From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Oct 28 08:24:00 2006 From: "Lubos Vrbka lists]|[vrbka.net" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Dlpoly calculation of angular momentum Message-Id: <-32886-061028081915-27276-Go2tmmv4z0ex0XKpXuupvA+/-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Lubos Vrbka Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:18:53 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Lubos Vrbka [lists=-=vrbka.net] hi, > I put a cluster of 55 atoms on top of alkanthiol molecule surface . The cluster is moving as a nano ball and I wanna calculate the angular momentum of this cluster with respect to time. The problem is, there is a periodic boundary and the cluster is moving outside the boundary. The HISTORY file gives me the coordinates inside the box, so I can never know where the actual coordinates of the cluster are. How can I calculate the angular momentum of my cluster? need help... well, i would do the following: 1) check the position of any atom of interest in every step 2) if it moves more than 1/2 of a box distance in any direction, it would indicate that it was wrapped and you need to add/subtract the box dimension to/from the respective coordinate it is neither perfect nor efficient, but it's probably the easiest way how to do that (another way would be to rewrite dlpoly code not to wrap the coordinates). of course this works only if you write the coordinates frequently enough and the box is large enough, so the atoms on average move by much less then half of the box size. regards, -- Lubos _- -_" http://www.lubos.vrbka.net From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Oct 28 08:59:00 2006 From: "Biju AR biju.ar(0)gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: optimization Message-Id: <-32887-061028031247-8926-E5tY7DZ828U7hiJNIq1vMQ:_:server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Biju AR" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_52718_15425909.1162015988539" Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:43:08 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Biju AR" [biju.ar]![gmail.com] ------=_Part_52718_15425909.1162015988539 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello I am new to this field so let me take bail in advance if the question is too simple. I tried to optimize a mono nuclear complex containing coordinated water molecule in *Gaussian 03 by dft method *(opt B3LYP/extrabasis gfoldprint POP=FULL). During optimization one of the hydrogen from the metal coordinated water molecule detached and compound became chemically incorrect. so i did constrain for both hydrogen( bond length and dihedral angle) by using molden program. but optimization terminated with an error Error termination request processed by link 9999. Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/opt//g03/l9999.exe So what should be the problem?. What shall I do to get an optimized structure?. Any information is greatly appreciated. Thanks ------=_Part_52718_15425909.1162015988539 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

Hello
  I am new to this field so let me take bail in advance if the question is too simple. I tried to optimize a mono nuclear complex containing coordinated water molecule in  Gaussian 03 by dft method (opt  B3LYP/extrabasis  gfoldprint POP=FULL). During optimization one of the hydrogen from the metal coordinated water molecule detached and compound became chemically incorrect. so i did constrain for both hydrogen( bond length and dihedral angle) by  using molden program. but optimization terminated with an error
Error termination request processed by link 9999.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/opt//g03/l9999.exe
So what should be the problem?. What shall  I do to get an optimized structure?. Any information is greatly appreciated.

Thanks

------=_Part_52718_15425909.1162015988539-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Oct 28 09:34:00 2006 From: "Tris Youngs t.youngs a qub.ac.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Hyperchem and other "easy" software Message-Id: <-32888-061027194806-5142-SzplGWhxhUG0Jo3XEfmawA]*[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Tris Youngs Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:43:56 +0100 (BST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Tris Youngs [t.youngs^qub.ac.uk] As primarily a condensed-phase modeller, I agree with much of what Dr. Hultin says. Until recently I have conducted my research and subsequent analysis with a combination of three or four different freeware tools (Molekel, gOpenMol, OpenDX etc.) but have increasingly found it rather tiresome to switch between them in order to get things done. I have also not managed to find a tool that provides a regime for the creation of starting configurations that are of use for the simulation of condensed systems. For my two cents, I appreciate that Hyperchem, Spartan and the like offer a 'high-level' solution to computational chemistry, but for many researchers the use of freely-available tools is most attractive. As a previous contributor stated (apologies, I have forgotten exactly who!) the money is probably better spent on hardware on which to run free codes. To depend on too many packages is, I agree, to increase the frustration factor, and a tool that satisfies all users will, I think, never be written. I myself might partially answer the call to Dr. Hultin's request for a (semi-altruistic) programmer, though, as I undertook the challenge to address just this problem (from a condensed matter point of view, but with a general theme) sometime earlier in the year. As a previous user and critic of MSI's Cerius2, I have set my standards quite high! Rest assured, I will inform the list if I manage to create anything I deem worthwhile. And of course, it would be freeware. One point I would like to make though is that I do not believe that the generation of code-specific commands for e.g. Gaussian, GAMESS, is of much importance in any modelling software. There are already tools available that provide interfaces to clusters, queueing systems and the like, and so I would suggest that providing a reasonable geometry/configuration is enough. The onus is then on the user to tell the code in question what to do with the coordinates, rather than rely on the interface to provide exactly what they need. Right, that's probably about a quarter's worth.... Best regards, Tris. -- Dr. T. Youngs (t.youngs(~)qub.ac.uk) Atomistic Simulation Centre Old Physics Building Queens University Belfast Belfast, BT7 1NN, N.I. On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Phil Hultin hultin++cc.umanitoba.ca wrote: > Sent to CCL by: "Phil Hultin" [hultin _ cc.umanitoba.ca] > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_011C_01C6F9D3.A1BB2510 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > I agree with the statement that Hyperchem's primary advantage is easy use, > and its weakness is in the actual implementation of theoretical models. > > > > If you want a user-friendly interface with good computational tools, Spartan > is probably a better choice and is in the same price range as Hyperchem. > Even so, Spartan is by no means an ideal computational code. > > > > The big problems with MOST computational freeware are 1) poor documentation > and 2) cryptic command line interfaces. While there are very nice freeware > visualization tools (eg Rasmol, Molekel, Molden, SwissView) the range of > tools for creating starting structures for computations is much more > limited, and primarily addresses the peptide and nucleic acid communities > (eg VMD/Molefacture). I have also found that several programs that claim to > be able to save structure files in a given format actually create files that > are not readable by other programs - either because the drawing program uses > a "dialect" of the file format, or the computational program does. Yes, you > can use sometimes use OpenBabel to get around this, but the frustration > factor grows with every step you have to go through to get a usable > structure input file. > > > > There is a need for a simple, reliable and FREE option for general structure > drawing that can save in a variety of formats. The Marvin package from > ChemAxon approaches this goal but it is still not quite what I have in mind. > Such a program would create absolutely canonical 3-D structure files in MOL, > XYZ (simple Cartesian and TINKER formats), PDB (both ATOM and HETATM/CONECT > variants), and unique SMILES. The Dundee PRODRG server on the web can do > this but is not as convenient as a local program on one's own workstation or > PC. > > > > It would also be able to make input files for the common computational > codes: Gaussian, GAMESS, MOPAC. I know that GaussView can do this for > Gaussian but GaussView is not free - in fact it is rather expensive. It is > not essential that this Freeware have all the options for these computations > as buttons or menus, but if it can set up the structure of the file > including the coordinate sets, and then give a command line for the user to > type in the route section etc. that would be very convenient. If it had > some tools for creating z-matrices that would be a nice touch but is not as > important as it once was. > > > > Ok, so I have described what I want for Christmas. Any altruistic > programmers out there? > > > > Dr. Philip G. Hultin > > Professor of Chemistry, > > University of Manitoba > > Winnipeg, MB > > R3T 2N2 > > hultin_._cc.umanitoba.ca > > > http://umanitoba.ca/chemistry/people/hultin > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_011C_01C6F9D3.A1BB2510 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = > xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" = > xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" > xmlns:ns0=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"> > > > charset=3Dus-ascii"> > > namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > name=3D"State"/> > namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > name=3D"PlaceName"/> > namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > name=3D"PlaceType"/> > namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > name=3D"City"/> > namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > name=3D"place"/> > > > > > > > >
> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>I agree with the statement that Hyperchem’s = > primary > advantage is easy use, and its weakness is in the actual implementation = > of > theoretical models.

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>If you want a user-friendly interface with good > computational tools, Spartan is probably a better choice and is in the = > same > price range as Hyperchem.  Even so, Spartan is by no means an ideal > computational code.

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>The big problems with MOST computational freeware are = > 1) > poor documentation and 2) cryptic command line interfaces.  While = > there > are very nice freeware visualization tools (eg Rasmol, Molekel, Molden, > SwissView) the range of tools for creating starting structures for = > computations > is much more limited, and primarily addresses the peptide and nucleic = > acid > communities (eg VMD/Molefacture).  I have also found that several = > programs > that claim to be able to save structure files in a given format actually = > create > files that are not readable by other programs – either because the > drawing program uses a “dialect” of the file format, or the > computational program does.  Yes, you can use sometimes use = > OpenBabel to > get around this, but the frustration factor grows with every step you = > have to > go through to get a usable structure input = > file.

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>There is a need for a simple, reliable and FREE = > option for general > structure drawing that can save in a variety of formats.  The = > Marvin > package from ChemAxon approaches this goal but it is still not quite = > what I > have in mind.  Such a program would create absolutely canonical 3-D > structure files in MOL, XYZ (simple Cartesian and TINKER formats), PDB = > (both ATOM > and HETATM/CONECT variants), and unique SMILES.  The Dundee PRODRG = > server > on the web can do this but is not as convenient as a local program on = > one’s > own workstation or PC.

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>It would also be able to make input files for the = > common > computational codes: Gaussian, GAMESS, MOPAC.  I know that = > GaussView can > do this for Gaussian but GaussView is not free – in fact it is = > rather > expensive.  It is not essential that this Freeware have all the = > options > for these computations as buttons or menus, but if it can set up the = > structure > of the file including the coordinate sets, and then give a command line = > for the > user to type in the route section etc. that would be very convenient. = >  If > it had some tools for creating z-matrices that would be a nice touch but = > is not > as important as it once was.

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>Ok, so I have described what I want for = > Christmas.  Any > altruistic programmers out there?

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>Dr. Philip G. Hultin

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>Professor of Chemistry,

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> w:insDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z" w:endInsAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" > w:endInsDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z"> w:insAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" > w:insDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z" w:endInsAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" > w:endInsDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z"> w:st=3D"on"> w:st=3D"on">University of = > w:insAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" w:insDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z" > w:endInsAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" = > w:endInsDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z"> = > w:st=3D"on">Manitoba p>

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> w:insDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z" w:endInsAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" > w:endInsDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z"> Hultin" > w:insDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z" w:endInsAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" > w:endInsDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z">Winnipeg, w:insAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" w:insDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z" > w:endInsAuthor=3D"Philip Hultin" = > w:endInsDate=3D"2006-10-27T13:25:00Z">MB p>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>R3T 2N2

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> lang=3DFR-CA>hultin_._cc.umanitoba.ca size=3D2 face=3DArial> style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'> > > >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> href=3D"http://umanitoba.ca/chemistry/people/hultin"> lang=3DFR-CA>http://umanitoba.ca/chemistry/people/hultin > size=3D2 face=3DArial> style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'> > > >

lang=3DFR-CA > style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'> 

> >
> > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_011C_01C6F9D3.A1BB2510--> > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Oct 28 12:19:00 2006 From: "T-Tsuru coral t-tsuru^^^coral.dti.ne.jp" To: CCL Subject: CCL: MO energy and number of molecules Message-Id: <-32889-061028121637-22005-8OAaa+dQT0difPikYxssVg*server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "T-Tsuru coral" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:11:51 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "T-Tsuru coral" [t-tsuru#%#coral.dti.ne.jp] Hello, CCLers. I have two questions of MO energy concerning the number of molecules. I got interested in the MO energy distribution of assembled molecules, when I developed following SWF(a toy Flash movie!) which shows MO energies (EigenValues) of both H2O monomer and dimmer. [SWF] http://yu-net.info/swfup/viewswf.php/5366.swf ** The calculation is done by MOPAC2000 (c) Fujitsu and the method is PM3 using EF optimization. ** You can see the MO energies by [EV] bottom and see the numerical data by [Data] bottom. And you can drag and move the molecules. When you press [Data] bottom again, the numerical data will disappears. If you want to replay this SWF, please reload the HP. ### Advertisement and Japanese message of uploader should be ignore :-) Highest MO energy and lowest MO energy are nearly equal (5.33/5.03 and -36.82/-37.28). And HOMO-LUMO energy are nearly equal too (4.05/3.64 and -12.31/-11.91). But the number of MO energy is increased nearly double (6 ---> 11) and each MO energy seems to be increased double ([example] monomer No.2: -17.57 ---> dimmer No.3 and No.4). So I have following two questions. Q1) The dimmer's two H2O are same molecule. Why is the number of MO energies increased nearly double? Q2) (Concerning above) Why does monomer's each MO energy seem to be increased double? (Why can't be dimmer's two MO energies united to one? ) Some books which describe solid material's energy show the increase of energy-level number by the number of atoms. But these books don't describe the reason of this increase. If you know any hint of above two questions, please teach me. When I receive the replies, I will summarize them and send to CCL. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------- Telkuni Tsuru t-tsuru .. coral.dti.ne.jp Bunshi Gijyutu From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sat Oct 28 15:06:01 2006 From: "William F. Coleman wcoleman[a]wellesley.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: MO energy and number of molecules Message-Id: <-32890-061028132538-25451-Uj6u1xuuXFit4iDDL/XMOQ]*[server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "William F. Coleman" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:49:11 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "William F. Coleman" [wcoleman[a]wellesley.edu] "CCL Subscribers" on Saturday, October 28, 2006 at 12:25 PM -0500 wrote: >Q1) The dimmer's two H2O are same molecule. Why is the number of MO >energies increased > nearly double? >Q2) (Concerning above) Why does monomer's each MO energy seem to be >increased double? > (Why can't be dimmer's two MO energies united to one? ) The total number of MOs will be equal to the total number of basis orbitals used. You have used a basis set that in atomic orbital terms could be labeled as a 1s function on each hydrogen and a 2s and 3 2p functions on the oxygen, for a total of six functions for the water molecule. In the transition for atomic to molecular functions, the number of functions must be conserved - if you think of these as orbitals, the number of molecular orbitals mu equal the number of atomic orbitals used in the calculation. With two water molecules you will have twice as many MOs. There is no evidence of the distance between the water molecules in your dimer, but you would expect that if the distance was very large, the MOs on one water would not interact with those on the other, and you would have two sets of identical, non-interacting, MOs. As you bring the two molecules closer (and optimize the configuration of the dimer) you would find more interaction between the MOs on the individual waters, and some changes in the energy, but those changes will never be huge. Hope this helps. Cheers, Flick Coleman _______________ William F. Coleman Professor and Chair, Department of Chemistry Wellesley College Wellesley, MA 02481 email: wcoleman]|[wellesley.edu web: www.wellesley.edu/Chemistry/colemanw.html voice: 781-283-3129 fax: 781-283-3642 Editor, JCE WebWare http://www.jce.divched.org/JCEDLib/WebWare/