, Chemistry > Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune > India. 411021 > Tel: 91-20-2590-8044 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 10:08:01 2008 From: "Igor Filippov Contr igorf(-)helix.nih.gov" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Linux cluster for QM calculations Message-Id: <-37500-080807092924-499-3FGNnPUlwe5pwOlFssdnsQ]~[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Igor Filippov [Contr]" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:31:22 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Igor Filippov [Contr]" [igorf:helix.nih.gov] Dear Vivek, > a) 2.2 - 2.6GHz AMD Athlon per node. I would suggest quad-core Intel Core 2 cpu's. You will get more cpu horsepower at this point. > b) 3GB RAM per node. Definitely more RAM. Get a slower CPU if you have to, but 2Gb RAM per core is what I would recommend. If you lack cpu power you will simply have to wait longer for your computation to complete, if you don't have enough RAM your computation may not run at all. > c) 160GB per node HDD. Same for the disk space. Not sure what kind of calculations you're planning to run, but it's quite possible to run out of local disk. 750 Gb hdd's are the best price/capacity point at the moment I believe. > d) Server Class Motherboard per node and possibly extra-slots for increasing > RAM and HDD capacity. Make sure it's compatible with Linux. > e) Good graphics card per node. What for? If it's a cluster node the graphics card is pretty much useless. > f) DVD ROM per node. > g) 2 Ethernet adaptors per node. > h) Misc: 1 Monitor, Cables, etc. Hardware-wise I suggest you invest in good power supplies and CPU fans. Regular stock cpu fans that some name brands put inside will not cut it on a PC that runs heavy computations 24/7. > > And, most probably we will be buying these machines of some BRAND (as we would like to have maintenance available in case of problems). And for OS also, we are thinking about RHEL 5 (with package for HPC) (again for maintenance reasons). Oh, I would definitely not recommend buying a name brand. Personally I prefer something that is built from components I can get at a local store so that I can fix things myself. But your mileage may wary of course. As for the software I would point you to CentOS and OSCAR - http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/trac/oscar with OSCAR you can add more nodes in minutes and it has popular TORQUE batch system and a good set of other cluster tools. Hope this helps, Igor > > I apologise if details mentioned here are not-so-specific, but any input will be of great help. First question is that does this configuration sound decent, sure there is no-upper limit for QM calculations, but for starting purposes, does it look okay OR to say, where it seems utmost to improve, PROCESSORS or Memory (?). Secondly, how easy/difficult it is to further add-up the hardware, say nodes of different configuration from previous ones (?). Also, any little inputs regarding the possible programs, which can be parallelised easily over such a machine, will be helpful too. > > Thanks very much in advance, > > > Vivek Sharma > vivek.viv.sharmaATgmail.com > IMM, India.> -- Igor Filippov [Contr] From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 10:44:00 2008 From: "Mr shabbir shabbir*_*nenu.edu.cn" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Crysallographic structure Vs optimized Message-Id: <-37501-080806075208-8167-sKFt/Hgs6iQYNm6ZnvScbw-#-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Mr shabbir" Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:52:02 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Mr shabbir" [shabbir__nenu.edu.cn] Hello CCL users! I am a in some confusion want to explain it. Please If some one have an idea let me know also. I have taken a crystallographic structure and optimized it using Gaussian03 with C2 symmetry and b3lyp/6-31G* method. After optimization it gave me a round about planer structure. After this I have calculated its UV and IR spectra that is in good agreement with experimental values but the crystallographic structure has a dihedral angle 40 degree with side pyrrol rings which is not in my optimized structure. So can I say that my Gassphase optimized structure is reliable on the basis of calculated experimental values and start my futher calculations? Secondly I tried to freeze that dihedral angle using guessview but it could not freeze during optimization. How to freeze dihedral angle during optimization so that it will not change during calculations? Mr.Shabbir Northeast normal university Changchun P.R.China shabbir . nenu.edu.cn From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 11:18:01 2008 From: "Andrew Dalke dalke\a/dalkescientific.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Python training for cheminformatics Message-Id: <-37502-080806090108-26752-KdzIrYpOt9ShTJchp6vsRw(0)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Andrew Dalke Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:00:51 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Sent to CCL by: Andrew Dalke [dalke.:.dalkescientific.com] Hello all, I will be teaching a two-day training course in Python programming in Leipzig, Germany on 6-7 October. This course is designed for cheminformatics researchers who want to be more effective at the software side of their work. If you are interested in participating in the course, please contact me. For more details see http://dalkescientific.com/training/ . I am also tentatively planning a course in the San Francisco Bay Area in early December. Andrew dalke_+_dalkescientific.com From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 11:53:01 2008 From: "=?utf-8?Q?_Jorge_Rodr=C3=ADguez_Becerra?= jorberr[*]ciq.uchile.cl" To: CCL Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? Message-Id: <-37503-080806020142-4322-TEXtMUhB7lpQDeisQ9yW0A__server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: =?utf-8?Q?_Jorge_Rodr=C3=ADguez_Becerra?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 01:32:52 -0400 (CLT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: =?utf-8?Q?_Jorge_Rodr=C3=ADguez_Becerra?= [jorberr%x%ciq.uchile.cl] Hi, I have a system that present two ligand in the same active site (pi-stacking interactions between ligand). So, in the autodock 4 program I can`t use this dimer system becouse autodock recognizes only one ligand of the dimer (a connectivity problem). If someone can help me. Because I don't knwon, how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? I will greatly appreciate it if someone helps me Jorge R From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 12:28:01 2008 From: "Jorge Rodriguez jorberr]_[ciq.uchile.cl" To: CCL Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site active with autodock? Message-Id: <-37504-080806013750-27753-aUHecUVBCKmAcWPfI1SXkg^_^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Jorge Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 01:37:46 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Jorge Rodriguez" [jorberr++ciq.uchile.cl] Hi, I have a system that present two ligand in the same active site (pi-stacking interactions between ligand). So, in the autodock 4 program I can`t use this dimer system becouse autodock recognizes only one ligand of the dimer (a connectivity problem). If someone can help me. Because I don't konw, how I can dock two ligand at same site active? I will greatly appreciate it if someone helps me From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 13:03:02 2008 From: "Alcides Simao alsimao(0)gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37505-080807103904-8094-GYHusExZavBa6ZJ3UjxeaA^_^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Alcides Simao" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13330_28831582.1218118171418" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:09:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Alcides Simao" [alsimao*_*gmail.com] ------=_Part_13330_28831582.1218118171418 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello Arun! There are multiple software to choose from! But be CAREFUL with the licenses :) I personally recomend GAMESS! http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/ GAMESS is fully featured on ab initio, semi-empiric and has the basis for MM calculations NWCHEM is another free, research-grade software, but it has a little more restrictive license. Another good package is ORCA http://ewww.mpi-muelheim.mpg.de/bac/logins/downloads_en.php For DFT calculations, OCTOPUS ( http://www.tddft.org/ ) , as well as abinit (http://www.atypon-link.com/OLD/doi/pdf/10.1524/zkri.220.5.558.65066) are good choices! Zodiac and Vega ZZ are good programs for Cheminformatics and MM work :) Tinker is also a good program! http://homepage.mac.com/swain/Macinchem/page11/page11.html <- Zodiac http://www.ddl.unimi.it/vega/index.htm <- Vega ZZ http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/ <- Tinker I hope this helps you :) ------=_Part_13330_28831582.1218118171418 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Hello Arun!

There are multiple software to choose from! But be CAREFUL with the licenses :)

I personally recomend GAMESS!

http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/

GAMESS is fully featured on ab initio, semi-empiric and has the basis for MM calculations

NWCHEM is another free, research-grade software, but it has a little more restrictive license.

Another good package is ORCA

http://ewww.mpi-muelheim.mpg.de/bac/logins/downloads_en.php

For DFT calculations, OCTOPUS ( http://www.tddft.org/ ) , as well as abinit (http://www.atypon-link.com/OLD/doi/pdf/10.1524/zkri.220.5.558.65066) are good choices!

Zodiac and Vega ZZ are good programs for Cheminformatics and MM work :) Tinker is also a good program!

http://homepage.mac.com/swain/Macinchem/page11/page11.html <- Zodiac
http://www.ddl.unimi.it/vega/index.htm <- Vega ZZ
http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/ <- Tinker

I hope this helps you :)
------=_Part_13330_28831582.1218118171418-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 13:39:01 2008 From: "Conley, Michael mconley#,#leadscope.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: FDA SAR-ready Carcinogenicity Database Now Available Message-Id: <-37506-080807100822-17124-uKWEKcgoaIGbM1wTTtE1xw^_^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Conley, Michael" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8F892.71D28670" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:35:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Conley, Michael" [mconley:+:leadscope.com] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8F892.71D28670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Columbus, Ohio August 1, 2008 - Leadscope announces the availability of the FDA SAR-Ready Carcinogenicity Database. =20 =20 The FDA SAR-Ready Carcinogenicity database has been constructed by Leadscope and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) under their Cooperative Research & Development Agreement. This database contains 1,634 SAR structures with 9,557 test results, compiled from non-proprietary FDA records and other sources. Structures are provided in the SAR, neutral and tested forms. =20 All structures and test calls have been verified for accuracy while both structures and data have been balanced to facilitate model training set selection. Toxicity endpoints include Rat Male, Rat Female, Mouse Male and Mouse Female. =20 Loftus Lucas, Leadscope's CEO, said, "The combination of SAR-ready data and Leadscope's model building capability allows scientists to easily build and apply transparent carcinogenicity models." =20 =20 To view a pre-recorded demonstration of the FDA SAR-Ready Carcinogenicity database, visit www.leadscope.com/sar_carcinogenicity_database/ . For further information on this new database or to request on-line demonstration with a Leadscope scientist contact us at info|leadscope.com .=20 =20 =20 Contact: =20 Loftus Lucas Leadscope, Inc. 1393 Dublin Road Columbus, Ohio 43215 Phone: 614-340-1399 Fax: 614-675-3732 Email: info|leadscope.com =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8F892.71D28670 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Columbus, Ohio August 1, 2008 – Leadscope = announces the availability of the FDA SAR-Ready Carcinogenicity Database.  =

 

The FDA SAR-Ready Carcinogenicity database has been constructed = by Leadscope and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) under their Cooperative Research & Development Agreement.  This database = contains 1,634 SAR structures with 9,557 test results, compiled from non-proprietary = FDA records and other sources.  Structures are provided in the SAR, = neutral and tested forms.

 

All structures and test calls have been verified for accuracy = while both structures and data have been balanced to facilitate model training = set selection.  Toxicity endpoints include Rat Male, Rat Female, Mouse = Male and Mouse Female.

 

Loftus Lucas, Leadscope’s CEO, said, “The = combination of SAR-ready data and Leadscope’s model building capability allows scientists to easily build and apply transparent carcinogenicity models.” 

 

To view a pre-recorded demonstration of the FDA SAR-Ready = Carcinogenicity database, visit www.leadscope.com/sar_carcinogenicity_data= base/.  For further information on this new database or to request on-line demonstration with a Leadscope scientist contact us at info|leadscope.com.

 

 

Contact:

 

Loftus Lucas

Leadscope, Inc.

1393 Dublin Road

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Phone: 614-340-1399

Fax:  614-675-3732

Email:  info|leadscope.com 

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8F892.71D28670-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 14:12:02 2008 From: "Sriraj Srinivasan ss537|,|drexel.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37507-080807104435-12801-UP1pVvE8MvjmwdYTJ91/VQ---server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Sriraj Srinivasan Content-Disposition: inline Content-Language: en Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:39:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Sriraj Srinivasan [ss537,,drexel.edu] Hey Arun=2C PC-GAMESS is a good option=2C which is free for download to use on Window= s OS=2E You should also download Macmolplt - the graphical software to vi= ew structures and orbitals=2E Molekel is another free graphical software= that serves the same purpose=2E Best Regards Sriraj ----- Original Message ----- > From=3A =22Arun Venkatnathan arunv1973=7Ca=7Cyahoo=2Ecom=22 =3Cowner-chem= istry=40ccl=2Enet=3E Date=3A Thursday=2C August 7=2C 2008 4=3A47 am Subject=3A CCL=3A Computational Chemistry software =3E Dear All=2C =3E = =3E I am looking for a free computational Chemistry software(s) which = =3E works in Windows operating systems which can do simple ab initio = =3E calculations as well as molecular mechanics=2E This will be used = =3E primarily as a teaching tool for 2nd and 3rd year undergraduate = =3E students=2E=A0 Additionally=2C software which can display orbitals et= c = =3E will also be useful as a teaching tool=2E = =3E = =3E Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or pointers = =3E towards any free software will be deeply appreciated=2E =3E = =3E Thanks=2C =3E Arun = =3E = =3E Dr=2E Arun Venkatnathan =3E Assistant Professor=2C Chemistry =3E Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune =3E India=2E 411021 = =3E Tel=3A 91-20-2590-8044 =3E = =3E = =3E = =3E = =3E From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 14:49:02 2008 From: "Hemant Srivastava hemantkrsri%gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Crysallographic structure Vs optimized Message-Id: <-37508-080807113018-30662-VnuubneqKp0u71cLiWQJbA^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Hemant Srivastava" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:30:02 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Hemant Srivastava" [hemantkrsri+*+gmail.com] Dear Shabbir, For fixing diahedral angle you can write following in input file al last. D 1 2 3 4 F where 1 2 3 4 are atom numbers. For the other problem you have I think you should try different method/basis or solvent calculation. Hope it will help. Hemant Kumar Srivastava, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem =================================== On 8/6/08, Mr shabbir shabbir*_*nenu.edu.cn wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Mr shabbir" [shabbir__nenu.edu.cn] > Hello CCL users! > I am a in some confusion want to explain it. Please If some one have an idea let me know also. > I have taken a crystallographic structure and optimized it using Gaussian03 with C2 symmetry and b3lyp/6-31G* method. After optimization it gave me a round about planer structure. After this I have calculated its UV and IR spectra that is in good agreement with experimental values but the crystallographic structure has a dihedral angle 40 degree with side pyrrol rings which is not in my optimized structure. So can I say that my Gassphase optimized structure is reliable on the basis of calculated experimental values and start my futher calculations? Secondly I tried to freeze that dihedral angle using guessview but it could not freeze during optimization. How to freeze dihedral angle during optimization so that it will not change during calculations? > Mr.Shabbir > Northeast normal university Changchun > P.R.China > shabbir++nenu.edu.cn> > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 15:23:00 2008 From: "Ol Ga eurisco1[*]pochta.ru" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37509-080807113653-3160-V8IESCM5nmz4IKvw9Qi3Bw|server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Ol Ga" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:36:49 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Ol Ga" [eurisco1..pochta.ru] Dear Dr. Arun Venkatnathan, I suggest you to use for your aims 1) the program WinGAMESS (GAMESS US) with Tinker for QC and MM calculations with programs Avogadro (additional and very important features are input file generation and MM calculations internally executing), wxMacMolPlot, gMolden for geometry generation and visualization steps of optimization, orbitals etc. 2) the program ORCA for QC calculation with gMolden, wxMacMolPlot (on .trj-file) as well as Molekel, gOpenMol. The program ORCA is an excellent and robust tool for QC calculations. It will be necessary to generate sometimes .cub and .fch-files for visualization of orbitals etc. Sincerely, Ol Ga PS I use this programs and in this (_1_ and _2_) combinations. ----- Original Message ----- >From: Arun Venkatnathan arunv1973|a|yahoo.com >To: Ga, Ol >Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 12:47 PM >Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software >Dear All, >I am looking for a free computational Chemistry software(s) which works in >Windows operating systems which can do simple ab initio calculations as >well as molecular mechanics. This will be used primarily as a teaching >tool for 2nd and 3rd year undergraduate students. Additionally, software >which can display orbitals etc will also be useful as a teaching tool. >Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or pointers towards >any free software will be deeply appreciated. >Thanks, >Arun From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 15:58:01 2008 From: "Abdul Hameed, MohamedDiwanMo mabdu3!^!email.uky.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? Message-Id: <-37510-080807132738-26253-ofJpuvyGrxbJnMT9VgMt2A-x-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Abdul Hameed, MohamedDiwanMo" Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_62D3F106CB16C34D825A1B75EFBA683901697724CDEX7FM04adukye_" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:31:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Abdul Hameed, MohamedDiwanMo" [mabdu3#,#email.uky.edu] --_000_62D3F106CB16C34D825A1B75EFBA683901697724CDEX7FM04adukye_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, If you know how the two ligands bind, then you can divide the active site a= nd do two separate docking. i.e., (in case of autodock) you can define the = grid such that it covers one part of the active site and dock the ligand. S= imilarly you can dock the second ligand to the other half of active site. Or once you dock and fix the position of first ligand you can try docking t= he second ligand. HTH. Regards, Diwan -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry:ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry:ccl.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:33 AM To: Abdul Hameed, MohamedDiwanMo Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? Sent to CCL by: =3D?utf-8?Q?_Jorge_Rodr=3DC3=3DADguez_Becerra?=3D [jorberr%= x%ciq.uchile.cl] Hi, I have a system that present two ligand in the same active site (pi-sta= cking interactions between ligand). So, in the autodock 4 program I can`t u= se this dimer system becouse autodock recognizes only one ligand of the dim= er (a connectivity problem). If someone can help me. Because I don't knwon,= how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? I will greatly appreciate it if someone helps me Jorge R -=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt--_000_62D3F106CB16C34D825A1B75EFBA683901697724CDEX7FM04adukye_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

If you know how th= e two ligands bind, then you can divide the active site and do two separate docki= ng. i.e., (in case of autodock) you can define the grid such that it covers one part of the active site and dock the ligand. Similarly you can dock the sec= ond ligand to the other half of active site.

Or once you dock a= nd fix the position of first ligand you can try docking the second ligand.  <= o:p>

HTH.

Regards,

Diwan

 <= /span>

-----Original Message-----
> From: owner-chemistry:ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry:ccl.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:33 AM
To: Abdul Hameed, MohamedDiwanMo
Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site acive?

 <= /span>

 <= /span>

Sent to CCL by: =3D?utf-8?Q?_Jorge_Rodr=3DC3=3DADguez_Becerra?=3D [jorberr%x%ciq.uchile.cl]=

Hi, I have a syste= m that present two ligand in the same active site (pi-stacking interactions betwee= n ligand). So, in the autodock 4 program I can`t use this dimer system becous= e autodock recognizes only one ligand of the dimer (a connectivity problem). = If someone can help me. Because I don't knwon, how I can dock two ligand at sa= me site acive?

 <= /span>

I will greatly appreciate it if someone helps me

 <= /span>

Jorge R=

 <= /span>

 <= /span>

 <= /span>

-=3D This is autom= atically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-

To recover the ema= il address of the author of the message, please change

the strange charac= ters on the top line to the : sign. You can also

 <= /span>

E-mail to subscrib= ers: CHEMISTRY:ccl.net or use:

   =   

 <= /span>

   =   

 <= /span>

Subscribe/Unsubscr= ibe:

   =   

 <= /span>

Before posting, ch= eck wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

 <= /span>

Job: http://www.ccl.net/jobs

 <= /span>

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig  (login: ccl, Password: search)

 <= /span>

If your mail bounc= es > from CCL with 5.7.1 error, check:

   =   

 <= /span>

 <= /span>

 <= /span>

--_000_62D3F106CB16C34D825A1B75EFBA683901697724CDEX7FM04adukye_-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 16:32:02 2008 From: "Nicola Zonta nicola.zonta(-)gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37511-080807092919-467-ydYI9r1F1OvkpDM+uEj6Qg:-:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Nicola Zonta Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3--712992961 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:32:55 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v912) Sent to CCL by: Nicola Zonta [nicola.zonta**gmail.com] --Apple-Mail-3--712992961 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Arun, have a look at Zodiac www.zeden.org it is still beta software, but you might find it useful. we've used it quite a lot for teaching purposes. if you have any question please contact me cheers Nicola On 7 Aug 2008, at 10:47, Arun Venkatnathan arunv1973|a|yahoo.com wrote: > Dear All, > > I am looking for a free computational Chemistry software(s) which > works in Windows operating systems which can do simple ab initio > calculations as well as molecular mechanics. This will be used > primarily as a teaching tool for 2nd and 3rd year undergraduate > students. Additionally, software which can display orbitals etc > will also be useful as a teaching tool. > > Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or pointers > towards any free software will be deeply appreciated. > > Thanks, > Arun > > Dr. Arun Venkatnathan > Assistant Professor, Chemistry > Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune > India. 411021 > Tel: 91-20-2590-8044 > > --Apple-Mail-3--712992961 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Arun,

have a look at = Zodiac

it is still beta software, = but you might find it useful. we've used it quite a lot for teaching = purposes.
if you have any question please contact = me

cheers
Nicola = ;

On 7 Aug 2008, at 10:47, Arun Venkatnathan = arunv1973|a|yahoo.com wrote:

Dear All,

I am looking = for a free computational Chemistry software(s) which works in Windows = operating systems which can do simple ab initio calculations as well as = molecular mechanics. This will be used primarily as a teaching tool for = 2nd and 3rd year undergraduate students.  Additionally, software = which can display orbitals etc will also be useful as a teaching tool. =

Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or = pointers towards any free software will be deeply = appreciated.

Thanks,
Arun

Dr. Arun = Venkatnathan
Assistant Professor, Chemistry
Indian Institute of = Science Education and Research Pune
India. 411021
Tel: = 91-20-2590-8044


=

= --Apple-Mail-3--712992961-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 17:11:01 2008 From: "John McKelvey jmmckel]![gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37512-080807152918-24158-Rvk/GIof0+lKu4W83LdwyA^^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "John McKelvey" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_31036_13454685.1218133402508" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:23:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "John McKelvey" [jmmckel*o*gmail.com] ------=_Part_31036_13454685.1218133402508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ORCA is an extremely good free program for academics containing both semi-empirical [INDO/S, MNDO, AM1, PM3, and I think the only pure STO-based NDDO method that follows Pople's original intent and also has analytical derivatives,] as well as _many_ DFT and TDDFT methodologies, and shares many aspects with the very good commercial code TURBOMOLE (there is a lot of code sharing between them). It has very good support, and of course has binaries available in many flavors of hardware/OS for (I think for MAC), Windows, and Linux (AMD and Intel) and I think some 32 and 64 bit versions. Cheers, John McKelvey On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Alcides Simao alsimao(0)gmail.com < owner-chemistry:-:ccl.net> wrote: > Hello Arun! > > There are multiple software to choose from! But be CAREFUL with the > licenses :) > > I personally recomend GAMESS! > > http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/ > > GAMESS is fully featured on ab initio, semi-empiric and has the basis for > MM calculations > > NWCHEM is another free, research-grade software, but it has a little more > restrictive license. > > Another good package is ORCA > > http://ewww.mpi-muelheim.mpg.de/bac/logins/downloads_en.php > > For DFT calculations, OCTOPUS ( http://www.tddft.org/ ) , as well as > abinit ( > http://www.atypon-link.com/OLD/doi/pdf/10.1524/zkri.220.5.558.65066) are > good choices! > > Zodiac and Vega ZZ are good programs for Cheminformatics and MM work :) > Tinker is also a good program! > > http://homepage.mac.com/swain/Macinchem/page11/page11.html <- Zodiac > http://www.ddl.unimi.it/vega/index.htm <- Vega ZZ > http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/ <- Tinker > > I hope this helps you :) > ------=_Part_31036_13454685.1218133402508 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
ORCA is an extremely good free program  for academics containing both semi-empirical [INDO/S, MNDO, AM1, PM3, and I think the only pure STO-based NDDO method that follows Pople's original intent and also has analytical derivatives,]  as well as _many_ DFT and TDDFT methodologies, and shares many aspects with the very good commercial code TURBOMOLE (there is a lot of code sharing between them).  It has very good support, and of course has binaries available in many flavors of hardware/OS for (I think for MAC), Windows, and Linux (AMD and Intel)  and I think some 32 and 64 bit versions.

Cheers,

John McKelvey


On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Alcides Simao alsimao(0)gmail.com <owner-chemistry:-:ccl.net> wrote:
Hello Arun!

There are multiple software to choose from! But be CAREFUL with the licenses :)

I personally recomend GAMESS!

http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/

GAMESS is fully featured on ab initio, semi-empiric and has the basis for MM calculations

NWCHEM is another free, research-grade software, but it has a little more restrictive license.

Another good package is ORCA

http://ewww.mpi-muelheim.mpg.de/bac/logins/downloads_en.php

For DFT calculations, OCTOPUS ( http://www.tddft.org/ ) , as well as abinit (http://www.atypon-link.com/OLD/doi/pdf/10.1524/zkri.220.5.558.65066) are good choices!

Zodiac and Vega ZZ are good programs for Cheminformatics and MM work :) Tinker is also a good program!

http://homepage.mac.com/swain/Macinchem/page11/page11.html <- Zodiac
http://www.ddl.unimi.it/vega/index.htm <- Vega ZZ
http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/ <- Tinker

I hope this helps you :)

------=_Part_31036_13454685.1218133402508-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 17:43:01 2008 From: "Ol Ga eurisco1|,|pochta.ru" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Linux cluster for QM calculations Message-Id: <-37513-080807170546-1258-KVP31wg1rEHoz9JSuRSxbg=server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Ol Ga" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:05:42 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Ol Ga" [eurisco1(0)pochta.ru] Dear Vivek Sharma, I think that it is very important to define architecture (32- or 64-bit) of software/hardware which you will use for QC calculations. The 32-bit architecture has strong limitation in amount of memory. I think the best choice is 64-bit architecture of software/hardware. I intend that there are two variants (good and very good): 1) quad-core CPU + 8GB RAM (minimum) + GAUSSIAN 64-bit (only type %Nproc= and you will get parallelism) 2) dual-socket motherboard with 2 quad-core CPUs (=8 cores) + 16 GB RAM (minimum)+ GAUSSIAN 64-bit You dont need 10 GB Ethernet adaptors in these cases and you will get the small cluster in one box. Sincerely, Ol Ga ps there are other QC program suites which have parallel executing. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vivek Sharma vivek.viv.sharma*gmail.com" To: "Ga, Ol " Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 1:22 PM Subject: CCL: Linux cluster for QM calculations > Sent to CCL by: "Vivek Sharma" [vivek.viv.sharma-,-gmail.com] > Dear CCL people, > > I have seen some emails on CCL; people asking about cluster/computer configurations for QM calculations, thus I also would like to know a bit. Actually, I would like to have a little feedback on the linux cluster we are building. We because of lack of technical expertise, are keeping the things on low profile and would like to improve from there. The main idea is to have a separate cluster (which will be improved in due course of time) for QM calculations. We are starting with 2-node system: > > a) 2.2 - 2.6GHz AMD Athlon per node. > b) 3GB RAM per node. > c) 160GB per node HDD. > d) Server Class Motherboard per node and possibly extra-slots for increasing > RAM and HDD capacity. > e) Good graphics card per node. > f) DVD ROM per node. > g) 2 Ethernet adaptors per node. > h) Misc: 1 Monitor, Cables, etc. > > And, most probably we will be buying these machines of some BRAND (as we would like to have maintenance available in case of problems). And for OS also, we are thinking about RHEL 5 (with package for HPC) (again for maintenance reasons). > > I apologise if details mentioned here are not-so-specific, but any input will be of great help. First question is that does this configuration sound decent, sure there is no-upper limit for QM calculations, but for starting purposes, does it look okay OR to say, where it seems utmost to improve, PROCESSORS or Memory (?). Secondly, how easy/difficult it is to further add-up the hardware, say nodes of different configuration from previous ones (?). Also, any little inputs regarding the possible programs, which can be parallelised easily over such a machine, will be helpful too. > > Thanks very much in advance, > > > Vivek Sharma > vivek.viv.sharmaATgmail.com > IMM, India. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 18:18:01 2008 From: "Oleg Trott trott|scripps.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? Message-Id: <-37514-080807160050-17501-oL06UMTwNkbLmtknmmkdIA%a%server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Oleg Trott" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:05:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Oleg Trott" [trott##scripps.edu] On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Jorge Rodr=EDguez Becerra jorberr[*]ciq.uchile.cl wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: =3D?utf-8?Q?_Jorge_Rodr=3DC3=3DADguez_Becerra?=3D [jorber= r%x%ciq.uchile.cl] > Hi, I have a system that present two ligand in the same active site (pi-s= tacking interactions between ligand). So, in the autodock 4 program I can`t= use this dimer system becouse autodock recognizes only one ligand of the d= imer (a connectivity problem). If someone can help me. Because I don't knwo= n, how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? > > I will greatly appreciate it if someone helps me > > Jorge R Shameless plug: http://www.scripps.edu/~trott/vina/#tutorial (Note that Vina is currently offered for evaluation only, and will likely be non-free for commercial users) --=20 Oleg Trott, Ph.D. (Columbia University) http://olegtrott.com From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 18:56:01 2008 From: "Deskins, Nathaniel A nathaniel.deskins#%#pnl.gov" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Message-Id: <-37515-080807133042-28043-QB42uEgMSeBpRNGmPa3poQ- -server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Deskins, Nathaniel A" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8F8AA.9EC60BE2" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:28:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Deskins, Nathaniel A" [nathaniel.deskins..pnl.gov] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8F8AA.9EC60BE2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You might try NWchem. I believe there is a windows version, at least through cygwin. =20 Also, I think there is PC-Gamess. =20 Arguslab lets you optimize at the semiempirical (AM1/PM3/MNDO) and MM (UFF/Amber) levels. There are probably more semiempirical/MM codes available for windows.=20 =20 Aaron ________________________________ > From: owner-chemistry%a%ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry%a%ccl.net]=20 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 1:48 AM To: Deskins, Nathaniel A Subject: CCL: Computational Chemistry software Dear All, I am looking for a free computational Chemistry software(s) which works in Windows operating systems which can do simple ab initio calculations as well as molecular mechanics. This will be used primarily as a teaching tool for 2nd and 3rd year undergraduate students. Additionally, software which can display orbitals etc will also be useful as a teaching tool.=20 Any recommendations on choice of software for teaching or pointers towards any free software will be deeply appreciated. Thanks, Arun=20 Dr. Arun Venkatnathan Assistant Professor, Chemistry Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune India. 411021=20 Tel: 91-20-2590-8044 =09 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8F8AA.9EC60BE2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You might try NWchem. I believe there is a windows = version, at=20 least through cygwin.
 
Also, I think there is PC-Gamess.
 
Arguslab lets you optimize at the semiempirical = (AM1/PM3/MNDO) and=20 MM (UFF/Amber) levels. There are probably more semiempirical/MM codes = available=20 for windows.
 
Aaron


From: owner-chemistry%a%ccl.net=20 [mailto:owner-chemistry%a%ccl.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, = 2008 1:48=20 AM
To: Deskins, Nathaniel A
Subject: CCL: = Computational=20 Chemistry software

Dear All,

I am looking for a free = computational=20 Chemistry software(s) which works in Windows operating systems = which can=20 do simple ab initio calculations as well as molecular mechanics. = This will=20 be used primarily as a teaching tool for 2nd and 3rd year = undergraduate=20 students.  Additionally, software which can display orbitals = etc will=20 also be useful as a teaching tool.

Any recommendations on = choice=20 of software for teaching or pointers towards any free software = will be=20 deeply appreciated.

Thanks,
Arun

Dr. Arun=20 Venkatnathan
Assistant Professor, Chemistry
Indian Institute = of=20 Science Education and Research Pune
India. 411021
Tel:=20 = 91-20-2590-8044


------_=_NextPart_001_01C8F8AA.9EC60BE2-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 19:59:00 2008 From: "Oleg Trott trott~~scripps.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site acive? Message-Id: <-37516-080807195733-27021-SBxvc/JAXOs2+LjD45Y4zQ##server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Oleg Trott" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:57:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Oleg Trott" [trott]-[scripps.edu] On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Abdul Hameed, MohamedDiwanMo mabdu3!^!email.uky.edu > ... once you dock and fix the position of first ligand you can try docking the second ligand. This approach might not necessarily lead to an "optimal" arrangement of the ligands. Think of the first ligand as a car that gets parked in the middle of two adjacent parking spots, preventing the second driver > from finding a spot. Oleg -- Oleg Trott, Ph.D. (Columbia University) http://olegtrott.com From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Thu Aug 7 20:35:01 2008 From: "Danni Harris danni===simbiosys.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL: how I can dock two ligand at same site active with autodock? Message-Id: <-37517-080807182740-2682-3r3KwIhMrNa76QU7agVLTA**server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Danni Harris" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:25:13 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Danni Harris" [danni#simbiosys.ca] Jorge This is not a precise solution to your problem in that ideally one would simultaneously dock both components of the pi-stacked dimers. With that caveat as a preface, I happened to be interested in a problem underlying non-classical inhibition in P450s ---with relevance non-sigmoidal kinetics (and hetero- and homocooperativity i.e. allosterism). I actually used an approximate approach that involved a buildup procedure---that I termed heirarchical docking the details of which are present in two papers: Cheng D, Harris D, Reed JR, Backes WL. Arch Biochem Biophys . 2007 Dec 15;468(2):174-82. and Arch Biochem Biophys . 2007 Jun 1;462(1):28-37 This involves an approximate buildup procedure---wherein you dock the 1st component (ligand) then for 'each solution' prepare a set of grids for that solution and dock the 2nd. While I did this with autodock4---you could use this approach in principle with any single ligand docking approach (Gold,eHiTS,Glide). I think a I think that Jim Halpert's group and another group in Michigan has used such an approach to get at phenomenology in non-competitive inhibition.... I would also add that eHiTS from SimBioSys has explicit scoring terms for Pi-Pi stacking and Pi ----cation interactions---but I have never repeated my recent P450 study with this approach (perhaps I should). Again in closing I emphacize that iterative buildup procedure is not the absolutely correct theoretical procedure---but as shown in the references above it did shed light on the phenomenology underlying a set of complementary competitive and non-competitive inhibition CYP2B4 studies in Wayne Backes laboratory. Best. Dan Harris "Jorge Rodriguez jorberr]_[ciq.uchile.cl" wrote: Sent to CCL by: "Jorge Rodriguez" [jorberr++ciq.uchile.cl] Hi, I have a system that present two ligand in the same active site (pi-stacking interactions between ligand). So, in the autodock 4 program I can`t use this dimer system becouse autodock recognizes only one ligand of the dimer (a connectivity problem). If someone can help me. Because I don't konw, how I can dock two ligand at same site active? I will greatly appreciate it if someone helps me