From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Apr 6 05:46:01 2010 From: "allouche allouche#lasim.univ-lyon1.fr" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Converting Gaussian .log NMR output to .jdx format Message-Id: <-41604-100406034533-3357-PSdynCfptnDCkWeF/srY3A||server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: allouche Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:59:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: allouche [allouche=lasim.univ-lyon1.fr] Dear Robert, Gabedit can simulate a NMR spectrum using the chemical shift and the spin-spin coupling parameters calculated by Gaussian (or any other computation chemistry packages). The simulated NMR spectrum can be compared to the experimental spectrum (read from a jdx or a jMRUI file format). After simulation, you can save the curve in a txt file (2 columns). Gabedit is a free open source. You can download it from : http://gabedit.sourceforge.net Best regards, A.R. Allouche -- Abdul-Rahman ALLOUCHE Fax : + (33) (0) 472431507 Email : allouche|-|lasim.univ-lyon1.fr Web : http://sites.google.com/site/allouchear/ >Sent to CCL by: "Robert V. Kolakowski" [robertk-*-scripps.edu] >Good Day, > >Has anyone out there found an off the shelf solution for >converting Gaussian *.log NMR output to the universal >*.jdx format? > >I'm trying to visualize calculated spin-spin couplings. > >Any help would be welcome. > >Cheers, > >Robert V. Kolakowski, Ph.D. >The Scripps Research Institute >La Jolla, CA, 92037 >robertk],[scripps.edu > > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Apr 6 07:38:01 2010 From: "Kshatresh Dutta Dubey kshatresh*gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Negative NMODE Message-Id: <-41605-100406073510-933-vwfZl1HNQJqJYsgQ95bsMA{=}server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Kshatresh Dutta Dubey Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e899c3fa88b04838fd68e Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:05:04 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Kshatresh Dutta Dubey [kshatresh++gmail.com] --0016361e899c3fa88b04838fd68e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear All, During the calculation of binding free energy i got negative entropic contribution (NMODE= negative). Can entropic contributions be negative, and what is the significance of it? Every help is welcome. Thanks in advance. Regards kshatresh --0016361e899c3fa88b04838fd68e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Dear All,
During the calculation of binding free energy i got negative entropic contribution (NMODE= negative). Can entropic contributions be negative, and what is the significance of it?
Every help is welcome. Thanks in advance.
Regards
kshatresh
--0016361e899c3fa88b04838fd68e-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Apr 6 11:52:01 2010 From: "Tatsiana Kirys nushki---mail.ru" To: CCL Subject: CCL: amino acid clashes Message-Id: <-41606-100406105343-9522-kOzC4J0BcAaMiIYkXvMrLA~~server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Tatsiana Kirys" Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:53:42 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Tatsiana Kirys" [nushki^^mail.ru] Dear All, i'm trying to figure out scheme for calculating protein amino acid clashes. I've read that 1) The overlap between two atoms is defined as the sum of their VDW radii minus the distance between them and minus an allowance for potentially hydrogen-bonded pairs: overlapij = rVDWi + rVDWj dij allowanceij vdw_C = 1.70 vdw_N = 1.55 vdw_O = 1.52 vdw_P = 1.80 vdw_S = 1.80 allowanceij=0.4 (taken from "Penultimate rotamer library") i calculated rotamer clashes from "Penultimate rotamer library" according to 1) for 1st D rotamer: 0 N ASP 1 -1.458 0.000 0.000 1 CA ASP 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 2 C ASP 1 0.551 -1.198 -0.766 3 CB ASP 1 0.536 0.000 1.433 4 CG ASP 1 0.292 1.315 2.147 5 OD1 ASP 1 -0.027 2.312 1.464 6 OD2 ASP 1 0.419 1.350 3.388 i got the following clashes column 3 - first atom column 4 - second atom column 2 - vdw_radius_first_atom+vdw_radius_second_atom column 1 - distance between first and second atom 1 2 3 4 residue=1 has clash=2.461309 3.250000 0 2 residue=1 has clash=2.455509 3.250000 0 3 residue=1 has clash=3.066159 3.250000 0 4 residue=1 has clash=2.534580 3.400000 1 4 residue=1 has clash=2.736671 3.220000 1 5 residue=1 has clash=2.504202 3.400000 2 3 residue=1 has clash=2.379763 3.220000 3 5 residue=1 has clash=2.378700 3.220000 3 6 residue=1 has clash=1.249904 3.220000 4 5 residue=1 has clash=1.247972 3.220000 4 6 residue=1 has clash=2.196847 3.040000 5 6 i'm sure i do something wrong because "Penultimate rotamer library" was checked for the clashes. could someone pleaseeeee help me with figuring out the correct procedure many thanks Tania From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Apr 6 12:56:01 2010 From: "mattia mori.dott!^!gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Force Field parameters for Zinc and Chlorine Message-Id: <-41607-100406105248-8438-3LXKy+swEPI/4NpqR8+LFQ__server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: mattia Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020607040404010502090205" Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:21:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: mattia [mori.dott/a\gmail.com] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020607040404010502090205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Radek, If you want to try with Zinc parameters developed for a similar system you could use these included in Mori M., et al, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, ASAP paper... I developed a forcefield for a zinc-binding motif constituted by an histidine and three cysteines (one N and three S coordinating atoms). Hope this help regards mattia PS: in any case you could check the AMBER mailing list for more info... Amir Taghavi amir_taghavi14a/yahoo.com ha scritto: > > Dear friend, > > you have to search the papers which regarding these specific > structures or any similarity to them. In fact you have to seek that if > any force field parameters have been developed for your aforementioned > atoms or not? You have to pay attention to their functional forms that > with what force field they match. > > Hope this is helpful. > > Regards, > > Amir > > > --- On *Thu, 4/1/10, Radoslaw Kaminski rkaminski.rk**gmail.com > //* wrote: > > > From: Radoslaw Kaminski rkaminski.rk**gmail.com > > Subject: CCL: Force Field parameters for Zinc and Chlorine > To: "Taghavi, Amir " > Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010, 8:17 PM > > Hi All, > > Does anybody have an idea where I can found force field parameters > for Zn and Cl atoms? In my case the Zn atom is 4-coordinated to > two N atoms and two S atoms. The Cl atoms is bound to aromatic > phenyl ring. I was trying to use SYBYL/TRIPOS 5.2 or AMBER (as > implemented in ADF) but such atoms types are not included there. > > Thanks for any help in advance. > > All the best, > > Radek > > --------------020607040404010502090205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Radek,
If you want to try with Zinc parameters developed for a similar system you could use these included in Mori M., et al, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, ASAP paper...
I developed a forcefield for a zinc-binding motif constituted by an histidine and three cysteines (one N and three S coordinating atoms).
Hope this help
regards

mattia

PS: in any case you could check the AMBER mailing list for more info...





Amir Taghavi amir_taghavi14a/yahoo.com ha scritto:

Dear friend,

you have to search the papers which regarding these specific structures or any similarity to them. In fact you have to seek that if any force field parameters have been developed for your aforementioned atoms or not? You have to pay attention to their functional forms that with what force field they match.

Hope this is helpful.

Regards,

Amir


--- On Thu, 4/1/10, Radoslaw Kaminski rkaminski.rk**gmail.com <owner-chemistry*o*ccl.net> wrote:

> From: Radoslaw Kaminski rkaminski.rk**gmail.com <owner-chemistry*o*ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: Force Field parameters for Zinc and Chlorine
To: "Taghavi, Amir " <amir_taghavi14*o*yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010, 8:17 PM

Hi All,

Does anybody have an idea where I can found force field parameters for Zn and Cl atoms? In my case the Zn atom is 4-coordinated to two N atoms and two S atoms. The Cl atoms is bound to aromatic phenyl ring. I was trying to use SYBYL/TRIPOS 5.2 or AMBER (as implemented in ADF) but such atoms types are not included there.

Thanks for any help in advance.

All the best,

Radek


--------------020607040404010502090205-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Apr 6 13:31:01 2010 From: "mattia mori.dott#%#gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Force Field parameters for Zinc and Chlorine Message-Id: <-41608-100406113846-15693-yRp7TfZzFByC4eBm8ZEMIA%a%server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: mattia Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:38:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: mattia [mori.dott:gmail.com] Hi Radek, If you want to try with Zinc parameters developed for a similar system you could use these included in Mori M., et al, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, ASAP paper... I developed a forcefield for a zinc-binding motif constituted by an histidine and three cysteines (one N and three S coordinating atoms). Hope this help regards mattia PS: in any case you could check the AMBER mailing list for more info... Amir Taghavi amir_taghavi14a/yahoo.com ha scritto: > > Dear friend, > > you have to search the papers which regarding these specific > structures or any similarity to them. In fact you have to seek that if > any force field parameters have been developed for your aforementioned > atoms or not? You have to pay attention to their functional forms that > with what force field they match. > > Hope this is helpful. > > Regards, > > Amir > > > --- On *Thu, 4/1/10, Radoslaw Kaminski rkaminski.rk**gmail.com > //* wrote: > > > From: Radoslaw Kaminski rkaminski.rk**gmail.com > > Subject: CCL: Force Field parameters for Zinc and Chlorine > To: "Taghavi, Amir " > Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010, 8:17 PM > > Hi All, > > Does anybody have an idea where I can found force field parameters > for Zn and Cl atoms? In my case the Zn atom is 4-coordinated to > two N atoms and two S atoms. The Cl atoms is bound to aromatic > phenyl ring. I was trying to use SYBYL/TRIPOS 5.2 or AMBER (as > implemented in ADF) but such atoms types are not included there. > > Thanks for any help in advance. > > All the best, > > Radek > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Apr 6 14:21:00 2010 From: "Elaine C Meng meng()cgl.ucsf.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: amino acid clashes Message-Id: <-41609-100406133303-2781-LtriY4+D5vnyEXHa/FnwCg!=!server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Elaine C Meng" Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:32:54 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Elaine C Meng" [meng.]|[.cgl.ucsf.edu] Tania's question was already answered on the chimera-users]|[cgl.ucsf.edu mailing list, see http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimera-users/2010-April/005007.html To summarize, she should be using the option in Chimera's Find Clashes/Contacts tool to ignore pairs of atoms that are directly bonded or separated by only a few bonds. That option is on by default. The bonded atoms are often closer together than would be expected from their VDW radii alone, and if that option is turned off, those pairs will often be identified as clashing even though they are not really clashes. Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. UCSF Computer Graphics Lab (Chimera team) and Babbitt Lab Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Tue Apr 6 15:57:00 2010 From: "Roy Green powergreen _ gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Molpro Message-Id: <-41610-100406154859-29749-snGXj9de6k8Czg9jGobWTw,server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Roy Green Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636310205fdae4e048396ba6b Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:48:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Roy Green [powergreen!=!gmail.com] --001636310205fdae4e048396ba6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Does anyone have experience of Molrpo calculations on GridChem? My jobs sometimes stopped abnormally with job status showing "Time Elapsed", but sometimes, the same jobs can finish normally. I will be very appreciated with your advices. Best regard Roy --001636310205fdae4e048396ba6b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi
Does anyone have experience of Molrpo calculations on GridChem? My jo= bs sometimes stopped abnormally with job status showing "Time Elapsed&= quot;, but sometimes, the same jobs can finish normally. I will be very app= reciated with your advices.

Best regard

Roy
--001636310205fdae4e048396ba6b--