From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 07:28:01 2007 From: "Guermoune Abdeladim lguermoune,+,hotmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: AIM calculation Message-Id: <-34512-070619072530-23827-8tlCOveDtdhP1Qvbt71e9g---server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Guermoune Abdeladim" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:25:27 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Guermoune Abdeladim" [lguermoune(0)hotmail.com] Dear Netters, I have asked a few days ago about AIM, and I have proposed my problem. So up to now the problem has not been resolved. Fortunately used of NBO analysis with resonance keyword, it gives some good results. Thank you everyone who answered my question, and raising an interesting remarks about AIM calculation. Guermoune Abdeladim. University Cadi Ayyad Marrakech Morocco. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 10:22:01 2007 From: "Amandeep S. Sidhu asidhu^biomap.org" To: CCL Subject: CCL: CFP: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (IEEE BIBM 2007) Message-Id: <-34513-070618175407-21528-o6QdU0kPSCDdHYuddmRVVA/a\server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Amandeep S. Sidhu" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:53:39 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Amandeep S. Sidhu" [asidhu,+,biomap.org] 2007 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (IEEE BIBM 2007) (co-located with IEEE/WCI/ACM WI-IAT 07 and IEEE GrC 07) http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/thu/bibm/index.php.htm San Jose, CA, USA Nov 2-4, 2007 IEEE BIBM 2007 will provide a general forum for disseminating the latest research in bioinformatics and biomedicine. It is a multidisciplinary conference that brings together academic and industrial scientists from computer science, biology, chemistry, medicine, mathematics and statistics. It will exchange research results and address open issues in all aspects of bioinformatics and biomedicine and provide a forum for the presentation of work in databases, algorithms, interfaces, visualization, modeling, simulation, ontology and other computational methods, as applied to life science problems, with emphasis on applications in high throughput data-rich areas in biology, biomedical engineering. IEEE BIBM 2007 intends to attract a balanced combination of computer scientists, biologists, biomedical engineers, chemist, data analyzer, statistician. Topics of interests We are soliciting high quality original research papers (including significant works-in-progress) in any aspect of bioinformatics and biomedicine. New computational techniques and methods in machine learning; data mining; text analysis; pattern recognition; knowledge representation; databases; data modeling; combinatorics; stochastic modeling; string and graph algorithms; linguistic methods; robotics; constraint satisfaction; data visualization; parallel computation; data integration; modeling and simulation and heir application in life science domain are especially encouraged. Relevant topics included, but are not limited to: • Biological Data Mining • High Performance Bio-computing • Genomics, Comparative Genomics • Biological Databases & Data Integration • Biological Data Visualization • Evolution and Phylogeny • Molecular sequence analysis • Healthcare Informatics • Recognition of genes and regulatory elements • Molecular evolution • Proteomics, Protein structure, Computational proteomics • Gene networks, Computational genetics • Combinatorial libraries and drug design • Computational systems biology • Microarray design and data analysis • BioOntologies • Sequence Analysis • Structural and functional genomics • Synthetic Biological Systems • Pathways, Networks , Systems Biology • Text Mining & Information Extraction • Transcriptomics • BioMedical Devices with Embedded Computers • Signal and Image Processing in BioMedicine • BioMedical Image Segmentation and Compression • BioMedical Intelligence and Data Warehousing • BioMedical Databases & Information Systems , BioMedical Information • Multimedia Biomedical Databases • Intelligent Biomedical Knowledge Discovery • Modeling signalling network • Temporal and spatial mining of clinic data including medical images MEETING ORGANIZATION: GENERAL CO-CHAIRS: Prof. Yi Pan Department of Computer Science Georgia State University 34 Peachtree Street, Suite 1450 Atlanta, GA 30302-4110, USA Prof. Carmelina Ruggiero Editor-in-chief of IEEE Trans. on NanoBioscience Professor of Bioengineering DIST University of Genoa Via Opera Pia 13 Genoa, 16145, Italy Prof. Aydin Tozeren Distinguished Professor and Director, Center for Integrated Bioinformatics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science & Health Systems Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA PROGRAM CO-CHAIRS: Prof. Xiaohua Hu College of Information Science & Technology Drexel University Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA Prof. Zoran Obradovic Center for Information Science and Technology, Temple University, 303 Wachman Hall (038-24), 1805 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. Prof. Ion Mandoiu Computer Science & Engineering Department University of Connecticut 371 Fairfield Way, Unit 2155 Storrs, CT 06269-2155 Office: ITEB 261 WORKSHOP CHAIRS: Jinyan Li Institute for Infocomm Research, Singapore Xue-Wen Chen Univ. of Kansas, USA Tharam S. Dillon Curtin University of Technology, Australia TUTORIAL CHAIR: Sun Kim Indiana University, USA LOCAL ACCOMMODATION CO-CHAIRS: David Scot Taylor San José State University, USA Tom Qi Zhang Google, USA PUBLICITY CO-CHAIRS: Amandeep S. Sidhu Curtin University of Technology, Australia Shuigeng Zhou Fudan University, China IEEE BIBM CO-CHAIRS/DIRECTORS: Xiaohua Hu Drexel University, USA Yi Pan Georgia State University, USA IEEE BIBM STEERING COMMITTEE: Xiaohua Hu Drexel University, USA Vipin Kumar Univ. of Minnesota, USA Michael Ng HongKong Baptist University, China Zoran Obradovic Temple University, USA Yi Pan Georgia State University, USA Jose Principe Univ. of Florida, USA Carmelina Ruggiero DIST University of Genoa, Italy Niilo Saranummi VTT Information Technology, Finland Shusaku Tsumoto Shimane University, Japan SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Please submit a full length paper (not exceeding 5000 words) thorough the online submission system (The paper format is very flexible, if you prefer to prepare your paper in IEEE 2-column format, you can download the format instruction here for Latex or word). Electronic submissions (in PDF or Postscript format) are required. Accepted papers will be published in the conference proceedings by the IEEE Computer Society Press that are indexed by EI. The Best papers selected from the IEEE BIBM 07 will be published as a special issue in related IEEE Transactions and other journals such as IJDMB, IJBRA etc. IMPORTANT DATES: Paper submission: June 30, 2007 Notification: August 1, 2007 Camera-ready due: August 20, 2007 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 11:00:01 2007 From: "Kanchana Thanthiriwatte sahanchem^yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Spherical <--> Cartesian interconversion Message-Id: <-34514-070619023530-18284-lph1d/9M5cpjiJA+e9QFsw|,|server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Kanchana Thanthiriwatte" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:35:26 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Kanchana Thanthiriwatte" [sahanchem*o*yahoo.com] Dear CCLers, I need to convert Cartesian values to Spherical Harmonics values and again Spherical Harmonics values to Cartesian values. I have found following paper. (H.B. Schlegel, M.J. Frisch, Int. J. Quantum. Chem., (1995),54, 83-87.). I need to know that the transformation matrix is same for following Cartesian to spherical conversions. 1) Cartesian Gaussian primitives <-->spherical Gaussian primitives 2) Cartesian integrals <--> Spherical integrals 3) Cartesian multipoler moments <--> Spherical multipoler moments The above paper explains Cartesian Gaussian primitives <-->spherical Gaussian primitives. I consider Cartesian integrals and multipoler moments. Does the transformation matrix same for other two types (integrals and moments)? Or if it is different how do I convert them? Regards, -Sahan- Kanchana S. Thanthiriwatte Department of Chemistry Mississippi State University Box 9573 Mississippi State, MS 39762 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 11:34:00 2007 From: "Ken W. Browne kbrowne^_^technologynetworks.net" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Virtual Discovery Conference, London, 24-26 Oct Message-Id: <-34515-070619042836-31650-pn+ZGqAgxEFDqIVJSDK/rA%a%server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Ken W. Browne" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:28:32 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Ken W. Browne" [kbrowne- -technologynetworks.net] I would just like to draw your attention to this conference which may be interest to the group. It will include presentations on virtual screening, in silico ADMET and aspects of computational chemistry and cheminformatics. Speakers will include: Martin Harrison Associate Principal Scientist AstraZeneca Hugo Kubinyi Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of Heidelberg Paul Malthouse Professor Head of Biochemistry University College Dublin Malcolm Walkinshaw Professor of Structural Biochemistry University of Edinburgh The full agenda has just been released on www.VirtualDiscovery.net Best Wishes, Ken From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 12:32:00 2007 From: "Jennifer Clare Brookes ucapjcb a ucl.ac.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Conformer calculations Message-Id: <-34516-070619122741-27715-63TLnH6DkIfUvT50SxGRnw:-:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Jennifer Clare Brookes" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:27:38 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Jennifer Clare Brookes" [ucapjcb ~~ ucl.ac.uk] Hi everyone, I am looking at the flexibility of 6-membered rings, in particular that of methyl-R-gamma cyclogeranate, using Gaussian 03. What I would like to do is increment the dihedral angle between 4 of the atoms in this molecule (by about 2 degrees) so that it switches from boat to chair. At each geometry change I would like to fix the coordinates of these atoms and do a constrained optimization on the rest of the molecule. This using a semi-emperical method like AM1. It looks like I can use Model Builder in Gaussian to increment the dihedral and then fix these atoms as constants, and the rest as variables and optimize. I have had a look at the manual, but I am stuck as to how to go about this, please does anyone have any tips or examples? Thank you for any advice! Jenny From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 13:18:01 2007 From: "John McKelvey jmmckel^_^gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Various hardware for DFT and TDDFT calculation Message-Id: <-34517-070619112852-21206-soeyZvYaGV439UAMqSy5PQ[-]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "John McKelvey" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_99685_3300298.1182266923633" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:28:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "John McKelvey" [jmmckel-.-gmail.com] ------=_Part_99685_3300298.1182266923633 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Folks, I have two linux boxes, a dual XEON/2.4GHZ, and a dual-dual AMD/2.0. [which I really like, and got the latter complete system cpu box with 4gigs memory for a little over $$2100].. Am now looking at a dual-Quad/2.33 Intel box for less than $3000. Anyone have any comments about relative timngs on the dual-Quad intel box vs the dual-dual AMD box? I know that the memory controller issue is better for the AMD. Don't expect to see the dual-Quad to be twice as fast, as the AMD, but am curious about relative timings. Many thanks! John McKelvey PS: If you are looking for a very reliable vendor who builds to specs and backs up their 3-year warranty dependably and with no hassle, look at www.jncs.com. I've bought 7 mobos or systems from them and have had to exchange only two memory sticks, which they let cross in the mail during the exchange. They pack things for shipping very, very reliably, including complete systems. ------=_Part_99685_3300298.1182266923633 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Folks,

I have two linux boxes, a dual XEON/2.4GHZ, and a dual-dual AMD/2.0. [which I really like, and got the latter complete system cpu box  with 4gigs memory for a little over $$2100]..  Am now looking at a dual-Quad/2.33 Intel box for less than $3000.  Anyone have any comments about relative timngs on the dual-Quad intel box vs the dual-dual AMD box?  I know that the memory controller issue is better for the AMD.  Don't expect to see the dual-Quad to be twice as fast, as the AMD, but am curious about relative timings. 

Many thanks!

John McKelvey

PS:  If you are looking for a very reliable vendor who builds to specs and backs up their 3-year warranty dependably and with no hassle, look at www.jncs.com.  I've bought 7 mobos or systems from them and have had to exchange only two memory sticks, which they let cross in the mail during the exchange.  They pack things for shipping very, very reliably, including complete systems.
------=_Part_99685_3300298.1182266923633-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 15:10:01 2007 From: "Alex A. Granovsky gran * classic.chem.msu.su" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Various hardware for DFT and TDDFT calculation Message-Id: <-34518-070619144244-27740-EsNfr6an51/cN72tvjlIVA]~[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Alex A. Granovsky" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0076_01C7B2C4.E5EAE860" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:55:14 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Alex A. Granovsky" [gran{:}classic.chem.msu.su] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C7B2C4.E5EAE860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, the PC GAMESS homepage at MSU has lots of benchmark data, including DFT = ones.=20 http://classic.chem.msu.su/gran/gamess Best regards, Alex Granovsky ----- Original Message -----=20 From: John McKelvey jmmckel^_^gmail.com=20 To: Granovsky, Alex, A. =20 Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 7:28 PM Subject: CCL: Various hardware for DFT and TDDFT calculation Folks, I have two linux boxes, a dual XEON/2.4GHZ, and a dual-dual AMD/2.0. = [which I really like, and got the latter complete system cpu box with = 4gigs memory for a little over $$2100].. Am now looking at a = dual-Quad/2.33 Intel box for less than $3000. Anyone have any comments = about relative timngs on the dual-Quad intel box vs the dual-dual AMD = box? I know that the memory controller issue is better for the AMD. = Don't expect to see the dual-Quad to be twice as fast, as the AMD, but = am curious about relative timings. =20 Many thanks! John McKelvey PS: If you are looking for a very reliable vendor who builds to specs = and backs up their 3-year warranty dependably and with no hassle, look = at www.jncs.com. I've bought 7 mobos or systems from them and have had = to exchange only two memory sticks, which they let cross in the mail = during the exchange. They pack things for shipping very, very reliably, = including complete systems.=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C7B2C4.E5EAE860 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
 
the PC GAMESS homepage at MSU has lots=20 of benchmark data, including DFT ones.
 
http://classic.chem.msu.s= u/gran/gamess
 
Best regards,
Alex Granovsky
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John=20 McKelvey jmmckel^_^gmail.com
To: Granovsky, Alex, A. =
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 = 7:28=20 PM
Subject: CCL: Various hardware = for DFT=20 and TDDFT calculation

Folks,

I have two linux boxes, a dual = XEON/2.4GHZ, and a=20 dual-dual AMD/2.0. [which I really like, and got the latter complete = system=20 cpu box  with 4gigs memory for a little over $$2100]..  Am = now=20 looking at a dual-Quad/2.33 Intel box for less than $3000.  = Anyone have=20 any comments about relative timngs on the dual-Quad intel box vs the = dual-dual=20 AMD box?  I know that the memory controller issue is better for = the=20 AMD.  Don't expect to see the dual-Quad to be twice as fast, as = the AMD,=20 but am curious about relative timings. 

Many = thanks!

John=20 McKelvey

PS:  If you are looking for a very reliable = vendor who=20 builds to specs and backs up their 3-year warranty dependably and with = no=20 hassle, look at www.jncs.com.  I've=20 bought 7 mobos or systems from them and have had to exchange only two = memory=20 sticks, which they let cross in the mail during the exchange.  = They pack=20 things for shipping very, very reliably, including complete systems.=20
------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C7B2C4.E5EAE860-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 15:53:01 2007 From: "sachin tyagi sachintyagi1#,#gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: subscription cancellation Message-Id: <-34519-070619154547-15773-62EiRe2DRUvfAAOGsrDjPA,+,server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: sachin tyagi Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:45:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: sachin tyagi [sachintyagi1^^gmail.com] Dear Administrator, I want to unsuscribe from your portal. Thanks Sachin From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Jun 19 20:38:00 2007 From: "Mohamed Z Rishard rishiz{:}hotmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Time dependent DFT calculation of 2-cyclopentenone Message-Id: <-34520-070619165603-20446-bzQCqE8FTruU3rS6kyKiyQ+/-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Mohamed Z Rishard" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:56:00 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Mohamed Z Rishard" [rishiz=-=hotmail.com] I want to do a TD-DFT calculation for the lowest excited singlet state of the above molecule. The route section is as follows: p TD=(nstates=4,root=1) B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) opt freq pop=full However I keep getting a message stating that there is an error. Does anybody have a comment?