From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Mar 10 09:43:01 2006 From: "Marius Retegan marius.retegan]*[yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: charge decomposion analysis for W(CO)6 Message-Id: <-31169-060310094043-13566-++6jXE/YOA/nYVClny3sqA[]server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Marius Retegan Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1656675843-1142001594=:18477" Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:39:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Marius Retegan [marius.retegan ~~ yahoo.com] --0-1656675843-1142001594=:18477 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello, I have some problems with performing the charge decomposition analysis with CDA 2.1, which I hope it's still free. I've performed the analysis on W(CO)6, but I get the following error: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ CHARGE DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS S. Dapprich and G. Frenking Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, 1995 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ /Execution started at Fri Mar 10 15:18:41 2006 --- Chemical system information --- Complex C: C6O6W Fragment A: CO Fragment B: C5O5W /Reading basis set information...OK. --- Basis set information --- alpha electrons C: 49 A: 7 B: 42 beta electrons C: 49 A: 7 B: 42 basis functions C:130 A: 18 B:112 /Testing integrity of files...OK. Segmentation fault I think it's something related to the way I've specified the geometries in the input files, but they were done according to the manual. For W(CO)6: #p nosym pop=no iop(3/33=1) iop(3/36=-1) density mp2/lanl2dz no title 0 1 6 0.000000000 0.000000000 2.053337000 8 0.000000000 3.203337000 0.000000000 74 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 6 0.000000000 2.053337000 0.000000000 8 0.000000000 0.000000000 3.203337000 8 3.203337000 0.000000000 0.000000000 8 0.000000000 -3.203337000 0.000000000 6 0.000000000 0.000000000 -2.053337000 6 0.000000000 -2.053337000 0.000000000 6 2.053337000 0.000000000 0.000000000 8 0.000000000 0.000000000 -3.203337000 6 -2.053337000 0.000000000 0.000000000 8 -3.203337000 0.000000000 0.000000000 where the first 2 row from the cartesian coordinates represent the donor fragment, and the rest the acceptor. If someone has some experience with CDA, please give me some suggestions. Thank you Marius RETEGAN --0-1656675843-1142001594=:18477 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello,
I have some problems with performing the charge decomposition analysis with CDA 2.1, which I hope it's still free. I've performed the analysis on W(CO)6, but I get the following error:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      CHARGE DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS   <cda>

             S. Dapprich and G. Frenking
         Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, 1995
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

/Execution started at Fri Mar 10 15:18:41 2006

--- Chemical system information ---

 Complex  C:  C6O6W
 Fragment A:  CO
 Fragment B:  C5O5W

/Reading basis set information...OK.

--- Basis set information ---

 alpha electrons  C: 49  A:  7  B: 42
 beta  electrons  C: 49  A:  7  B: 42
 basis functions  C:130  A: 18  B:112

/Testing integrity of files...OK.
Segmentation fault

I think it's something related to the way I've specified the geometries in the input files, but they were done according to the manual.
For W(CO)6:
#p nosym pop=no iop(3/33=1) iop(3/36=-1) density mp2/lanl2dz

no title

0 1
6        0.000000000      0.000000000      2.053337000
8        0.000000000      3.203337000      0.000000000
74       0.000000000      0.000000000      0.000000000
6        0.000000000      2.053337000      0.000000000
8        0.000000000      0.000000000      3.203337000
8        3.203337000      0.000000000      0.000000000
8        0.000000000     -3.203337000      0.000000000
6        0.000000000      0.000000000     -2.053337000
6        0.000000000     -2.053337000      0.000000000
6        2.053337000      0.000000000      0.000000000
8        0.000000000      0.000000000     -3.203337000
6       -2.053337000      0.000000000      0.000000000
8       -3.203337000      0.000000000      0.000000000
where the first 2 row from the cartesian coordinates represent the donor fragment, and the rest the acceptor.
If someone has some experience with CDA, please give me some suggestions.
Thank you
Marius RETEGAN
--0-1656675843-1142001594=:18477-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Mar 10 16:22:00 2006 From: "Sengen Sun sengensun : yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: A breakthrough in mechanism of concerted cycloadditions? Message-Id: <-31170-060310161844-9212-rcRRmzEPqNgFcY5EVzbQ2Q:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Sengen Sun Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:18:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Sengen Sun [sengensun__yahoo.com] --------- I forward the following message I posted in ORGLIST. ---------- ---------- Thanks to Drs. Darren Rhodes and Yuehui Zhou for suggestions. It took me 20+ years before I figured out how electrons move in concerted cycloadditions. It was my solid computational data that led me to propose a new and general electronic mechanism. I have been struggling for about 7 years to get this thing published. I am not trying to attack any referees or editors > from a few journals. But they did use fierce languages to reject my papers. The 70-years old puzzles already had caused a strongly divided scientific community. And the conceptual confusion derived from the orbital control theories flooded in the chemical literature for nearly a half of century. And the referees had a very limited time to evaluate my manuscript. It is understandable to me that no one in the community can immediately accept my new thinking. If I were one of the referees, it is highly likely that I would reject this kind of papers too! Therefore, as a scientist responsible for science, I had to stand up and took the challenge to spread the new knowledge from my computational studies. I am really grateful to the modern human civilization of the Internet communications. Initially I set up my own web site - Coulombiclab.com and my home office - the Coulombic Lab of Computational Chemistry. But later, I realized I could afford all the costs including computational softwares and hardwares as we have three kids to feed. I started to seek alternative websites..... I have no interest to attack any people. But science has to be made correct unconditionally no matter where and no matter who you are. Science will move forward and no body can stop it. I welcome any comments to my papers. I am ready to explain my theory anywhere and anytime as allowed by by my busy life. I have the confidence that I can convince the public of my explanations of concerted cycloadditions if I am given a chance. Thanks to every one for attention. Sengen > --- Yuehui Zhou wrote: > --------------------------------- > > Why not send to peer reviewed journals first? That's > the usual way to get acknowledged. > > > > >On 2/21/06, Sengen Sun wrote: > > > > > > Recently, I claimed that I have made a > breakthrough in > > > the fundamental understanding of concerted > > > cycloadditions. > > > > > > Now I have uploaded to the CCL site one of my > papers > > > and a ppt presentation I used twice in 2005 for > two > > > international symposiums. The paper was the > first > > > paper I posted in the Chemistry Preprint Server > 5 > > > years ago. Some people already have it. > > > > > > > http://server.ccl.net/cca/documents/ConcertedCycloadditons/ > > > > > > > http://server.ccl.net/cca/documents/ConcertedCycloadditons_2/ > > > > > > My findings on the theoretical knowledge of > concerted > > > cycloadditions are based on such a > "ridiculously" > > > simple method that it may be simply ridiculous > to > some > > > people. I evaluated some arbitrary colliding > complexes > > > and learned some new and very important > knowledge > that > > > is valid in understanding the concerted pathway. > I > > > formulated some new and interesting concepts > such > as > > > conjugation hindrances and easiness of > electronic > > > migration that decide organic chemical > reactivity. > > > > > > I invite every one to criticize my theory on a > > > scientific basis. I invite you to defeat my > > > sensational claims I made in the Conclusions of > my > ppt > > > presentation. If I am convinced anything I made > wrong, > > > I will correct or withdraw it. > > > > > > Thanks to every one. > > > > > > Sengen > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ORGLIST - Organic Chemistry Mailing List > > > Website / Archive / FAQ: http://www.orglist.net > > > To post a message (TO EVERYBODY) send to > everybody_._orglist.net > > > To unsubscribe, send to > everybody-request_._orglist.net the message: > unsubscribe > your_orglist_password your_address > > > > > > > > >-- > >http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ > >Key ID:- 0xB76FE0B9 > >_______________________________________________ > >ORGLIST - Organic Chemistry Mailing List > >Website / Archive / FAQ: http://www.orglist.net > >To post a message (TO EVERYBODY) send to > everybody_._orglist.net > >To unsubscribe, send to > everybody-request_._orglist.net > the message: unsubscribe your_orglist_password > your_address > > --- Darren Rhodes wrote: > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:59:06 +0000 > From: "Darren Rhodes" > To: "everybody_._orglist.net" > Subject: Re: ORGLIST: A breakthrough in mechanism of > concerted cycloadditions? > > Why not post it on wikipedia? > > On 2/21/06, Sengen Sun wrote: > > > > Recently, I claimed that I have made a > breakthrough in > > the fundamental understanding of concerted > > cycloadditions. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Mar 10 18:17:00 2006 From: "Osman Guner oguner|a|turquoisecons.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Call for Papers - ACS Fall : San Francisco Message-Id: <-31171-060310120227-27366-ZY/7HEncFmbVLSTqt46L5Q:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Osman Guner" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01C64421.57488DA0" Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:02:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Osman Guner" [oguner{=}turquoisecons.com] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C64421.57488DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable While we are still gearing up for the Spring ACS meeting at Atlanta that = is about to start in two weeks, I would like to get a head start for the = San Francisco meeting for those people who like planning in advance. This = is one of the symposia that I recycle every two years in order to review = and evaluate most recent developments in the field. =20 ADVANCES IN VIRTUAL HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING =20 at 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA (September 10-14, 2006) =20 Organized by Chemical Information Division (CINF) Co-sponsored by the Division of Medicinal Chemistry (MEDI) Co-sponsored by the Computers in Chemistry Division (COMP) =20 We invite you to present your recent work in the area of virtual high-throughput screening. We will likely have at least two = subsections: 1- new methods and approaches, and 2- recent applications. Depending on = the level of participation, we may open additional subsections. =20 Topics of interest may include: * 2D structure- or similarity-based database searching=20 * Pharmacophore perception techniques and pharmacophore-based screening * High-throughput docking and scoring * ADME/Tox based screening. =20 Please submit your abstracts through the OASYS (http://oasys.acs.org/acs/232nm/cinf/papers/index.cgi ). The deadline = for submitting the abstract is sometime in late April (I will post the = actual deadline date once it is fixed). Feel free to contact me for any = questions or suggestions. =20 Osman F, G=FCner, PhD Principal, Turquoise Consulting oguner.:.turquoisecons.com http://www.turquoisecons.com =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C64421.57488DA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

While we are still gearing up for the Spring ACS = meeting at Atlanta that is about to start in two weeks, I would like to get a head = start for the San Francisco meeting for those people who like planning in = advance.=A0 This is one of the symposia that I recycle every two years in order to review = and evaluate most recent developments in the field.

 

ADVANCES IN VIRTUAL HIGH-THROUGHPUT = SCREENING

 

at 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA (September 10-14, 2006)

 

Organized by Chemical Information Division = (CINF)

Co-sponsored by the Division of Medicinal Chemistry = (MEDI)

Co-sponsored by the Computers in Chemistry Division = (COMP)

 

We invite you to present your recent work in the area = of virtual high-throughput screening.=A0 We will likely have at least two subsections:=A0 1- new methods and approaches, and 2- recent = applications.=A0 Depending on the level of participation, we may open additional = subsections.

 

Topics of interest may = include:

=B7         2D structure- or = similarity-based database searching

=B7         Pharmacophore perception = techniques and pharmacophore-based screening

=B7         High-throughput docking and = scoring

=B7         ADME/Tox based = screening.

 

Please submit your abstracts through the OASYS (http://oasy= s.acs.org/acs/232nm/cinf/papers/index.cgi ).=A0 The deadline for submitting the abstract is sometime in late April = (I will post the actual deadline date once it is fixed).=A0 Feel free to contact = me for any questions or suggestions.

 

Osman F, G=FCner, PhD

Principal, Turquoise = Consulting

oguner.:.turquoisecons.com

http://www.turquoisecons.com

 

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C64421.57488DA0-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Mar 10 22:08:00 2006 From: "Renata Kwiecien renee:p.lodz.pl" To: CCL Subject: CCL: CHARMM - adding hydrogens Message-Id: <-31172-060310181407-16653-dXpaISzTfOpwYaM12spFcg]^[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Renata Kwiecien" Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:14:06 -0500 Sent to CCL by: "Renata Kwiecien" [renee.^-^.p.lodz.pl] Dear Subscribers, I have basic problem with correct adding hydrogen atoms to Leu and Pro when using hbuilt module. Model consists of four parts: Chain A, Chain B, Chain P, INH covalently bounded to the His B 73 and Ser P 230. Inhibitor is a protein-derived chain: Phe-Pro-Arg, has its own unique atom names. I assigned unique atom names to His and Ser and named them Hsi and Sre, respectively, but it did not help. Covalent bond was made by patching His B 73 and Ser P 230. I also patched four Cys-Cys bridges. Parameters for covalently bounded INH are based on CHARMM22 All-Hydrogen Parameter File for Proteins. Part of my input file: ! read in coordinates of subunit B open read form unit 13 name "bppa12.pdb" read sequ pdb unit 13 generate B setup first NTER last CTER rewind unit 13 read coord pdb unit 13 hbuild ic para ic build close unit 13 ! His 73 patch PHS INH 1 B 73 auto angl dihe ! Cys5--Cys149 patch DISU A 5 B 149 auto angl dihe ! Cys58--Cys74 patch DISU B 58 B 74 auto angl dihe CHARMM generates patched active site correctly, but has problems with all Leu B and Leu P and with Pro B 78, Pro B 79, Pro P 196 and Pro P 217. In chain A all hydrogen atoms are placed correctly. What is the source of the problem and how to correct it? Renata Kwiecien