From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 04:29:01 2006 From: "Sue Lam chsue2004__yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Question on MP2 calculation with Gaussian 03 Message-Id: <-32666-060929034953-14862-CE/tPBtwoDgvFNSwERF6Pw+*+server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Sue Lam Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-979944207-1159512587=:85327" Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:49:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Sue Lam [chsue2004%yahoo.com] --0-979944207-1159512587=:85327 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thank you very much for all your replies. The basis set and the geometry are correct. I put ¡§sym¡¨ keyword in the MP2 optimization. I will try to delete the sym keyword to see whether the result is more reasonable. "John McKelvey jmmckel%attglobal.net" wrote: Sent to CCL by: John McKelvey [jmmckel__attglobal.net] Was a triplet optimization done first at the SCF or DFT level? This might help getting a good starting point.. John McKelvey Soren Eustis soren]~[jhu.edu wrote: >Sent to CCL by: "Soren Eustis" [soren%a%jhu.edu] >I believe this is caused by the values being extraordinarily high. Let the >optimization run and see if the values are visible in subsequent runs (and >decreasing, of course). > >Soren N. Eustis >Graduate Teaching Assistant >Department of Chemistry >Johns Hopkins University >soren#%#jhu.edu > >-----Original Message----- > > >>From: owner-chemistry#%#ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry#%#ccl.net] >> >> >Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:11 AM >To: Eustis, Soren >Subject: CCL:G: Question on MP2 calculation with gaussian 03 > >Sent to CCL by: "Sue L" [chsue2004[#]yahoo.com] >Hi, > >I am trying to run a MP2 triplet optimization with g03. However I found out >that the maximum force and rms force can't be displayed in the output as >follow. The electronic energy for a first point of the optimzation is 280.21 >(Hartree) lower in energy than that for just a single point calculation. The >electronic energy for a single point calculation seems more reasonable. >Could anyone know what is the problem? > > > > Item Value > Maximum Force ******** > RMS Force ********http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txthttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt--------------------------------- Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business. --0-979944207-1159512587=:85327 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Thank you very much for all your replies. 
The basis set and the geometry are correct. I put ¡§sym¡¨ keyword in the MP2 optimization. I will try to delete the sym keyword to see whether the result is more reasonable.


"John McKelvey jmmckel%attglobal.net" <owner-chemistry[]ccl.net> wrote:
Sent to CCL by: John McKelvey [jmmckel__attglobal.net]
Was a triplet optimization done first at the SCF or DFT level? This
might help getting a good starting point..

John McKelvey

Soren Eustis soren]~[jhu.edu wrote:

>Sent to CCL by: "Soren Eustis" [soren%a%jhu.edu]
>I believe this is caused by the values being extraordinarily high. Let the
>optimization run and see if the values are visible in subsequent runs (and
>decreasing, of course).
>
>Soren N. Eustis
>Graduate Teaching Assistant
>Department of Chemistry
>Johns Hopkins University
>soren#%#jhu.edu
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>
>>From: owner-chemistry#%#ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry#%#ccl.net]
>>
>>
>Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:11 AM
>To: Eustis, Soren
>Subject: CCL:G: Question on MP2 calculation with gaussian 03
>
>Sent to CCL by: "Sue L" [chsue2004[#]yahoo.com]
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to run a MP2 triplet optimization with g03. However I found out
>that the maximum force and rms force can't be displayed in the output as
>follow. The electronic energy for a first point of the optimzation is 280.21
>(Hartree) lower in energy than that for just a single point calculation. The
>electronic energy for a single point calculation seems more reasonable.
>Could anyone know what is the problem?
>
>
>
> Item Value
> Maximum Force ********
> RMS Force ********http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt>
>
>
>
>
>
>


http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml
http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt





Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business. --0-979944207-1159512587=:85327-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 07:03:00 2006 From: "Herbert Fruchtl herbert.fruchtl(-)st-andrews.ac.uk" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: CCL rules Message-Id: <-32667-060929065648-27057-jsMWQUARX4KjRfKWsLgCNQ-.-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Herbert Fruchtl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:19:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Herbert Fruchtl [herbert.fruchtl[-]st-andrews.ac.uk] While I don't want to see the table of contents of every journal that has some bearing on computational chemistry (you can sign up to get email alerts of this kind with most publishers), I always find it refreshing to get a reminder that there are philosophical assumptions underlying chemistry that are worth questioning and discussing. Even though we don't actually have time to do that, but spend our days figuring out the meaning of the IOPs of a certain program... I find it more worrying that somebody with a personal axe to grind (there have been some "lively" exchanges on CCL between Messrs. Sun and Scerri) tries to silence somebody else on procedural grounds. Herbert Dominic Ryan dominic.ryan[*]comcast.net wrote: > Sent to CCL by: "Dominic Ryan" [dominic.ryan . comcast.net] > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > This is actually an interesting topic and a rare digression from G03 > difficulties. > > > > If one looks back over the many years of CCL usage I cannot think of any > other occurrences of a journal editor supplying a steady stream of > references to 'his' journal and I have been reading the list approximately > since it started. > > > > I find it all the more notable when considering that the journal in question > only covers computational chemistry in part. > > > > Occasional pointers to volumes such as the reviews series by Don Boyd were > entirely appropriate I think, in part since they were a single event and in > part because they were completely about the broad subject this list is about > and highly valued by the community. > > > > This is not to say that some of the topics raised are not interesting, > indeed they are. Still, to my reading, Sengen Sun raises a pertinent point > that stands apart from his dispute with articles in the journal. Nor would > I either want to see such discussion of the topics squelched, some of it > does belong here while other topics seem quite a stretch. > > > > So, while I had not twigged to the issue myself, now that he raised the > question I think he may have a point about undue highlighting of a journal > by its editor. > > > > Dominic Ryan > > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:22 PM > To: Ryan, M Dominic > Subject: CCL: CCL rules > > > > Sent to CCL by: Sengen Sun [sengensun+/-yahoo.com] > > > Dear Professor Eric Scerri, > > > In science, there are some basic rules such as > > following logic and using concise words as much as we > > can. These basic rules should make sure that science > > is distinguished from religions, arts, politics, etc. > > In the reality, it is very complicated. > > > I am not sure that you are aware of some rules in CCL. > > Although there are no expplicit rules on journal and > > book advertisements, in my philosophy, the following > > rules apply: > > > "Commercial software: software sold to anyone for more > > than a cost of packing, shipping and handling. If you > > wish to submit a commercial announcement to the list, > > please respect the following rules: > > .. > > No reposting -- Reposts of software announcements are > > not permitted unless new features/releases become > > available."...... > > > In my logic, no journals or books are more priviledged > > to be posted here than software programs of > > computational chemistry. > > > I don't mean to attack your journal or your book. Your > > book about the Periodic Table looks good to me by the > > introduction. I am considering to buy one. But rules > > are rules. I always consider what rules to follow or > > what rules to apply to us. > > > I did see a few good articles in FOCH, although I have > > disagreements on some others. I apologize for my bad > > emotion when I strongly disagree. I like a recent > > article by Jay A. Labinger (FOCH, 2006, 8(2), 97). The > > first sentence in the Abstract says: > > > "The Science Wars have pitted defenders of science > > against those accused of attacking it with the weapons > > of constructivism and relativism." > > > I am very surprised that the attackers on science are > > so sttrong - defenders are pitted! Who did it? It is > > lawless, isn't it? > > > > Regards, > > > > Sengen > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.comhttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = > xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = > xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> > > > charset=3Dus-ascii"> > > > > > > > > > >
> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>This is actually an interesting topic and a rare digression from = > G03 > difficulties.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>If one looks back over the many years of CCL usage I cannot = > think of > any other occurrences of a journal editor supplying a steady stream of > references to 'his' journal and I have been reading the list = > approximately since > it started.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:"Courier New"'>I find it all the more notable when = > considering that > the journal in question only covers computational chemistry in = > part.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Occasional pointers to volumes such as the reviews series by Don = > Boyd > were entirely appropriate I think, in part since they were a single = > event and > in part because they were completely about the broad subject this list = > is about > and highly valued by the community.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>This is not to say that some of the topics raised are not = > interesting, > indeed they are.  Still, to my reading, Sengen Sun raises a = > pertinent point > that stands apart from his dispute with articles in the journal.  = > Nor > would I either want to see such discussion of the topics squelched, some = > of it > does belong here while other topics seem quite a = > stretch.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>So, while I had not twigged to the issue myself, now that he = > raised the > question I think he may have a point about undue highlighting of a = > journal by > its editor.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Dominic Ryan

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:22 PM
> To: Ryan, M Dominic
> Subject: CCL: CCL rules

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Sent to CCL by: Sengen Sun = > [sengensun+/-yahoo.com]

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Dear Professor Eric Scerri,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In science, there are some basic rules such = > as

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>following logic and using concise words as much as = > we

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>can. These basic rules should make sure that = > science

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>is distinguished from religions, arts, politics, = > etc.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In the reality, it is very = > complicated.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I am not sure that you are aware of some rules in = > CCL.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Although there are no expplicit rules on journal = > and

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>book advertisements, in my philosophy, the = > following

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>rules apply:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>"Commercial software: software sold to anyone for = > more

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>than a cost of packing, shipping and handling. If = > you

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>wish to submit a commercial announcement to the = > list,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>please respect the following rules:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>...

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>No reposting -- Reposts of software announcements = > are

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>not permitted unless new features/releases = > become

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>available."......

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In my logic, no journals or books are more = > priviledged

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>to be posted here than software programs = > of

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>computational chemistry.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I don't mean to attack your journal or your book. = > Your

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>book about the Periodic Table looks good to me by the = >

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>introduction. I am considering to buy one. But = > rules

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>are rules. I always consider what rules to follow = > or

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>what rules to apply to us.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I did see a few good articles in FOCH, although I = > have

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>disagreements on some others. I apologize for my = > bad

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>emotion when I strongly disagree. I like a = > recent

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>article by Jay A. Labinger (FOCH, 2006, 8(2), 97). = > The

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>first sentence in the Abstract = > says:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>"The Science Wars have pitted defenders of = > science

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>against those accused of attacking it with the = > weapons

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>of constructivism and = > relativism."

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I am very surprised that the attackers on science = > are

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>so sttrong - defenders are pitted! Who did it? It = > is

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>lawless, isn't it?

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Regards,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Sengen

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>__________________________________________________ an>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Do You Yahoo!?

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection = > around

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>http://mail.yahoo.com

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing = > script =3D-

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>To recover the email address of the author of the message, = > please > change

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>the strange characters on the top line to the [A] sign. You can = > also

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>look up the X-Original-From: line in the mail = > header.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY[A]ccl.net or = > use:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>     <= > /p> > >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST[A]ccl.net or = > use

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>     <= > /p> > >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>   = >    http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml= >

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Before posting, check wait time at: = > http://www.ccl.net

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Conferences: = > http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/ an>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig  (login: ccl, = > Password: > search)

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>If your mail bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error, = > check:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>      =

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>RTFI: = > http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/ nt>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-= > +-+-+-+

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >
> > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0--> > > -- Herbert Fruchtl EaStCHEM Fellow School of Chemistry University of St Andrews From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 08:25:01 2006 From: "Dominic Ryan dominic.ryan::comcast.net" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: CCL rules Message-Id: <-32668-060929081853-31526-J2eiYHLNN7cRNuWjraQcSA%a%server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Dominic Ryan" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:19:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Dominic Ryan" [dominic.ryan#,#comcast.net] Indeed, I tried to convey this as well, perhaps not adequately. I think the topics merit airing and discussion. I would not want to see that, or either party silenced. In fact, I would argue that by more carefully avoiding an appearance of advertising the journal, the clarity and force of argument would likely be improved and I would like to hear that. Dominic -----Original Message----- > From: owner-chemistry~!~ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry~!~ccl.net] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 6:05 AM To: Ryan, M Dominic Subject: CCL:G: CCL rules Sent to CCL by: Herbert Fruchtl [herbert.fruchtl[-]st-andrews.ac.uk] While I don't want to see the table of contents of every journal that has some bearing on computational chemistry (you can sign up to get email alerts of this kind with most publishers), I always find it refreshing to get a reminder that there are philosophical assumptions underlying chemistry that are worth questioning and discussing. Even though we don't actually have time to do that, but spend our days figuring out the meaning of the IOPs of a certain program... I find it more worrying that somebody with a personal axe to grind (there have been some "lively" exchanges on CCL between Messrs. Sun and Scerri) tries to silence somebody else on procedural grounds. Herbert Dominic Ryan dominic.ryan[*]comcast.net wrote: > Sent to CCL by: "Dominic Ryan" [dominic.ryan . comcast.net] > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > This is actually an interesting topic and a rare digression from G03 > difficulties. > > > > If one looks back over the many years of CCL usage I cannot think of any > other occurrences of a journal editor supplying a steady stream of > references to 'his' journal and I have been reading the list approximately > since it started. > > > > I find it all the more notable when considering that the journal in question > only covers computational chemistry in part. > > > > Occasional pointers to volumes such as the reviews series by Don Boyd were > entirely appropriate I think, in part since they were a single event and in > part because they were completely about the broad subject this list is about > and highly valued by the community. > > > > This is not to say that some of the topics raised are not interesting, > indeed they are. Still, to my reading, Sengen Sun raises a pertinent point > that stands apart from his dispute with articles in the journal. Nor would > I either want to see such discussion of the topics squelched, some of it > does belong here while other topics seem quite a stretch. > > > > So, while I had not twigged to the issue myself, now that he raised the > question I think he may have a point about undue highlighting of a journal > by its editor. > > > > Dominic Ryan > > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:22 PM > To: Ryan, M Dominic > Subject: CCL: CCL rules > > > > Sent to CCL by: Sengen Sun [sengensun+/-yahoo.com] > > > Dear Professor Eric Scerri, > > > In science, there are some basic rules such as > > following logic and using concise words as much as we > > can. These basic rules should make sure that science > > is distinguished from religions, arts, politics, etc. > > In the reality, it is very complicated. > > > I am not sure that you are aware of some rules in CCL. > > Although there are no expplicit rules on journal and > > book advertisements, in my philosophy, the following > > rules apply: > > > "Commercial software: software sold to anyone for more > > than a cost of packing, shipping and handling. If you > > wish to submit a commercial announcement to the list, > > please respect the following rules: > > .. > > No reposting -- Reposts of software announcements are > > not permitted unless new features/releases become > > available."...... > > > In my logic, no journals or books are more priviledged > > to be posted here than software programs of > > computational chemistry. > > > I don't mean to attack your journal or your book. Your > > book about the Periodic Table looks good to me by the > > introduction. I am considering to buy one. But rules > > are rules. I always consider what rules to follow or > > what rules to apply to us. > > > I did see a few good articles in FOCH, although I have > > disagreements on some others. I apologize for my bad > > emotion when I strongly disagree. I like a recent > > article by Jay A. Labinger (FOCH, 2006, 8(2), 97). The > > first sentence in the Abstract says: > > > "The Science Wars have pitted defenders of science > > against those accused of attacking it with the weapons > > of constructivism and relativism." > > > I am very surprised that the attackers on science are > > so sttrong - defenders are pitted! Who did it? It is > > lawless, isn't it? > > > > Regards, > > > > Sengen > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.comhttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://w ww.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt------=_N extPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = > xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = > xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> > > > charset=3Dus-ascii"> > > > > > > > > > >
> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>This is actually an interesting topic and a rare digression from = > G03 > difficulties.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>If one looks back over the many years of CCL usage I cannot = > think of > any other occurrences of a journal editor supplying a steady stream of > references to 'his' journal and I have been reading the list = > approximately since > it started.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:"Courier New"'>I find it all the more notable when = > considering that > the journal in question only covers computational chemistry in = > part.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Occasional pointers to volumes such as the reviews series by Don = > Boyd > were entirely appropriate I think, in part since they were a single = > event and > in part because they were completely about the broad subject this list = > is about > and highly valued by the community.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>This is not to say that some of the topics raised are not = > interesting, > indeed they are.  Still, to my reading, Sengen Sun raises a = > pertinent point > that stands apart from his dispute with articles in the journal.  = > Nor > would I either want to see such discussion of the topics squelched, some = > of it > does belong here while other topics seem quite a = > stretch.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>So, while I had not twigged to the issue myself, now that he = > raised the > question I think he may have a point about undue highlighting of a = > journal by > its editor.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Dominic Ryan

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:22 PM
> To: Ryan, M Dominic
> Subject: CCL: CCL rules

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Sent to CCL by: Sengen Sun = > [sengensun+/-yahoo.com]

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Dear Professor Eric Scerri,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In science, there are some basic rules such = > as

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>following logic and using concise words as much as = > we

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>can. These basic rules should make sure that = > science

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>is distinguished from religions, arts, politics, = > etc.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In the reality, it is very = > complicated.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I am not sure that you are aware of some rules in = > CCL.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Although there are no expplicit rules on journal = > and

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>book advertisements, in my philosophy, the = > following

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>rules apply:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>"Commercial software: software sold to anyone for = > more

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>than a cost of packing, shipping and handling. If = > you

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>wish to submit a commercial announcement to the = > list,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>please respect the following rules:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>...

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>No reposting -- Reposts of software announcements = > are

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>not permitted unless new features/releases = > become

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>available."......

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In my logic, no journals or books are more = > priviledged

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>to be posted here than software programs = > of

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>computational chemistry.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I don't mean to attack your journal or your book. = > Your

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>book about the Periodic Table looks good to me by the = >

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>introduction. I am considering to buy one. But = > rules

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>are rules. I always consider what rules to follow = > or

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>what rules to apply to us.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I did see a few good articles in FOCH, although I = > have

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>disagreements on some others. I apologize for my = > bad

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>emotion when I strongly disagree. I like a = > recent

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>article by Jay A. Labinger (FOCH, 2006, 8(2), 97). = > The

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>first sentence in the Abstract = > says:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>"The Science Wars have pitted defenders of = > science

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>against those accused of attacking it with the = > weapons

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>of constructivism and = > relativism."

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I am very surprised that the attackers on science = > are

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>so sttrong - defenders are pitted! Who did it? It = > is

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>lawless, isn't it?

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Regards,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Sengen

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>__________________________________________________ an>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Do You Yahoo!?

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection = > around

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>http://mail.yahoo.com

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing = > script =3D-

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>To recover the email address of the author of the message, = > please > change

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>the strange characters on the top line to the [A] sign. You can = > also

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>look up the X-Original-From: line in the mail = > header.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY[A]ccl.net or = > use:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>     <= > /p> > >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST[A]ccl.net or = > use

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>     <= > /p> > >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>   = >    http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml= >

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Before posting, check wait time at: = > http://www.ccl.net

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Conferences: = > http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/ an>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig  (login: ccl, = > Password: > search)

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>If your mail bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error, = > check:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>      =

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>RTFI: = > http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/ nt>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-= > +-+-+-+

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >
> > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0--> > > -- Herbert Fruchtl EaStCHEM Fellow School of Chemistry University of St Andrewshttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_messagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 09:00:00 2006 From: "polosan silviu spol68*o*yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: spin-orbit Message-Id: <-32669-060929061536-17938-Xw92UGia7mZ4AtJGa7vVuA * server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: polosan silviu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1166283630-1159521321=:60568" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:15:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: polosan silviu [spol68-.-yahoo.com] --0-1166283630-1159521321=:60568 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello everybody, If someone can tell me how can I introduce spin-orbit coupling as a distinct option into Gaussian03W. Thank you Silviu Dr. Silviu POLOSAN Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan e-mails: polosan*cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp; silv*infim.ro --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. --0-1166283630-1159521321=:60568 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello everybody,
 
If someone can tell me how can I introduce spin-orbit coupling as a distinct option into Gaussian03W.
 
Thank you
 
Silviu


Dr. Silviu POLOSAN
Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan
e-mails: polosan*cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp;
silv*infim.ro


Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. --0-1166283630-1159521321=:60568-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 10:41:00 2006 From: "Jim Kress ccl_nospam_-_kressworks.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: CCL rules Message-Id: <-32670-060929101741-14560-U8S5dE6NcecHXrJ3Sk0TsA#,#server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Jim Kress" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:17:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Jim Kress" [ccl_nospam..kressworks.com] OK. I'll bite. What is "FOCH" and how do I access it? Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominic Ryan dominic.ryan[*]comcast.net > [mailto:owner-chemistry . ccl.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:14 PM > To: Kress, Jim > Subject: CCL:G: CCL rules > > Sent to CCL by: "Dominic Ryan" [dominic.ryan . comcast.net] > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > This is actually an interesting topic and a rare digression > from G03 difficulties. > > > > If one looks back over the many years of CCL usage I cannot > think of any other occurrences of a journal editor supplying > a steady stream of references to 'his' journal and I have > been reading the list approximately since it started. > > > > I find it all the more notable when considering that the > journal in question only covers computational chemistry in part. > > > > Occasional pointers to volumes such as the reviews series by > Don Boyd were entirely appropriate I think, in part since > they were a single event and in part because they were > completely about the broad subject this list is about and > highly valued by the community. > > > > This is not to say that some of the topics raised are not > interesting, indeed they are. Still, to my reading, Sengen > Sun raises a pertinent point that stands apart from his > dispute with articles in the journal. Nor would I either > want to see such discussion of the topics squelched, some of > it does belong here while other topics seem quite a stretch. > > > > So, while I had not twigged to the issue myself, now that he > raised the question I think he may have a point about undue > highlighting of a journal by its editor. > > > > Dominic Ryan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:22 PM > To: Ryan, M Dominic > Subject: CCL: CCL rules > > > > Sent to CCL by: Sengen Sun [sengensun+/-yahoo.com] > > > > > Dear Professor Eric Scerri, > > > > > In science, there are some basic rules such as > > following logic and using concise words as much as we > > can. These basic rules should make sure that science > > is distinguished from religions, arts, politics, etc. > > In the reality, it is very complicated. > > > > > I am not sure that you are aware of some rules in CCL. > > Although there are no expplicit rules on journal and > > book advertisements, in my philosophy, the following > > rules apply: > > > > > "Commercial software: software sold to anyone for more > > than a cost of packing, shipping and handling. If you > > wish to submit a commercial announcement to the list, > > please respect the following rules: > > .. > > No reposting -- Reposts of software announcements are > > not permitted unless new features/releases become > > available."...... > > > > > In my logic, no journals or books are more priviledged > > to be posted here than software programs of > > computational chemistry. > > > > > I don't mean to attack your journal or your book. Your > > book about the Periodic Table looks good to me by the > > introduction. I am considering to buy one. But rules > > are rules. I always consider what rules to follow or > > what rules to apply to us. > > > > > I did see a few good articles in FOCH, although I have > > disagreements on some others. I apologize for my bad > > emotion when I strongly disagree. I like a recent > > article by Jay A. Labinger (FOCH, 2006, 8(2), 97). The > > first sentence in the Abstract says: > > > > > "The Science Wars have pitted defenders of science > > against those accused of attacking it with the weapons > > of constructivism and relativism." > > > > > I am very surprised that the attackers on science are > > so sttrong - defenders are pitted! Who did it? It is > > lawless, isn't it? > > > > Regards, > > > > Sengen > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.comhttp://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_m essagehttp://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtmlhttp://www.ccl.net/spammer s.txt------=_NextPart_000_003C_> 01C6E34D.B8E721E0 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = > xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = > xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> > > > charset=3Dus-ascii"> > > > medium)"> > > > > > >
> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>This is actually an interesting topic and a rare > digression from = > G03 > difficulties.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>If one looks back over the many years of CCL usage I > cannot = think of any other occurrences of a journal editor > supplying a steady stream of references to 'his' journal and > I have been reading the list = approximately since it > started.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

New"> New"'>I find it all the more notable when = considering that > the journal in question only covers computational chemistry > in = part.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Occasional pointers to volumes such as the reviews > series by Don = Boyd were entirely appropriate I think, in > part since they were a single = event and in part because > they were completely about the broad subject this list = is > about and highly valued by the community. >

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>This is not to say that some of the topics raised are > not = interesting, indeed they are.  Still, to my > reading, Sengen Sun raises a = pertinent point that stands > apart from his dispute with articles in the journal.  = > Nor would I either want to see such discussion of the topics > squelched, some = of it does belong here while other topics > seem quite a = stretch.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>So, while I had not twigged to the issue myself, now > that he = raised the question I think he may have a point > about undue highlighting of a = journal by its > editor.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Dominic Ryan

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry[A]ccl.net] > >
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:22 PM
> To: Ryan, M Dominic
> Subject: CCL: CCL rules

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Sent to CCL by: Sengen Sun = > [sengensun+/-yahoo.com]

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Dear Professor Eric Scerri,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In science, there are some basic rules such = > as

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>following logic and using concise words as much as = > we

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>can. These basic rules should make sure that = > science

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>is distinguished from religions, arts, politics, = > etc.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In the reality, it is very = > complicated.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I am not sure that you are aware of some rules in = > CCL.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Although there are no expplicit rules on journal = > and

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>book advertisements, in my philosophy, the = > following

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>rules apply:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>"Commercial software: software sold to anyone > for = more

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>than a cost of packing, shipping and handling. If = > you

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>wish to submit a commercial announcement to the = > list,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>please respect the following > rules:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>...

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>No reposting -- Reposts of software announcements = > are

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>not permitted unless new features/releases = > become

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>available."......

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>In my logic, no journals or books are more = > priviledged

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>to be posted here than software programs = > of

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>computational chemistry.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I don't mean to attack your journal or your book. = > Your

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>book about the Periodic Table looks good to me by the > =

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>introduction. I am considering to buy one. But = > rules

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>are rules. I always consider what rules to follow = > or

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>what rules to apply to us.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I did see a few good articles in FOCH, although I = > have

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>disagreements on some others. I apologize for my = > bad

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>emotion when I strongly disagree. I like a = > recent

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>article by Jay A. Labinger (FOCH, 2006, 8(2), 97). = > The

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>first sentence in the Abstract = > says:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>"The Science Wars have pitted defenders of = > science

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>against those accused of attacking it with the = > weapons

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>of constructivism and = > relativism."

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>I am very surprised that the attackers on science = > are

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>so sttrong - defenders are pitted! Who did it? It = > is

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>lawless, isn't it?

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Regards,

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Sengen

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>__________________________________________________ > an>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Do You Yahoo!?

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection = around

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>http://mail.yahoo.com

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-=3D This is automatically added to each message by > the mailing = script =3D-

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>To recover the email address of the author of the > message, = please change

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>the strange characters on the top line to the [A] > sign. You can = also

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>look up the X-Original-From: line in the mail = > header.

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY[A]ccl.net or = > use:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>     <= > /p> > >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>E-mail to administrators: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST[A]ccl.net > or = use

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>     <= > /p> > >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>   = >    http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml > = >

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Before posting, check wait time at: = > http://www.ccl.net

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Conferences: = > http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/ > an>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig  (login: ccl, = > Password: > search)

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>If your mail bounces from CCL with 5.7.1 error, = > check:

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>      =

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>RTFI: = > http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/ > nt>

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > -+-+-+-+-+-= > +-+-+-+

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >

style=3D'font-size: > 10.0pt'> 

> >
> > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C6E34D.B8E721E0-- > > > > -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing > script =- To recover the email address of the author of the > message, please change the strange characters on the top line > to the . sign. You can also look up the X-Original-From: line > in the mail header.> Conferences: > http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/ > > Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/htdig (login: ccl, > Password: search)> > -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > -+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 11:16:00 2006 From: "Georg Lefkidis lefkidis _ physik.uni-kl.de" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: AW: G: spin-orbit Message-Id: <-32671-060929104942-1429-8JEhQrscR1FaR/YPzFvZDQ{=}server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Georg Lefkidis" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Georg Lefkidis" [lefkidis-x-physik.uni-kl.de] Dear Silviu, spin-orbit coupling is very poorly implemented in Gaussian03 (if at all!!). You need to do one averaged CAS calculation, and then choose out of result the two roots that are of interest, which you will then state-interact to get SOC. However, you cannot have determinants with different spin projections interact (since they cannot come from the same CAS calculation) so in theory only the z-component is computed. In other words there is no spin-mixing capability (at least until revision B), and the energy splittings are incomplete which makes the whole calculation completely useless.... If you still want to try it, then do a CAS calculation with the spin option i.e., CAS(a,b,spin) and then at the end of your file leave a blank line, and enter two numbers which indicate the roots that you want to interact. Also note that although you will be making a stateaverage calculation (same as CAS(a,b,stateaverage)) you can NOT enter weights for other roots than the ones you let interact. So if you have any energy crossings during the convergence procedure (or degenerate states which need to be accounted for together), you can forget it as well... I hope that in the future releases of Gaussian (which I consider a very strong programm in calculating difficult molecules) spin-orbit interaction will be truly implemented. Cheers Georg --------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Georg Lefkidis E-mail:lefkidis+/-physik.uni-kl.de University of Kaiserslautern Tel. +49 631 205 3207 Department of Physics Fax: +49 631 205 3907 PO Box 3049 67653 Kaiserslautern Germany --------------------------------------------------------------- > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-chemistry+/-ccl.net [mailto:owner-chemistry+/-ccl.net] > Gesendet: Freitag, 29. September 2006 15:16 > An: Lefkidis, Georg > Betreff: CCL:G: spin-orbit > > > Sent to CCL by: polosan silviu [spol68-.-yahoo.com] > --0-1166283630-1159521321=:60568 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Hello everybody, > > If someone can tell me how can I introduce spin-orbit coupling > as a distinct option into Gaussian03W. > > Thank you > > Silviu > > > Dr. Silviu POLOSAN > Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan > e-mails: polosan++cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp; > silv++infim.ro > > --------------------------------- > Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. > Great rates starting at 1¢/min. > --0-1166283630-1159521321=:60568 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > >
Hello everybody,
 
If someone > can tell me how can I introduce spin-orbit coupling as a distinct > option into Gaussian03W.
 
Thank > you
 
Silviu


Dr. Silviu > POLOSAN
Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto > 603-8555, Japan
e-mails: polosan++cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp;
> silv++infim.ro

>


Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to > make PC-to-Phone calls.
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman7/*http://us. > rd.yahoo.com/evt=39666/*http://messenger.yahoo.com"> Great rates > starting at 1¢/min. > --0-1166283630-1159521321=:60568--> > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/458 - Release Date: 27/09/06 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/458 - Release Date: 27/09/06 From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 11:50:00 2006 From: "Adlane sayede adlane.sayede*o*gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: scrf calculation with Gaussian 03 Message-Id: <-32672-060929110904-10551-r/QrF3YEqxwUle6vJ3GFsg++server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Adlane sayede" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10471_28388407.1159542524763" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:08:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: "Adlane sayede" [adlane.sayede]_[gmail.com] ------=_Part_10471_28388407.1159542524763 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello everybody, I am doing PCM calculation with Gaussian 03 and I get the following message : AdVTs1: ISph=15347 is engulfed by JSph=15350 but Ae(15347) is not yet zero! Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/oem/g03_D02/g03/l301.exe at Fri Sep 29 14:48:24 2006. somebody have already meet this kind of problems???? Thank you in advance!!!! Here is keyword that I used : # opt b3lyp/6-31 scrf=(solvent=water) geom=connectivity ------=_Part_10471_28388407.1159542524763 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello everybody,  
I am doing PCM calculation with Gaussian 03 and I get the following message :  
 
AdVTs1: ISph=15347 is engulfed by JSph=15350 but Ae(15347) is not yet zero!  
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/oem/g03_D02/g03/l301.exe at Fri Sep 29 14:48:24 2006.   
 
somebody have already  meet this kind of problems????  
 
Thank you in advance!!!!   
   
Here is keyword that I used  :  
 
# opt b3lyp/6-31 scrf=(solvent=water) geom=connectivity  

------=_Part_10471_28388407.1159542524763-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 12:41:00 2006 From: "Mary Veronica O Connor moconnor++westliberty.edu" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Training set for force field parameters for Fe Message-Id: <-32673-060929105900-7996-B86S2//H1WHzFDNfxZFKRQ|,|server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Mary Veronica O Connor" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:58:59 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Mary Veronica O Connor" [moconnor(_)westliberty.edu] Hello, CCLers: Can anyone suggest a training sey of simple organo-iron molecules that would be suitable for DFT calculations to generate forcefield parameters? Heme itself is just too big. Thanks, Mary From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 13:24:00 2006 From: "Andrew Slupe andrew.slupe:+:boisetechnology.org" To: CCL Subject: CCL:G: Gaussian 03 Interface Message-Id: <-32674-060929131347-5989-rIiCCnFuDsqIIdIWZd4AHQ^_^server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Andrew Slupe" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:13:47 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Andrew Slupe" [andrew.slupe##boisetechnology.org] I am currently trying to determine which program will serve as an interface for submitting jobs to Gaussian 03. Under consideration are Chem3D, HyperChem, GaussView, and Spartan. It is hoped that the interface program will be able to perform a 'good' conformational distribution analysis and provide initial semi-empirical gas-phase energy minimization calculations. It is also hoped that the interface program will be able to submit a structure to Gaussian for further optimization and solvation energy calculations. The end goal of the study is to investigate the theoretical partitioning behavior of a number of compounds in a multisolvent, mixed phase system using the solvation energy results from Gaussian 03. Any and all thoughts, suggestions, or opinions from the CCL community at large would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all very much for your time, Andrew Slupe Andrew.Slupe[*]boisetechnology.org From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Fri Sep 29 15:58:00 2006 From: "Guosheng Wu wu_guosheng2002]![yahoo.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: Database for water-alkane partition coefficients? Message-Id: <-32675-060929155351-9556-xjUqeC0xr8vFPkBEAFwdpg-#-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Guosheng Wu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:53:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Guosheng Wu [wu_guosheng2002 : yahoo.com] Dear listers, I wonder if you know there is any database for experimental water-alkane partition coefficients. The quality and size(1000+ prefered) of the data is critical, and the alkane can be of any saturated hydrocarbons (such as hexadecane) as long as it's all the same alkane. > From some quick literature search, I only found several papers containing such data, but they are usually no more than a few hundred of molecules, and do not have electronical format of molecule files. Any information on literature or commerical package will be appreciated. Thanks a lot, Guosheng Wu __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com