From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 05:31:01 2013 From: "Rudolf Herrmann rudolf.herrmann ~~ physik.uni-augsburg.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL: NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar sructures Message-Id: <-49287-131030041825-12629-JuTdBQlAwEamcQk8duHl8A*|*server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Rudolf Herrmann Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:18:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Rudolf Herrmann [rudolf.herrmann++physik.uni-augsburg.de] Hello, according to my experience, the low energy differences between stereoisomeres are no reliable criterion for deciding about the structure. Anyway, it is by no means sure that your microorganisms prefer to synthesize the thermodynamically most stable compound. I would suggest to calculate the 1H and 13C chemical shifts (GIAO method with DFT - even 6-31G** is not bad for that purpose) for all possible isomers, and compare _all_ shifts with the experimental data. This gives you sufficient statistics to decide which data sets fits better, and therefore probably corresponds to your real structure. Not 100% sure, of course, but a good hint. Hope this helps, R. Herrmann. -- Dr. Rudolf Herrmann Institut für Physik Universität Augsburg Germany From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 08:03:01 2013 From: "Wendy A Warr wendy~~warr.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Proceedings of Dick Cramer's award symposium freely available Message-Id: <-49288-131029235053-20505-46TsBtbBTvsGzHr6xM2k9g . server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Wendy A Warr" Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:50:51 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Wendy A Warr" [wendy{:}warr.com] I have written a 20-page article with 84 references describing the symposium honoring Richard (Dick) Cramer, winner of the ACS CINF Herman Skolnik Award. It is freely available at http://bulletin.acscinf.org/node/536. Dr. Wendy A. Warr Wendy Warr & Associates 6 Berwick Court, Holmes Chapel Cheshire, CW4 7HZ, England Tel./Fax +44 (0)1477 533837 wendy=warr.com http://www.warr.com Skype: wendyannewarr Twitter: =WendyAnneWarr From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 08:38:01 2013 From: "THANGAMANI DEVARAJAN thangam.phy89/./gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Polyrate Troubleshoot-reg Message-Id: <-49289-131030045502-15587-o6Y1whVmStzdq48kZPZMlA],[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "THANGAMANI DEVARAJAN" Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:55:00 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "THANGAMANI DEVARAJAN" [thangam.phy89[A]gmail.com] Dear Sir/Madam, I am D. Thangamani doing Ph.d in the department of DRDO, Bharathiar University Coimbatore and i am working in theoretical studies of atmospheric reactions. We have successfully installed both Polyrate and guassrate. While we have tried to feed an input,we are getting the output as below. cp: cannot stat `/home/rsk/test/i4.72': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `/home/rsk/test/i4.74': No such file or directory rm: cannot remove `esp.fu72': No such file or directory rm: cannot remove `esp.fu74': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `poly.fu6': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `poly.fu15': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `esp.fu83': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `esp.fu84': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `esp.fu61': No such file or directory We can't identify the problem through this output file. System details are given below OS : Linux Version: Gaussrate 2009-A, Polyrate 2010-A Commands: chmod a+x i4.jc dos2unix i4.jc qsub grjob -l nodes=compute-0-1:ppn=8,walltime=500:0:0 So I request you to help me regarding this sir. Thanking you, Yours sincerely, D. Thangamani From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 09:13:00 2013 From: "Radhika geethu radhikageethu14.+/-.gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: error in amber Message-Id: <-49290-131030050820-16783-9ABQuv/af3w5XdvU09IQjw+/-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Radhika geethu" Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 05:08:19 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Radhika geethu" [radhikageethu14..gmail.com] Dear all, I am R.Radhika working as a junior research fellow at Defence research and development organization. I am working with Drug-DNA interaction. For the optimization purpose I have used amber force field in gaussian. After feeding the input I got an error which is given below, Can anybody help me in this issue. # opt freq amber geom=connectivity scf=qc (calculation) From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 09:47:00 2013 From: "Marcel Swart marcel.swart|icrea.cat" To: CCL Subject: CCL: NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar structures. Can a calculation or modelling priortize one of the 2 proposed structures ? Message-Id: <-49291-131030080259-24525-zjW5eGd/7SBBmEIsJtBDqQ*o*server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Marcel Swart Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C436ECAA-651B-433F-B597-DCC53648663A" Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:02:38 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\)) Sent to CCL by: Marcel Swart [marcel.swart~~icrea.cat] --Apple-Mail=_C436ECAA-651B-433F-B597-DCC53648663A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I may have to disagree: S. Osuna, A. Rodr=EDguez-Fortea, J.M. Poblet, M. Sol=E0 and M. Swart "Product Formation in the Prato Reaction on Sc3N#%#D5h-C80: Preference for = [5,6]-Bonds, and not Pyracylenic Bonds" Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 2486-2488 Marcel On 29 Oct 2013, at 22:26, John Keller jwkeller-,-alaska.edu = wrote: > Use appropriate 2D methods such as NOESY. Crystallize and det x-ray = structure. A computed NMR chem shift will not reliably distinguish these = isomers. > John Keller > =20 >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Computational Chemist = computationalchemist ~ ymail.com wrote: > a compound extracted from bacteria gave good antibacterial activity.=20= >=20 > However, the NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar = structures.=20 >=20 > Can a calculation or modelling priortize one of the 2 proposed = structures significantly=20 > to be the most stable and reliable one to argue that it is the = naturally occurring compound?=20 >=20 >=20 > Attached are the proposed structures A and B. >=20 > I suggest to do ab initio calculations at the MP2 level with good = basis set and compare their relative energies.=20 >=20 > However, I am not sure that this will be enough! >=20 > Any other ideas will be very helpful? >=20 >=20 > Thank you, >=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Prof. Dr. Marcel Swart ICREA Research Professor at Institut de Qu=EDmica Computacional i Cat=E0lisi Universitat de Girona Facultat de Ci=E8ncies Campus Montilivi 17071 Girona Catalunya (Spain) tel +34-972-418861 fax +34-972-418356 e-mail marcel.swart#%#icrea.cat marcel.swart#%#udg.edu web http://www.marcelswart.eu vCard addressbook://www.marcelswart.eu/MSwart.vcf =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --Apple-Mail=_C436ECAA-651B-433F-B597-DCC53648663A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 I may = have to disagree:

S. Osuna, A. Rodr=EDguez-Fortea, = J.M. Poblet, M. Sol=E0 and M. Swart
"Product Formation in the Prato = Reaction on Sc3N#%#D5h-C80: Preference for [5,6]-Bonds, and not = Pyracylenic Bonds"
Chem. = Commun. 201248, = 2486-2488

Marcel

On 29 = Oct 2013, at 22:26, John Keller jwkeller-,-alaska.edu <owner-chemistry#%#ccl.net> = wrote:

Use appropriate 2D methods such as = NOESY. Crystallize and det x-ray structure. A computed NMR chem shift = will not reliably distinguish these isomers.
John = Keller
 


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:59 AM, = Computational Chemist computationalchemist ~ ymail.com <owner-chemistry-,-ccl.net> wrote:
 a compound extracted from =
bacteria gave good antibacterial activity. 
However, the NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar = structures.

Can a calculation or modelling priortize one of the = 2 proposed structures significantly
to be the most stable and = reliable one to argue that it is the naturally occurring compound?

Attached are the proposed structures A and B. I suggest to do ab initio calculations at the MP2 level with good basis = set and compare their relative energies.

However, I am not sure = that this will be enough! Any other ideas will be very helpful? Thank you,



=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Prof= . Dr. Marcel Swart

ICREA Research Professor at
Institut de = Qu=EDmica Computacional i Cat=E0lisi
Universitat de = Girona

Facultat de Ci=E8ncies
Campus Montilivi
17071 = Girona
Catalunya = (Spain)

tel
+34-972-418861
fax
+34-972-418356
e-mailmarcel.swart#%#icrea.cat
marcel.swart#%#udg.edu
web
http://www.marcelswart.eu
vCard<= div>addressbook://www.mar= celswart.eu/MSwart.vcf
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D




= --Apple-Mail=_C436ECAA-651B-433F-B597-DCC53648663A-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 13:29:00 2013 From: "Debodyuti Dutta dutta.debodyuti_-_gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: error in amber Message-Id: <-49292-131030112828-18812-Z9vtNUPuEsbdMkVlln6txg]![server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Debodyuti Dutta Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3949cca768b04e9f6fb34 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:58:22 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Debodyuti Dutta [dutta.debodyuti^^^gmail.com] --001a11c3949cca768b04e9f6fb34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 gaussian does not provide any atom types of amber force field. if the force field is UFF then it should be okay. you have to get the amber atom types > from amber website. if your system has to many atoms, then you can use MMTSB to make the atoms in amber format. thanks. Debodyuti Dutta Research Scholar Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Radhika geethu radhikageethu14.^^.gmail.com wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Radhika geethu" [radhikageethu14..gmail.com] > Dear all, > I am R.Radhika working as a junior research fellow at Defence > research and development organization. I am working with Drug-DNA > interaction. For the optimization purpose I have used amber force field in > gaussian. After feeding the input I got an error which is given below, Can > anybody help me in this issue. > > # opt freq amber geom=connectivity scf=qc > > (calculation)> > > --001a11c3949cca768b04e9f6fb34 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
gaussian does not provide any atom types of amber force fi= eld. if the force field is UFF then it should be okay. you have to get the = amber atom types from amber website. if your system has to many atoms, then= you can use MMTSB to make the atoms in amber format. thanks.

Debodyuti Dutta
Research Scholar
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur


On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Radhika= geethu radhikageethu14.^^.gmail.com <owner-chemistry^^ccl.net> wrote:

Sent to CCL by: "Radhika =A0geethu" [radhikageethu14..gmail.com]
Dear all,
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 I am R.Radhika working as a junior research fellow at D= efence research and development organization. I am working with Drug-DNA in= teraction. For the optimization purpose I have used amber force field in ga= ussian. After feeding the input I got an error which is given below, Can an= ybody help me in this issue.

=A0# opt freq amber geom=3Dconnectivity scf=3Dqc

(calculation)



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY^^ccl.n= et or use:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEM= ISTRY-REQUEST^^ccl.net or use
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/co= nferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
=A0 =A0 =A0
h= ttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/



--001a11c3949cca768b04e9f6fb34-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 14:53:00 2013 From: "George Fitzgerald George.Fitzgerald(-)accelrys.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar structures. Can a calculation or modelling priortize one of the 2 proposed structures ? Message-Id: <-49293-131030123404-14153-uEYk47gkxDFfRNRFQiuIJQ_._server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: George Fitzgerald Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_55AC410F3302E740AC9EC50011F73E8F124A8D96AFEXCH1COLOacce_" Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:33:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: George Fitzgerald [George.Fitzgerald{}accelrys.com] --_000_55AC410F3302E740AC9EC50011F73E8F124A8D96AFEXCH1COLOacce_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Did you measure the NMR in solution or crystal phase? The differences between the solution and solid state results is probably at= least as large as the difference between A & B. Hence the calculation shou= ld reflect the experimental condition. If in solution, then the proposed DF= T approach will be ok. If in solid state, then you will first need to deter= mine crystal structure and compute the NMR of the crystal. George Fitzgerald, Ph.D. George.Fitzgerald..accelrys.com +1 858 799 5360 > From: owner-chemistry+gfitzgerald=3D=3Daccelrys.com..ccl.net [mailto:owner-c= hemistry+gfitzgerald=3D=3Daccelrys.com..ccl.net] On Behalf Of Computational = Chemist computationalchemist ~ ymail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:00 AM To: George Fitzgerald Subject: CCL:G: NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar structur= es. Can a calculation or modelling priortize one of the 2 proposed structur= es ? a compound extracted from bacteria gave good antibacterial activity. However, the NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar structures= . Can a calculation or modelling priortize one of the 2 proposed structures s= ignificantly to be the most stable and reliable one to argue that it is the naturally oc= curring compound? Attached are the proposed structures A and B. I suggest to do ab initio calculations at the MP2 level with good basis se= t and compare their relative energies. However, I am not sure that this will be enough! Any other ideas will be very helpful? Thank you, --_000_55AC410F3302E740AC9EC50011F73E8F124A8D96AFEXCH1COLOacce_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Did = you measure the NMR in solution or crystal phase?

The differences between the solution and solid st= ate results is probably at least as large as the difference between A &= B. Hence the calculation should reflect the experimental condition. If in = solution, then the proposed DFT approach will be ok. If in solid state, the= n you will first need to determine crystal structure and compute the NMR of= the crystal.

 <= /o:p>

 

George Fitzgerald, Ph.D.

George.Fitzgerald..accelrys.com

+1 858 799 5360

 

<= p class=3DMsoNormal>From: owner-chemistry+gfitzgerald=3D=3Daccelrys.com..ccl.n= et [mailto:owner-chemistry+gfitzgerald=3D=3Daccelrys.com..ccl.net] On Beh= alf Of Computational Chemist computationalchemist ~ ymail.com
Sen= t: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:00 AM
To: George FitzgeraldSubject: CCL:G: NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar = structures. Can a calculation or modelling priortize one of the 2 proposed = structures ?

&nb= sp;

 a compound extracted from bacteria gave good antibacterial activity. 
However, the  NMR chemical shifts correspond to two v=
ery similar structures. 

Can a calculation or modelling priortize on= e of the 2 proposed structures significantly
to be the most stable and = reliable one to argue that it is the naturally occurring compound?

= Attached are the proposed structures A and B.
 
I sugg=
est to do ab initio calculations at the MP2 level  with good basis set=
 and compare their relative energies. 

However, I am not sure that t= his will be enough!
=
 
Any other ideas will be very hel=
pful?
 
 
Thank you,
= --_000_55AC410F3302E740AC9EC50011F73E8F124A8D96AFEXCH1COLOacce_-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 15:57:00 2013 From: "Jerome Kieffer Jerome.Kieffer|*|terre-adelie.org" To: CCL Subject: CCL: NMR chemical shifts correspond to two very similar sructures Message-Id: <-49294-131030085522-8972-QFVkWDEHn2hdPvFzobcALA : server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Jerome Kieffer Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:55:05 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Jerome Kieffer [Jerome.Kieffer,terre-adelie.org] On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:18:17 +0100 "Rudolf Herrmann rudolf.herrmann ~~ physik.uni-augsburg.de" wrote: > I would suggest to calculate the 1H and 13C chemical shifts (GIAO > method with DFT - even 6-31G** is not bad for that purpose) for all > possible isomers, and compare _all_ shifts with the experimental data. 1H NMR requires a very good description of the solvent environment which is usually not the case. I would advice to focus on 13C NMR. There are basis-sets optimized for nuclear spectroscopies, focusing on the description of the electronic cloud near the nucleus. You should use one of them for the single point GIAO. Cheers, -- Jerome Kieffer From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Wed Oct 30 16:50:00 2013 From: "David A Mannock dmannock{=}ualberta.ca" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Proceedings of Dick Cramer's award symposium freely available Message-Id: <-49295-131030162726-28152-QTSK6M3f/1F8NgNs+FMNPg*_*server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: David A Mannock Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5da0dbd2615304e9fb2881 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:27:17 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: David A Mannock [dmannock+*+ualberta.ca] --047d7b5da0dbd2615304e9fb2881 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Wendy, this is a very useful summary of the area. Will it appear in print as a citable document? Thanks, David On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Wendy A Warr wendy~~warr.com < owner-chemistry-$-ccl.net> wrote: > > Sent to CCL by: "Wendy A Warr" [wendy{:}warr.com] > I have written a 20-page article with 84 references describing the > symposium honoring Richard (Dick) Cramer, winner of the ACS CINF Herman > Skolnik Award. It is freely available at > http://bulletin.acscinf.org/node/536. > > Dr. Wendy A. Warr > Wendy Warr & Associates > 6 Berwick Court, Holmes Chapel > Cheshire, CW4 7HZ, England > Tel./Fax +44 (0)1477 533837 > wendy[A]warr.com > http://www.warr.com > Skype: wendyannewarr > Twitter: [A]WendyAnneWarr> > > --047d7b5da0dbd2615304e9fb2881 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wendy, this is a very useful summary of the area. Will it = appear in print as a citable document? Thanks, David


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:= 50 PM, Wendy A Warr wendy~~warr.com <owner-chemistry-$-ccl.net> wrote:

Sent to CCL by: "Wendy A Warr" [wendy{:}warr.com]
I have written a 20-page article with 84 references describing the symposiu= m honoring Richard (Dick) Cramer, winner of the ACS CINF Herman Skolnik Awa= rd. It is freely available at http://bulletin.acscinf.org/node/536.

Dr. Wendy A. Warr
Wendy Warr & Associates
6 Berwick Court, Holmes Chapel
Cheshire, CW4 7HZ, England
Tel./Fax +44 (0)1477 533837
wendy[A]warr.com
http://www.warr.com Skype: wendyannewarr
Twitter: [A]WendyAnneWarr



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-=
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY-$-ccl.n= et or use:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

E-mail to administrators: CHEM= ISTRY-REQUEST-$-ccl.net or use
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
=A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/co= nferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
=A0 =A0 =A0
h= ttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/



--047d7b5da0dbd2615304e9fb2881--