From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 01:14:00 2007 From: "Noko Phala nokophala.:.aim.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: yaehmop for windows Message-Id: <-34439-070607091053-1308-3hQ1sqbLGWEkS64JajNzDQ .. server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Noko Phala" Content-Language: i-default Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="EPOC32-S2v9vJm9kVRY_qJkFz_yX8gQM'_f+L'dvdGnVZzZzy5fcCbZ" Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 15:10:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Noko Phala" [nokophala{=}aim.com] --EPOC32-S2v9vJm9kVRY_qJkFz_yX8gQM'_f+L'dvdGnVZzZzy5fcCbZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Has any CCL'er managed to run yaehmop under winXP?I need some installation i= nstructions,cant find them anywhere.I have only used yaehmop on linux and in= stallatuion was straight foward. Thanks in advance, Noko --EPOC32-S2v9vJm9kVRY_qJkFz_yX8gQM'_f+L'dvdGnVZzZzy5fcCbZ Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDMuMiBGaW5hbC8vRU4i Pgo8SFRNTD4gCjxIRUFEPiAKPFRJVExFPkNvbnZlcnRlZCBmcm9tIFJpY2ggVGV4dDwvVElU TEU+CjxNRVRBIEhUVFAtRVFVSVY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgQ09OVEVOVD0idGV4dC9odG1s OyBjaGFyc2V0PVVURi04Ij48TUVUQSBOQU1FPSJnZW5lcmF0b3IiIENPTlRFTlQ9InJ0Mmh0 bWwgY29udmVydGVyIj4KPC9IRUFEPiAKPEJPRFkgQkdDT0xPUj0iI2ZmZmZmZiIgVEVYVD0i IzAwMDAwMCI+CjxESVYgQUxJR049TEVGVD5IaSw8L0RJVj4gCjxESVYgQUxJR049TEVGVD5I YXMgYW55IENDTCdlciBtYW5hZ2VkIHRvIHJ1biB5YWVobW9wIHVuZGVyIHdpblhQP0kgbmVl ZCBzb21lIGluc3RhbGxhdGlvbiBpbnN0cnVjdGlvbnMsY2FudCBmaW5kIHRoZW0gYW55d2hl cmUuSSBoYXZlIG9ubHkgdXNlZCB5YWVobW9wIG9uIGxpbnV4IGFuZCBpbnN0YWxsYXR1aW9u IHdhcyBzdHJhaWdodCBmb3dhcmQuIFRoYW5rcyBpbiBhZHZhbmNlLDwvRElWPiAKPERJViBB TElHTj1MRUZUPk5va288L0RJVj4gCjwvQk9EWT4KPC9IVE1MPiAK --EPOC32-S2v9vJm9kVRY_qJkFz_yX8gQM'_f+L'dvdGnVZzZzy5fcCbZ-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 06:17:00 2007 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_Pe=F1a_Ruiz?= truiz a ujaen.es" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Basis sets and metals Message-Id: <-34440-070608061011-28714-CM+jN/Zc8FaWSvYSsaUUrg-*-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_Pe=F1a_Ruiz?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:11:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_Pe=F1a_Ruiz?= [truiz(~)ujaen.es] Dear all I'm working on two complexes of Cu(II) and Hg(II). They're tetradentate and the link to the ligands occurs through N and O atoms. The systems amounts up to more than 50 atoms each one. I've read the current bibliography and I've checked that B3LYP, B3P86 and MP2 are usual methods. So I think that B3LYP could do it well provided the size of the system (my computational resources are limited, one proccessor xeon-dual core along with 3 MB of memory, per calculation). But what is getting me mad is the basis set. It seems to me that there are a lot of options, usually people use modified standard basis sets on metals and simple ones on the reamining atoms. As for C(II), I've read about Wachters basis set, but it looks huge to handle my systems with it. On the other hand there some papers that solve that problem with small basis sets yielding reasonable results. As regards, the Hg(II) complex I was thinking in something as CEP type basis or LANL2DZ. Could any one give any clarified help? Thanks Regards Tomás From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 07:39:01 2007 From: "Pierre Archirel pierre.archirel:+:lcp.u-psud.fr" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: basis set for metals Message-Id: <-34441-070608072359-25448-FWLMdzf50W7buyiUUMCtIg-$-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Pierre Archirel" Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 07:23:56 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Pierre Archirel" [pierre.archirel|,|lcp.u-psud.fr] Dear collegue, I recommand the SDD core pseudo potentials and basis sets for all atoms. If you have metals and ligands with C, N, O atoms, and if you are using Gaussian, give the following data: b3lyp sddall extrabasis 5d geometry etc C N O 0 d 1 0.8 **** comments: 1- 5d yields spherical d gaussians 2- the SDD basis includes no polarisation orbitals. The d gaussian with exponent 0.8 is taken from the Pople 6-31g* basis. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 08:14:00 2007 From: "Matthias Gottschalk gottschalk~~gfz-potsdam.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: post-Hartree claculations, advice needed Message-Id: <-34442-070608073611-27387-SeJ9tFt3NUkDlIwi70iy1Q---server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Matthias Gottschalk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-9--1026408158 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:35:38 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Sent to CCL by: Matthias Gottschalk [gottschalk-x-gfz-potsdam.de] --Apple-Mail-9--1026408158 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Dear colleagues I hope that somebody could give me some advice. I want to calculate energies for dimers and trimers to extract accurate potentials using post Hartree methods (also for "large" distances > 5 Angstroms). I intend to do this for closed- and open- shell systems (UHF) consisting of simple atoms (in the moment). Because I am not a computational chemistry specialist I did some reading and as a result I concluded that methods like MP4, CCSD and QCISD might be appropriate using a basis set like aug-cc-pVQZ might be appropriate. I did success-full calculations for Ar dimers with gaussian g03 reproducing published results which made me confident. I failed for trimers using these evolved methods so long, however (might be due to that I have only a 32 bit compiled version and the required real memory exceeds 2.2 GB possible with 32 bit, I do have 8 GB, however). MP2 trimers with more simple basis sets work, but that might be not what I want? Now my questions are: 1. are the methods described above adequate? 2. which of the many programs available could be recommended to use? Thanks Matthias -- Prof. Dr. Matthias Gottschalk GeoForschungsZentrum Sektion 4.1 Telegrafenberg 14473 Potsdam Germany tel/fax +49 (0) 331 288-1418/1402 --Apple-Mail-9--1026408158 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Dear = colleagues

I = hope that somebody could give me some advice.
I want to = calculate energies for dimers and trimers to extract accurate potentials = using post Hartree methods (also for "large" distances > 5 = Angstroms). I intend to do this for closed- and open-shell systems (UHF) = consisting of simple atoms (in the moment).
Because I am not a = computational chemistry specialist I did some reading and as a result I = concluded that methods like MP4, CCSD and QCISD might be appropriate = using a basis set like aug-cc-pVQZ might be appropriate.
I did = success-full calculations for Ar dimers with gaussian g03 reproducing = published results which made me confident. I failed for trimers using = these evolved methods so long, however (might be due to that I have only = a 32 bit compiled version and the required real memory exceeds 2.2 GB = possible with 32 bit, I do have 8 GB, however). MP2 trimers with more = simple basis sets work, but that might be not what I want?

Now my questions = are:

1. are = the methods described above adequate?
2. which of the many = programs available could be recommended to use?

Thanks

Matthias

= =

= --Apple-Mail-9--1026408158-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 10:02:00 2007 From: "Maxim Kholin maxim.kholin^^^q-pharm.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Download free trial of a new generation computer aided drug design software (Quantum 3.3.) Message-Id: <-34443-070608083950-30180-SFYChSIiUjPQW0OF3FaRXA:+:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Maxim Kholin" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_3571_01C7A9EB.814993C0" Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:38:55 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Maxim Kholin" [maxim.kholin*q-pharm.com] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_3571_01C7A9EB.814993C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Colleagues,=20 Let me introduce you a free trial of new CADD software, which is all = CCL community is=20 invited to download, compare and discuss at CCL. Quantum contains modules for industrial strength docking / virtual=20 screening of compound libraries on flexible proteins, accurate IC50 = calculations and chemical properties=20 prediction tools (Water and DMSO solubility and LogP) and protein = analysis=20 tools. QUANTUM software employs advanced molecular simulations techniques = rather than statistically trained scores to obtain binding free energies of = the docked compounds. As a result QUANTUM can be used as a robust and = accurate in silico tool for hit identification and lead optimization. This physically-solid approach provides a number of definite advantages = and=20 opens new opportunities in drug discovery. The main of them are as = follows: 1. ACCURACY 2. PREDICTION OF NEW CLASSES OF INHIBITORS 3. POSSIBILITY TO IDENTIFY INHIBITORS FOR TARGETS WITH NO KNOWN LIGANDS. 4. DRAMATICAL REDUCTION IN FALSE POSITIVES 5. FULL PROTEIN FLEXIBILITY IS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION 6. NO TRAINING SETS 7. UNDERSTANDING OF NATURE OF PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS You can evaluate QUANTUM software immediately by downloading free trial = at www.q-pharm.com. A detailed description of technology, and variety of Computer Aided = Drug Design products and services can also be found at www.q-pharm.com = and www.q-lead.com Feel free to post or contact me directly at maxim.kholin-at--q-pharm.com Kindest regards, Maxim =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_3571_01C7A9EB.814993C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Colleagues,
 
Let me=20 introduce you a  free trial of new CADD software, which = is=20  all CCL community is
invited to download, compare and discuss = at=20 CCL.

Quantum  contains modules for  industrial strength = docking=20 / virtual
screening of compound libraries  = on  flexible=20 proteins, accurate IC50 calculations and chemical properties =
prediction=20 tools (Water and DMSO solubility and LogP) and protein analysis=20
tools.

 QUANTUM software employs advanced molecular = simulations=20 techniques rather
 than statistically trained scores to obtain = binding=20 free energies of the
 docked compounds. As a result QUANTUM can = be used=20 as a robust and accurate
 in silico tool for hit identification = and lead=20 optimization.

This physically-solid approach provides a number of = definite advantages and
opens new opportunities in drug discovery. = The main=20 of them are as follows:

1. ACCURACY

2. PREDICTION OF NEW = CLASSES=20 OF INHIBITORS

3. POSSIBILITY TO IDENTIFY INHIBITORS FOR TARGETS = WITH NO=20 KNOWN LIGANDS.

4. DRAMATICAL REDUCTION IN FALSE = POSITIVES

5. FULL=20 PROTEIN FLEXIBILITY IS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION

6. = NO TRAINING=20 SETS

7. UNDERSTANDING OF NATURE OF PROTEIN-LIGAND=20 INTERACTIONS


 You can evaluate QUANTUM software = immediately by=20 downloading free trial at
 
www.q-pharm.com
.

A detailed description = of=20 technology, and  variety of Computer Aided Drug Design products and = services can also be found at www.q-pharm.com and www.q-lead.com
 
 
 
Feel free to post or contact me = directly at=20 maxim.kholin-at--q-pharm.com
 
Kindest regards,
Maxim
 

 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_3571_01C7A9EB.814993C0-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 10:37:01 2007 From: "Mevlut YILDIZ mewlutyildiz=gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: calculation Message-Id: <-34444-070608055421-26816-uJ3bEazzPt7Q5faL5m7DeA]=[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Mevlut YILDIZ" Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 05:54:17 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Mevlut YILDIZ" [mewlutyildiz(!)gmail.com] Dear all, I am using Gaussian 03W program to optimize inorganic molecule containing Fe with 257 atoms applying PM3 method. the job has stopped at 43rd iteration. I decided to change the method as oniom (B3LYP with LANL2DZ basis set for high layer and PM3 for low layer). altought B3LYP/LANL2DZ was applied to the part of the molecule which contain Fe, I have obtain same results:the job has stopped at 43rd iteration. I would like to thanks your kind attention and advices. REGARDS. From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 15:19:00 2007 From: "Alex A. Granovsky gran###classic.chem.msu.su" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: post-Hartree claculations, advice needed Message-Id: <-34445-070608113849-10312-SZDGs3U9aAzJvi84g0qBkQ- -server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Alex A. Granovsky" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0075_01C7AA06.75FA4490" Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:51:52 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Alex A. Granovsky" [gran+*+classic.chem.msu.su] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C7AA06.75FA4490 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Matthias, I would recommend PC GAMESS for very fast and memory efficient MP4 = calculations. Best regards, Alex Granovsky ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Matthias Gottschalk gottschalk~~gfz-potsdam.de=20 To: Granovsky, Alex, A. =20 Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 12:35 PM Subject: CCL:G: post-Hartree claculations, advice needed Dear colleagues I hope that somebody could give me some advice. I want to calculate energies for dimers and trimers to extract = accurate potentials using post Hartree methods (also for "large" = distances > 5 Angstroms). I intend to do this for closed- and open-shell = systems (UHF) consisting of simple atoms (in the moment). Because I am not a computational chemistry specialist I did some = reading and as a result I concluded that methods like MP4, CCSD and = QCISD might be appropriate using a basis set like aug-cc-pVQZ might be = appropriate. I did success-full calculations for Ar dimers with gaussian g03 = reproducing published results which made me confident. I failed for = trimers using these evolved methods so long, however (might be due to = that I have only a 32 bit compiled version and the required real memory = exceeds 2.2 GB possible with 32 bit, I do have 8 GB, however). MP2 = trimers with more simple basis sets work, but that might be not what I = want? Now my questions are: 1. are the methods described above adequate? 2. which of the many programs available could be recommended to use? Thanks Matthias --=20 Prof. Dr. Matthias Gottschalk GeoForschungsZentrum Sektion 4.1 Telegrafenberg 14473 Potsdam Germany tel/fax +49 (0) 331 288-1418/1402 ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C7AA06.75FA4490 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Matthias,
 
I would recommend PC GAMESS for very = fast and=20 memory efficient MP4 calculations.
 
Best regards,
Alex Granovsky
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Matthias Gottschalk=20 gottschalk~~gfz-potsdam.de
To: Granovsky, Alex, A. =
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 = 12:35=20 PM
Subject: CCL:G: post-Hartree=20 claculations, advice needed

Dear colleagues

I hope that somebody could give me some advice.
I want to calculate energies for dimers and trimers to extract = accurate=20 potentials using post Hartree methods (also for "large" distances > = 5=20 Angstroms). I intend to do this for closed- and open-shell systems = (UHF)=20 consisting of simple atoms (in the moment).
Because I am not a computational chemistry specialist I did some = reading=20 and as a result I concluded that methods like MP4, CCSD and QCISD = might be=20 appropriate using a basis set like aug-cc-pVQZ might be = appropriate.
I did success-full calculations for Ar dimers with gaussian g03=20 reproducing published results which made me confident. I failed for = trimers=20 using these evolved methods so long, however (might be due to that I = have only=20 a 32 bit compiled version and the required real memory exceeds 2.2 GB = possible=20 with 32 bit, I do have 8 GB, however). MP2 trimers with more simple = basis sets=20 work, but that might be not what I want?

Now my questions are:

1. are the methods described above adequate?
2. which of the many programs available could be recommended to=20 use?

Thanks

Matthias

-- 

Prof. Dr. Matthias Gottschalk
GeoForschungsZentrum
Sektion 4.1
Telegrafenberg
14473 Potsdam
Germany

tel/fax  +49 (0) 331 288-1418/1402

------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C7AA06.75FA4490-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Jun 8 15:54:00 2007 From: "Shobe, David David.Shobe-*-sud-chemie.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: calculation Message-Id: <-34446-070608152518-4433-pn+ZGqAgxEFDqIVJSDK/rA..server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Shobe, David" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 21:24:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Shobe, David" [David.Shobe,,sud-chemie.com] Mevlut, Is Gaussian ending abruptly with an error, or is it just running out of optimization cycles and printing a table of "Non-Optimized Parameters"? Are the energies from step to step going downward in a reasonable fashion, or are they fluctuating up and down? Any number of things could be happening. --David Shobe -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry_._ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry_._ccl.net] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 5:54 AM To: Shobe, David Subject: CCL:G: calculation Sent to CCL by: "Mevlut YILDIZ" [mewlutyildiz(!)gmail.com] Dear all, I am using Gaussian 03W program to optimize inorganic molecule containing Fe with 257 atoms applying PM3 method. the job has stopped at 43rd iteration. I decided to change the method as oniom (B3LYP with LANL2DZ basis set for high layer and PM3 for low layer). altought B3LYP/LANL2DZ was applied to the part of the molecule which contain Fe, I have obtain same results:the job has stopped at 43rd iteration. I would like to thanks your kind attention and advices. REGARDS.http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txtThis e-mail message may contain confidential and / or privileged information. If you are not an addressee or otherwise authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this e-mail or any information contained in the message. If you have received this material in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.